Sarah Palins Emails Released....public searchable archives now online!

reply to post by incrediblelousminds


let's get some obama-airs emails for a little look see.

or obama-rizzo or whoever the gangsta was.

as a former senator he should have the same scrutiny as former gov palin.

i can wait till he is out of office too.

Originally posted by incrediblelousminds

Originally posted by Carseller4


Much better to scrutinize a private citizen, than the President of the United States?

You ARE aware these are emails form when she was an ELECTED OFFICIAL, right? NOT a 'private citizen'.

For a bunch of people who claim to not be Republicans, you sure do twist the facts to defend Palin.

You do realize what the date is?

Media will not mess with Obama, wishing the Weiner story would go away, Democrat economy in the toilet. Hey let's scrutinize Sarah Palin. Figures.

Originally posted by Carseller4

Originally posted by incrediblelousminds

Originally posted by Carseller4


Much better to scrutinize a private citizen, than the President of the United States?

You ARE aware these are emails form when she was an ELECTED OFFICIAL, right? NOT a 'private citizen'.

For a bunch of people who claim to not be Republicans, you sure do twist the facts to defend Palin.

You do realize what the date is?

These were emails requested years ago.

Media will not mess with Obama, wishing the Weiner story would go away, Democrat economy in the toilet. Hey let's scrutinize Sarah Palin. Figures.

"The media" didnt create these emails or their release date.

Why are you misconstruing events to deflect criticism away from Palin?

Originally posted by fooks
reply to post by incrediblelousminds

 

let's get some obama-airs emails for a little look see.

Sure. Sounds good. Obama shuould be scrutinized as well.

Now can we actually discuss Palin or will you continue to deflect?

reply to post by thePharaoh


OP- ATS is full of Republicans-in-hiding who will deflect as much as possible from potentially damaging information to one of their party. This thread will be nothing more than people trying to make this about 'the media' or 'obama' or 'liberals'.

they will never scrutinize their own, or even ADMIT it's their 'own'.

Originally posted by Skyfloating
I dislike how snooping in on other peoples private emails is celebrated here

How is it 'private emails' when she was using her email account to discuss official government business?

Somehow I doubt you will respond.

reply to post by incrediblelousminds


what is there to criticize palin about?

you people fishing again?

sounds like it, looks like it, smells like it.

ya, ya'll need some deflection again, i see.


"Why are you misconstruing events to deflect criticism away from Palin?"

care to explain?

Originally posted by fooks



"Why are you misconstruing events to deflect criticism away from Palin?"

care to explain?

Sure. The poster I was responding to implied 'the media' released these emails, even though they were released by the state of Alaska and Palin herself has held up their release so her lawyers could redact key sections.

Clear now?

No email headers = no checksum = no authenticity = doctored = useless

second line

reply to post by incrediblelousminds


bash palin bash palin! lol.

what are you going on about?

you know this is still the witch hunt and smear campaign the media loves to do about her and from both sides.

she is the ultimate threat to the ol boy's club. GOOD! you have had enough of that? i have!

find another "smoking gun" is on today's menu, i see. sheesh!


eta; oooooooooo, guess we changed our post, eh?

reply to post by fooks


i have not 'bashed palin' whatsoever. I pointed out some factual inconsistencies in your post.

care to address the topic at all? Or just lies and persona attacks?

Originally posted by incrediblelousminds
reply to post by fooks

 

i have not 'bashed palin' whatsoever. I pointed out some factual inconsistencies in your post.

care to address the topic at all? Or just lies and persona attacks?

you changed your post i was responding to.

i been cited for excessive frikin quoting so i didn't do it then.

repost it.

So their clever plan of only releasing the emails in printed form to keep them offline was foiled.

Who knew that reporters had access to document scanners.

reply to post by Kaploink


which makes plausible deniability more relevant.

lol!



keep fishing guys. bound to get a nibble soon!

reply to post by fooks


turn the heat back on palin and make people stop talkin about weiner


deflection was right.

Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by fooks

 

turn the heat back on palin and make people stop talkin about weiner


deflection was right.

your theory posted here implies palin delayed the release of these emails until now to deflect from Weiner? What would she stand to gain from that?

reply to post by incrediblelousminds


my theory is based on msnbc and the timing of the story anyway a person can look at this is a deflection tactic by a known critic who thinks sarah palin is a bigger news story than weiner.

Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by incrediblelousminds

 

my theory is based on msnbc and the timing of the story anyway a person can look at this is a deflection tactic by a known critic who thinks sarah palin is a bigger news story than weiner.[

But the 'timing of the story' wasnt dictated by MSNBC. It was dictated the state of Alaska and Palin herself. So your theory is a bit flimsy.

reply to post by incrediblelousminds


not really palin is old news msnbc has the choice of what news is "fit to print"

palin is a nobody at the moment shes not running for anything and shes not in charge of anything.

Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by incrediblelousminds

 

not really palin is old news msnbc has the choice of what news is "fit to print"

palin is a nobody at the moment shes not running for anything and shes not in charge of anything.

Palin arranged to have these released now to garner publicity for her current PAC-funded book tour, not "MSNBC" as you claim.