It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Shazmar
Can someone clarify this for me:-
"Mehserle claims he mistook his gun for his Taser when he fired a shot at Grant, who lay facedown at the train station."
First of all I'm a Brit and the majority of our police do not carry guns, though they do use Tasers. The above quote is confusing me so the questions I would like to ask are.
1) Do the police in the USA go about their business with the safety catch off on there guns?
2) If not then how did this officer NOT know it was a gun when he took the safety catch off?
3) Do Tasers have a safety catch that is the same/similar to the safety catch on a gun?
4) Are Tasers not lighter and bulkier than a gun?
5) If they are then how did this officer NOT know it was gun he was firing?
If the answer to 1) is NO and the answer to 3) is NO and the answer to 4) is Yes
Then it begs the question. What kind of prosecutor was in charge of the prosecution? Because it seems to me that this was an out and out murder having seen the video and if the answers to the 1) 3) and 4) are correct.
I bet your Mom will miss him on Saturday nights.
Originally posted by adifferentbreed
reply to post by balon0
He was talking about my mom.....not anyone elses.
Qualifies as a personal attack, no matter how clever you try and make it.
Originally posted by adifferentbreed
reply to post by Trublbrwing
I'll post where I want thanks.
I think I just may start to take advantage of this "new" ATS, seems personal attacks, swearing and all manner of nonsense is allowed as the mods either don't care or on holiday. How is celebrating this thugs death different than what some here are calling for for the cop?
Originally posted by Trublbrwing
Originally posted by adifferentbreed
reply to post by Trublbrwing
I'll post where I want thanks.
I think I just may start to take advantage of this "new" ATS, seems personal attacks, swearing and all manner of nonsense is allowed as the mods either don't care or on holiday. How is celebrating this thugs death different than what some here are calling for for the cop?
Wow. You really need me to answer that for you?
1. The "thug" is dead, the "cop" is not.
2. The "cop" is a murderer, the "thug" is a victim.
3. The "cop" can defend himself, the "thug" can not.
4. If the video showed the "thug" shooting the "cop" in the back while he was face down on the concrete he would be killed by an executioner, not a peace officer.
Originally posted by Xcathdra
Originally posted by Trublbrwing
Originally posted by adifferentbreed
reply to post by Trublbrwing
I'll post where I want thanks.
I think I just may start to take advantage of this "new" ATS, seems personal attacks, swearing and all manner of nonsense is allowed as the mods either don't care or on holiday. How is celebrating this thugs death different than what some here are calling for for the cop?
Wow. You really need me to answer that for you?
1. The "thug" is dead, the "cop" is not.
2. The "cop" is a murderer, the "thug" is a victim.
3. The "cop" can defend himself, the "thug" can not.
4. If the video showed the "thug" shooting the "cop" in the back while he was face down on the concrete he would be killed by an executioner, not a peace officer.
And yet another spectacular display of ignorance when it comes to the law and how it works and operates.
Is blind paranoia and fear mongering all you guys know how to argue with? Not one person has presented any type of legitimate argument to date dealing with what occured. So far is all based on people opinions of what THEY think is right and wrong, nevermind what the law says.
We will continue to have these debates until you guys actually get off your butts and do some research and actually understand how your government works.
To date, and seeing the responses so far, I weep for the future when some of you take the reigns.
Please enlighten us on how you come to the conclusion the Cop is a murderer.edit on 14-6-2011 by Xcathdra because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Trublbrwing
From Websters online dictionary.......
: the crime of unlawfully killing a person especially with malice aforethought
The officer murdered Oscar because it was an unlawful killing, the fact that he spent eleven months in prison is proof of that. Although malice aforethought is not necessary he is guilty here as well since he knowingly pointed a weapon at an unarmed suspect indicating he intended to harm him.
The use of deadly force by an officer is prohibited when the suspect is handcuffed and laying face down with no weapon, as the officer is clearly in no immediate danger.
He discharged his weapon with the intent to harm a suspect who was in the prone position resulting in the death of an unarmed suspect, his actions were unnecessary and illegal, he is guilty of murder.