Originally posted by adeclerk
reply to post by Wertwog
All it would take is some contrary data. There are many organizations around the US that sample air, water and soil on a daily basis. Why have they
not come out with the contrary data? Is it not extant?
So far all you've provided are some citizens who asked some questions, and if I recall correctly they were all answered properly in the threads at
Berkeley's site (don't remember how the "conflict of interest" one resolved, though).
So, where is all of this contrary data?
Radioactive cesium in San Francisco Bay Area milk..still.. close to exceeding EPA's Max.
EPA: Radioactive Iodine-131 levels in PA & MA rainwater “exceed maximum contaminant level permitted in drinking water”
Nuclear policy expert: “Striking” that radioactive iodine-131 in California rainwater is so far above level permitted in drinking water
Fukushima Radioative caesium leaks 'equal 168 Hiroshimas'
Radioactive fish found in Connecticut River — State officials trying to determine source of Strontium-90
Iodine-131 also found in Philadelphia-area sewage plants; Sludge set off radiation detectors at landfills
...Cancer patients from TMI... ya.right.uhuh.
Radiation data from Seattle-area survey may be withheld by Feds for national security purposes?
B.C. Canada sees major spike in Baby Deaths ( Fukushima to blame?)
Canada sees spike in number of sudden infant deaths — "Why so many of those have come up this year, we don't know"
FOXNEWS admits food supply is radioactive in the USA.
"Milk, fruits and vegetables show trace amounts of radioactive isotopes from the Fukushima Daichi power plants, and the media appears to be paying
scant attention, if any attention at all. It is as if the problem only involves Japan "
Amount of radiation in 3 gallons of milk from Hilo, Hawaii surpasses annual maximum contaminant level set by EPA
Baby Deaths up 48% in Philly since Radioactive Iodine spike in Drinking Water there says Dr Mangano.
Report by Dr Sherman/Mangano shows Big Spike in Baby Deaths from CDC Data.
EPA to raise safe limits (Berkeley... your fave)
Oh Dang, from your Berkeley folks; EPA’s radiation detection system not 100 percent
Watchdog: Inexplicable that EPA shut down Fukushima radiation monitoring after finding high levels of radiation in drinking water
EPA: Boise rainwater has highest levels of radioactive material in US… 80 times amount of I-131 allowed in drinking water — “Officials had no
California nuclear expert criticizes EPA: “We have an emergency network that’s supposed to help us know whether to take emergency action and
it’s not working”
EPA radiation monitoring exists so Feds can say they have a system — Not to report data that would undermine public support for nuclear power,
Ok, I don't know why I bothered to do this but what burns me is you get to sit in your comfy chair passing judgement on all this work I've done for
you when you could have done it yourself, but that's not your agenda right? You think that you have the status quo and are on the right side of the
data, when there is so much contrary data the burden of proof is actually falling to you to prove everything is as 'fine' as you seem to believe.
Normalcy bias is powerful, and hey, wouldn't it be great if everything was as peachy as you seem to believe. So go ahead, believe whatever you want.
I'm out of this conversation and done wasting my time on you, see ya.
edit on 6-12-2011 by Wertwog because: (no reason given)