It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
cop out, you have no direct point. I win.
Originally posted by NIcon
reply to post by SkepticAndBeliever
"Countless eye witnesses accounts proving they ALL knew it was going to collapse shows that a demo was NOT NEEDED because demos happen in seconds and without warning"
Eyewitness 1: "That building's going to collapse"
Eyewitness 2: "Is that a warning?"
Eyewitness 1: "Nope"
Eyewitness 2: "Then what is it then?"
Eyewitness 1: "I don't know"
hmmmmm?
Originally posted by SkepticAndBeliever
Originally posted by NightGypsy
reply to post by SkepticAndBeliever
Selected columns on floors where explosives will be set are drilled and nitroglycerin, TNT or C4 are placed in the holes. only a few floors are rigged with explosives, so that it is safer (fewer explosives) and less costly.
so from that entire post only this is what actually counts - the rest is for buildings that are supposed to be coming down and are totally irrelevant
fail
Originally posted by SkepticAndBeliever
There were explosions in the basement before the plane hit.
Please try to make sense here. There should have been SO many detonation cords or else how can there be a "controlled" demolition? How would be be controlled? ask yourself these questions.
Originally posted by SkepticAndBeliever
Originally posted by joeym1991
Not a good thread. I wonder who wrote all that? can you provide who it was? He probably dosen't know all the facts.
And that's based on what? Explain how a controlled demolition is possible when the only way to control is demo is by using detonator cords (how else would you?). There would have been SOOO much evidence of detonation cords if there was anything remotely CLOSE to a CD that happened, and they would have stretched out for BLOCKS. controlled demo not possible.
Originally posted by SkepticAndBeliever
There were explosions in the basement before the plane hit.
And what would be the point of detonating explosives and causing explosions and HOUR before the towers collapsed, when a demolition only takes a few seconds? Please try to make sense here. There should have been SO many detonation cords or else how can there be a "controlled" demolition? How would be be controlled? ask yourself these questions.
Originally posted by esdad71
Every piece of that building was searched by the FBI.
Originally posted by esdad71
1. There is NO evidence of a CD visually or acoustically.
Originally posted by esdad71
2. There is NO evidence of thermite being used
Originally posted by esdad71
, and just so you know, thermite needs something to initiate the reaction so there would be evidence left.
Originally posted by esdad71
4. If this was a professional demolition, they would not have been paid as the building did not fall into their own footprints which is what is done. There was damage to multiple buildings including WTC7.
Originally posted by wildernesswino
reply to post by derst1988
Just for the record from someone that actually has experience (extensive) with steel structures, shape charges, and det cord...
detonaton cord is PTEN and is itself a highly volitile explosive, with a burn rate of about 4 miles per second!
It literaly explodes; you would not have found much of it left after the demo.
It is NOT an "electrical cord".
Originally posted by SkepticAndBeliever
reply to post by SkepticAndBeliever
How do you explain all the detonator cords that SHOULD have been discovered but WEREN'T? How do you explain the building standing up after the application of the explosives when the supports had to be weakened for it to work? You only pick out one little detail you don't like while ignoring the other abundance of proof, try explaining ALL the claims.