It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Straw man of the deceptive type.
Originally posted by -PLB-
reply to post by Darkwing01
Sure man, all that debris bounced all the way to the side like bouncy balls. Whatever works for you in lalaland.
You are making it appear like explaining something to you makes any difference. Do you also believe nearly all the mass bounced away like little bouncing balls?
Where do I claim a "box" is coming down? (I am guessing these are all straw man arguments of the delusional type).
Now take a square of 5x5m filled with cups and drop an equivalent number of cups on it from 1m height. Where will the majority of the mass end up, inside of outside the 5x5 square?
One note, I am just using your silly experiment to show how it backfires on you, not to describe what actually happened in the WTC.
I know that truthers have a very hard time reading, especially when there is more than one line of text. So I will repeat this one line, focus:
Originally posted by Darkwing01
So what you are saying is that a falling box is NOT what happened, but a falling box is what needed to happen to get your pancake to happen...
So in what sense did you mean that "experiment" then?
Square vs. Box? Really PLB?
You have now made it perfectly clear that you experiment is not relevant, so the implication is mine was.
It is not even about mass ending up in the footprint (if you recall I mentioned this before). It is about mass being at the collapse INTERFACE.
It is not just where it it, but when and how it gets there
The mass can not both be within the perimeter of the building and not resting on something.
There are no other options.