It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by caladonea
Some people are born evil.....I think she knew what she was doing.......Ted Bundy when he was 3 used to put knives around sleeping peoples heads.
Originally posted by loam
Originally posted by marg6043
The only one here to be charge with "involuntary murder is the adult that was in the house at the time that the child was left along in the bathtub with the toddler.
Exactly.
Originally posted by VonDoomen
I say bs on this story.
At 5 years old I was well aware of what this would do. In the story the girl said she got irritated with the baby crying.... i mean come on, she knew what she was doing. Lock her up and keep watch, this one aint right!
Originally posted by Unity_99
What 5 year old could hold a full sized mature baby/toddler and even think to keep them under water? Im serious.
Originally posted by Unity_99
Not only did she not do it, impossible,
Originally posted by Unity_99
What? As a mother of 5, with common sense, anyone who thinks a 5 year old held a struggling screaming baby and had the strength to do this, is very greenhorn/inexperienced with children.
Originally posted by Unity_99
reply to post by BrokenCircles
What? As a mother of 5, with common sense, anyone who thinks a 5 year old held a struggling screaming baby and had the strength to do this, is very greenhorn/inexperienced with children. My sons would have needed to be supported, sitting down to even have a placid happy babe in their arms. My first born was 10 lbs 5 ounces, and 4 were big babies. He's now 6 foot 2, and they were never small weak children.
Originally posted by Unity_99
This is a little girl. Someone else did the murder and is using her.
Everything I wrote makes perfect sense.
around 11:30 p.m., after the boy was [color=CFECEC]found floating in the water. Paramedics rushed the toddler to the hospital where he was pronounced dead on arrival, police said.
This is written slightly differently, so not sure, but in some of the articles that I read yesterday, it stated there was a total of 5 children. Toddler, 5 yr. old, 16 yr. old, and 2 others for which no age was given. This article does not actually say that the 16 yr. old babysitter was also a relative who lived in this house. Whichever is wrong, that is where the confusion is. Regardless, there being a 12 yr. old also in the house, creates more thoughts.
At the time of his death, Jermane was in the company of his 16-year-old babysitter and four other children, the oldest of whom was 12.
According to the Jackson County Medical Examiner's Office, they are in possession of the preliminary autopsy results right now, but because the case is an "open investigation," they are not commenting on what those findings are.
The Family Court division is actively involved in the case, according to Mary Jacobi, a spokeswoman for the Jackson County Court.
"A petition was presented and has been acted upon to consider the 5-year-old child in need of care. It is a formal court preceding that gives the court the ability to provide services to the child," Jacobi told The Huffington Post.
Jacobi added: "The child is not imprisoned. The child is in a better place and receiving whatever services were deemed [necessary] by those interacting with the child."
"The suspect has to be able to form the intent and appreciate the criminality," Bremner told The Huffington Post. "In adults, they call it competence. In juvenile cases, they call it capacity.
"Can a five-year-old form the intent? Do they know what death is? Do they know if you put a baby in water it will die? The prosecution will look at it and evaluate it but they most likely won't put a 5-year-old on trial for murder."
However, there is a possibility that police and prosecutors could focus their attention on other people connected to the case.
"[color=CFECEC]Negligent homicide would be tough based on the facts we know, but there is potential for neglect charges against the parents," Bremner said. "The parents weren't there. We don't know the level of incapacitation of the babysitter, but prosecutors will just have to show that it was reasonably foreseeable that something tragic could happen."
Originally posted by Novise
This is what happens when you [color=E18B6B]assume
[color=E3E4FA]What leads you to the conclusion that she was hired?
Not only did they [color=E18B6B]hire someone who would fall asleep
hmmm. You sure 'bout that?
they [color=E18B6B]paid a babysitter (magic word, magic thing that takes care of everything and protects your child from all harm).
If I held your head underwater, how long do you think you could scream without air?
managed to sleep through the screams of an infant. Screams which by nature's design are effective at waking others up better than an alarm clock.
Just as I'd bet it wasn't crucial for you to make an attempt at learning any actual details, before reaching your own conclusions. Who is this ~'both'~'they'~'their'~ that you speak of?
I'd bet it wasn't crucial for them to both be out of the house, and they went out by their own will.
...just as hard as a mentally disabled 16 yr. old, who may or may not have been put into a situation that she was not prepared for, and possibly having no option to accept or decline.
They should be blamed just as hard as the babysitter.
[color=FFF8C6]↑Quoted↑↑Text↑↑Directly↑↑Above↑↑Your↑↑Post↑
Maybe the parents should be considered for negligence? How is it not considered a risk to place the safety of toddlers in the hands of a minor?
Originally posted by SevenBeans
Even Mothers who kill their kids often get off with a slap on the wrist, the kid will not face charges and I doubt the parents will either.edit on 11-6-2011 by SevenBeans because: (no reason given)