Proof: Station on MARS

page: 22
267
<< 19  20  21    23  24  25 >>

log in

join

posted on Jun, 7 2011 @ 04:13 AM
link   
Wow, this story is even going to be on Early Today, apparently. I just saw them mention it. I don't think I've heard any "Mars anomaly" stories on the MSM since the Mars Face was first discovered.




posted on Jun, 7 2011 @ 06:04 AM
link   
Good job OP, you made it to the MSM...



posted on Jun, 7 2011 @ 06:12 AM
link   

Originally posted by Phage
So what do we have here?

A member posts a link to a youtube video. Makes no comments about it himself then vanishes. Something the member has been doing a lot lately.

Some effort is put into showing the source of the image and explaining (on page 5) that Google cannot be used for serious examination of "anomalies". And yet the comments and stars continue for 12 pages without having followed the thread to see what may have been learned.




That's ATS for ya Phage



posted on Jun, 7 2011 @ 06:15 AM
link   
reply to post by blupblup
 


And the MSM media jumps all over it too.

...But...most on ATS despise the MSM

Paradox?!



posted on Jun, 7 2011 @ 06:51 AM
link   
Just an interesting note. The user's YouTube account has vanished along with the video he created.



posted on Jun, 7 2011 @ 07:01 AM
link   

Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by blupblup
 


And the MSM media jumps all over it too.

...But...most on ATS despise the MSM

Paradox?!



Just intrigued that someone from this site made to MSM that's not depressing or negative...



posted on Jun, 7 2011 @ 07:02 AM
link   

Originally posted by DragonFire1024
Just an interesting note. The user's YouTube account has vanished along with the video he created.



He probably took it down and sold it for profit.


edit on 7-6-2011 by blackrain17 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 7 2011 @ 07:09 AM
link   

Originally posted by blackrain17

Originally posted by DragonFire1024
Just an interesting note. The user's YouTube account has vanished along with the video he created.



He probably took it down and sold it for profit.


edit on 7-6-2011 by blackrain17 because: (no reason given)


Cannot take a video down, sell it for profit when he didn't technically make the video. He used sourced information from a copyrighted source: Google, and whoever is responsible for taking the satellite image(s). The video has already gone viral, and has been copied and reposted on YouTube by more than several people. Profit? Try again.



posted on Jun, 7 2011 @ 07:59 AM
link   
I wonder why the video link has been removed. Hmmmm.



posted on Jun, 7 2011 @ 08:00 AM
link   
"It looks like a linear streak artifact produced by a cosmic ray, said Alfred McEwen, a planetary geologist at the Lunar and Planetary Lab at the University of Arizona and the director of the Planetary Imaging Research Laboratory. McEwen is the principal investigator of the High Resolution Imaging Science Experiment (HiRISE), a powerful telescope currently orbiting Mars."


www.space.com...
edit on 7-6-2011 by Dalke07 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 7 2011 @ 08:29 AM
link   

Originally posted by Dalke07


"It looks like a linear streak artifact produced by a cosmic ray, said Alfred McEwen, a planetary geologist at the Lunar and Planetary Lab at the University of Arizona and the director of the Planetary Imaging Research Laboratory. McEwen is the principal investigator of the High Resolution Imaging Science Experiment (HiRISE), a powerful telescope currently orbiting Mars."


www.space.com...
edit on 7-6-2011 by Dalke07 because: (no reason given)


AKA...swamp gas. Give me a break. I would love to see some Hi-Res images of this 'thing.' If this guy is convinced that's what it is, then get his little Hi-Res camera over there instead of making claims.



posted on Jun, 7 2011 @ 08:34 AM
link   
reply to post by Dalke07
 
I have seen pics of cosmic rays and none have looked like the image seen for the Mars station. Ask yourself if any cosmic ray or artifact can depict straight lines along with curved portions and segmented pieces in any picture. People, do your research before posting anything these debunkers tell you.



posted on Jun, 7 2011 @ 09:03 AM
link   
Link posted on 6/1/12
Debunked on 6/2/12


Originally posted by Phage
Here it is from the source image using pixel resizing to 300%. Each pixel is 12.5 meters. No doubt it's an imaging artifact.

edit on 6/2/2011 by Phage because: (no reason given)


so my question is, why exactly is the mainstream media even covering this? 4 days later...



posted on Jun, 7 2011 @ 09:04 AM
link   
reply to post by blupblup
 


Thats because most people are to lazy to read the entire thread and/or to entrenched in their own beliefs that faced with any semblence of hard facts, they refuse to accept they may be misinformed....



posted on Jun, 7 2011 @ 09:07 AM
link   
are u serious
rofl



posted on Jun, 7 2011 @ 09:19 AM
link   

Originally posted by 001ggg100
reply to post by blupblup
 


Thats because most people are to lazy to read the entire thread and/or to entrenched in their own beliefs that faced with any semblence of hard facts, they refuse to accept they may be misinformed....


