Christianity supports a one world government because Christians believe God created the universe, so the world order is already in place, which gives Christian government justification of performing "God's work" which is really just the work of the state.

Islam wants all nations to be under Sharia Law which is an austere set of laws

Judaism wants all nations to be subservient to God and his chosen people.

Buddhism wants each individual to reach nirvana.

One may argue that China is Buddhist because they are atheist, but how is slaughtering innocent considered compassionate, which was one of the Buddha's virtues? I say this to argue that China is not a Buddhist nation. Further proof of this is the political separation between Tibet and China, and the controversy between China and the Dali Lama. Buddhists are if anything the victims of tyranny as opposed to the tyrants.

Thus, Buddhism does not support a one world order. The Buddha stated that he only teaches Aryas, the noble, who have but little dust in the eyes, and thus the large majority of the world will never be Buddhist.

Buddhism is about compassion and equality towards all things, which is against the control mechanism in place in every government in the world.

Buddhism is about the end of birth and death, and thus represents a stopping of reincarnation, which is freedom from the shackles of a one world order.

Christianity is about God's love, and that love could be beneficial, but not if it is manipulated to deceive. If someone thinks they are helping a charity (Red Cross) but the charity is run by thieves (Bush and Clinton) then it is not a act of piety.

Islam is about martyrdom defeating the non-believers. While this is noble it can be miscontrued to turn into suicide bombing.

Israel is about the omniscience of God, but this just turns a person into a weak mortal and separates them from the eternal.

Buddhism can be misinterpreted to be a type of nihilism, but at least then you would have a person who is not motivated enough to become a world dictator, although his instincts may be leading in that direction.

ive recently started studying buddhism and when i first read your post i wanted to say that it would be such a good thing if everyone could think like this, but then i changed my mind and realised that if buddhism became more widespread it too would become manipulated such as christianity is. it too would become a force for control and oppression as all religions are. great post though

Originally posted by jcrash
Not sure where you get the idea that Christianity is pro-NWO.

I am so glad I was not the only one who thought that.

There are several different forms of Christianity.
Traditional Christians
Orthodox Christians
Evangelical Christians
and many more,

which form are you referring to ???

I am Evangelical Christian and I do
not believe in a NWO system of government.
And frankly, I don't think my God cares
one way or the other who sits in elected
offices or who sits in the CEO chair at the
world bank.

Originally posted by jonnyb578
ive recently started studying buddhism and when i first read your post i wanted to say that it would be such a good thing if everyone could think like this, but then i changed my mind and realised that if buddhism became more widespread it too would become manipulated such as christianity is. it too would become a force for control and oppression as all religions are. great post though

That would be unlikely since only a small minority has the insight to see the truths of Buddhism. Too many people would be swept away by other more appealing philosophies that are not as austere.

Originally posted by fedeykin


Buddhism does not care about government in any way shape or form, as long as government does not interfere with the indiviual pursuit of enlightenment.

Which is why the Dalai Lama seeks Tibetan independence from China. While he's not perfect, this is a noble thing, not unlike mahatma gandhi