It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Ceriddwen
Originally posted by ObvTruth
Originally posted by keepureye2thesky
Blimp! That's what I think.
Looks to small to be a blimp and its completely motionless also.
It is in the distance which would make it look small. Blimps move slowly anyway, and due to the distance, it would appear to not be moving for quite a while.
Originally posted by EBE01
There has been alot of activity in Almaty, Kazakhstan this year already.
And this:
Originally posted by EBE01
This happened the same night as the second disk video:
Originally posted by Xtraeme
As for the first video ... I know I always shrug in confusion when pointing out a blimp. ATS you can do better than that.
There are a few things in this broadcast that don't quite sit right if this were a genuine UFO sighting.
1) The tv presenter seems pretty relaxed and unfazed with her back to the UFO, and being fully confident that the UFO wil be there when she points to it.
2) The camera would surely be focussed on the object NOT the reporter and zoomed in much quicker for this "once in a lifetime" daylight sighting of an ET space craft!
3) there are a number of tallish buildings were the TV crew could have got access to in order to get them a closer look at the UFO......but instead they decide to stay at ground level?
So It's most likely a genuine report.........but just not one of a UFO!
Originally posted by EBE01
Here is another video of the same event:
Originally posted by Xtraeme
Doesn't bullet-point 2 contradict bullet-point 3? I'd agree it's probably a real broadcast, but I wouldn't be surprised if someone employed some creative video editing after the fact.
Originally posted by ObvTruth
reply to post by Logical one
Im certain a laugh doesnt mean its not a UFO.
Originally posted by Logical one
Originally posted by Xtraeme
Doesn't bullet-point 2 contradict bullet-point 3? I'd agree it's probably a real broadcast, but I wouldn't be surprised if someone employed some creative video editing after the fact.
I see where you're coming from but what I was trying to suggest is that when they zoomed in they STILL couldn't get a clear shot of the UFO determine any real detail.
So trying to get a closer shot might try and help......however it's all a bit academic as it doesn't really appear to be a genuine UFO sighting.
Originally posted by keepureye2thesky
Proper translation is in order, before any case can be made.
That being said, Find someone who speaks the native language....
1st one back gets a star.
ready...
set....
GO!!!!!!!