Misinformation = Telling people its "pixels", when regardless of what these "debunkers" say, don't line up...at all. The pixels above are blocks. Clear as day. Whereas the original photo is not. The pixels are a block line. The original photo contains more than one set of 'blocks' or whatever you want to call them. They are two totally different things. Anyone who doesn't see that, and is willing to accept that they are pixels, isn't contributing anything but misinformation. Funny how these so called pixels show up just in that area. Did this happen anywhere else? Show some more photos of these pixels elsewhere. That's what is called "hard facts." So far there have been no "hard facts" presented in this thread.
edit on 7-6-2011 by DragonFire1024 because: typo
edit on 7-6-2011 by DragonFire1024 because: typo



posted on Jun, 7 2011 @ 09:21 AM
link   

Originally posted by Dalke07


"It looks like a linear streak artifact produced by a cosmic ray, said Alfred McEwen, a planetary geologist at the Lunar and Planetary Lab at the University of Arizona and the director of the Planetary Imaging Research Laboratory. McEwen is the principal investigator of the High Resolution Imaging Science Experiment (HiRISE), a powerful telescope currently orbiting Mars."


www.space.com...
edit on 7-6-2011 by Dalke07 because: (no reason given)


I've taken some planetary geo courses from McEwen, guy knows his image processing and more importantly knows Mars. As an aside, what a great course...the PI of HiRise actually let students pick locations to take HiRise pictures (might have been THEMIS images, can't remember) and we were first people to see a before un-imaged (at this detail) area of Mars.
edit on 7-6-2011 by youallcrazy because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 7 2011 @ 09:25 AM
link   

Originally posted by youallcrazy

Originally posted by Dalke07


"It looks like a linear streak artifact produced by a cosmic ray, said Alfred McEwen, a planetary geologist at the Lunar and Planetary Lab at the University of Arizona and the director of the Planetary Imaging Research Laboratory. McEwen is the principal investigator of the High Resolution Imaging Science Experiment (HiRISE), a powerful telescope currently orbiting Mars."


www.space.com...
edit on 7-6-2011 by Dalke07 because: (no reason given)


I've taken some planetary geo courses from McEwen, guy knows his image processing and more importantly knows Mars. As an aside, what a great course...the PI of HiRise actually let students pick locations to take HiRise pictures and we were first people to see a before un-imaged (at this detail) area of Mars.


Really? Then point a camera there now. Take a picture and then tell the world what we are seeing. I don't doubt his profession, but I do doubt his explanation without backing up his claims. If this is an error, they can take another picture. One that is clear and in Hi-Res. If they have done it before they can do it again.
edit on 7-6-2011 by DragonFire1024 because: add
edit on 7-6-2011 by DragonFire1024 because: typo



posted on Jun, 7 2011 @ 09:27 AM
link   

Originally posted by DragonFire1024

Originally posted by 001ggg100
reply to post by blupblup
 


Thats because most people are to lazy to read the entire thread and/or to entrenched in their own beliefs that faced with any semblence of hard facts, they refuse to accept they may be misinformed....


Misinformation = Telling people its "pixels", when regardless of what these "debunkers" say, don't line up...at all. The pixels above are blocks. Clear as day. Whereas the original photo is not. The pixels are a block line. The original photo contains more than one set of 'blocks' or whatever you want to call them. They are two totally different things. Anyone who doesn't see that, and is willing to accept that they are pixels, isn't contributing anything but misinformation. Funny how these so called pixels show up just in that area. Did this happen anywhere else? Show some more photos of these pixels elsewhere. That's what is called "hard facts." So far there have been no "hard facts" presented in this thread.
edit on 7-6-2011 by DragonFire1024 because: typo
edit on 7-6-2011 by DragonFire1024 because: typo


The picture above and the missing "blocks" is the original photo.
What you are calling the "original" photo is a screenshot from Google Mars, this program takes the original photo and makes it 3D, and obviously adds information to the true original photo and it's missing pixels to create 3D image
edit on 7-6-2011 by youallcrazy because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 7 2011 @ 09:32 AM
link   
They talked about this on COAST 2 COAST last night George Narly had Reacherd Hogland on (former science adviser to Walter Cronkite and "enterprisemission.com dude")

Reacherd Hogland said it was a computer glich. But, that there's more to the story..stay tuned ..





new topics
top topics
 
267
<< 19  20  21    23  24  25 >>

log in

join