It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
That's not correct, according to the national institutes of health website here: www.nlm.nih.gov...
Originally posted by HappyBunny
Also, there's a difference between organic and inorganic mercury. Inorganic mercury isn't bioaccumulative, which means it doesn't build up in the blood, bones, or tissues. That is what's in thimerasol.
PS--I don't mean to come off so harshly, but this is one subject that really gets my hackles up.
Originally posted by Griffo
reply to post by jameshawkings
The study that 'proved' the link between vaccines and autism was discredited by every major health organisation in the world and retracted soon after. It was found to be fraudulent, as Andrew Wakefield was receiving payments off other people to skew his results. That combined with the fact that the study was performed on only 12 people, 4 of which had pre existing mental health conditions
Originally posted by vkturbo
reply to post by Griffo
Last paragraph of link will find better link when I'm home have it on favourites list but this blames the mercury I've always know Aluminium does this being in the trade working with metals this link between aluminium and alzheimers has been around for a fair while.
www.naturalnews.com...
www.ageofautism.com...edit on 20-6-2011 by vkturbo because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Griffo
reply to post by jameshawkings
No, it isn't there for all to see. If you had read into this debacle in any detail, as I have clearly explained in my previous post, you would know that he was bribed to skew the results
We do studies and we have them peer reviewed because they are unbiased by their very nature. This study was quickly peer reviewed because it makes such a strong claim, it was subsequently rejected by all major world health organisations because it was bogus
'Big pharma' does not partake in these studies, the vast majority of the time they are performed by independent research groups
Originally posted by hanyak69
Why do people always say unvaccinated kids pose a threat to everyone else. If they are vaccinated then how can my kids give the disease to them. Do the vaccines work or not????
Both post and answer are dead on.....thats as plain as it gets
Originally posted by jameshawkings
Originally posted by hanyak69
Why do people always say unvaccinated kids pose a threat to everyone else. If they are vaccinated then how can my kids give the disease to them. Do the vaccines work or not????
The problem with having unvaccinated kids around is that people can work out that they are perfectly healthy (no autism, no auto-immune diseases, less illnesses etc) i.e. we have a control in the study, whereas if all kids are vaccinated it's a lot more difficult for people to prove that vaccines are what's causing the damage
No...he is correct... www.drtenpenny.com
Originally posted by Griffo
reply to post by SmokeAndMirror
I don't suppose you would have any evidence to back up your claims? Or is this just more biased gibberish?