It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Obama the new Hitler

page: 2
6
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 24 2011 @ 02:42 PM
link   
Did anyone bother to read the words below the videos:


This has left me wondering, now I don't think the comparison to Hitler may be most accurate, maybe the Weimar republic or that the USA is like a pre-WW2 Britain with its messed up and confused internal and external policies, appearance of losing global status, etc.
I'd like to hear more thought before I comment anymore I haven't really digested this yet!
Thanx. . . AB

I'm not taking a side on this subject even though I agree the comparison and videos are 'kinda jaded'. (sarcasm)
What I was trying to stimulate, by this thread, was what a better comparative model would be. . .




posted on May, 24 2011 @ 02:43 PM
link   

President Obama has a good spirit and soul...


You know this how? Please give me insight as to how you know that Obama has a good spirit and soul! You don't know this anymore than what color my underwear are right now.

The above videos are simply a comparison. Also, the OP notes that she questions right wing propaganda.



posted on May, 24 2011 @ 02:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by ArianAngel
You all voted for him, now you all are stuck with him.


hold the presses there buddy.
I didn't vote for him and I only
know 1 person who did and
he is a dope head. So don't
blame me.



posted on May, 24 2011 @ 02:45 PM
link   
reply to post by AnteBellum
 


Yeah, you can definitely make the coorelation to Germany pre-WWII to Americans wanting change after Bush. But, when you think about, Bush, Clinton, Obama, Bush Sr,.... isn't it all the same sh!t different day anways? We must assume these men are at best front men, like Mick Jagger is for the Rolling Stones..

Which BTW... speaking of the Stones


edit on 24-5-2011 by Swills because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 24 2011 @ 02:47 PM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


Excellent point, Boon! I 2nd that (even including the dope-head friend part)



posted on May, 24 2011 @ 02:55 PM
link   
I wonder if those poor boys that did the BarryO song and dance got paid for their pain or if they just have to live with the embarassement of that video for the rest of their lives.
Because of BarryO I'm inspired to be broke and homeless.



posted on May, 24 2011 @ 02:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by Skyfloating
Neither Bush nor Obama is responsible for the death of 77 Million.


true but we certainly are on the right track wouldnt you agree??



posted on May, 24 2011 @ 02:58 PM
link   
Yeah, the same comparisons were made with 'W' and Hitler. Seems the easiest way to vilify one that you dont like these days.

People seem to have lost their long term memory these days....



posted on May, 24 2011 @ 03:03 PM
link   
reply to post by AnteBellum
 


Oh lawd.

When all else fails politically either call your opponent hitler, or say he's just like hitler.

Republicans have already lost apparently.



posted on May, 24 2011 @ 03:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by AnteBellum
Did anyone bother to read the words below the videos:


This has left me wondering, now I don't think the comparison to Hitler may be most accurate, maybe the Weimar republic or that the USA is like a pre-WW2 Britain with its messed up and confused internal and external policies, appearance of losing global status, etc.
I'd like to hear more thought before I comment anymore I haven't really digested this yet!
Thanx. . . AB

I'm not taking a side on this subject even though I agree the comparison and videos are 'kinda jaded'. (sarcasm)
What I was trying to stimulate, by this thread, was what a better comparative model would be. . .


I read that, but all you put down was negative videos of Obama. Most of it is false or twisted. You could have put of a video or article disputing that, but you didnt.



posted on May, 24 2011 @ 03:10 PM
link   
The only comparison I can see between the two is the way the masses acted when they each gave a speech.

It was uncanny when you put a video of each side by side.

Other then that there isn't a resembelance.



posted on May, 24 2011 @ 03:27 PM
link   

Originally posted by freakjive

President Obama has a good spirit and soul...


You know this how? Please give me insight as to how you know that Obama has a good spirit and soul! You don't know this anymore than what color my underwear are right now.

The above videos are simply a comparison. Also, the OP notes that she questions right wing propaganda.



Some people are given; the gift to see into other peoples souls....obviously you are not one of them.....I am....



posted on May, 24 2011 @ 03:29 PM
link   
reply to post by gorgi
 


If you can find one that is in direct opposition to the thread idea, please do.

My aim here is to better understand the collective thoughts on this subject. And the subject being what america is becoming, turning into, is reminiscent of and/or what its citizens believe is going to happen.



posted on May, 24 2011 @ 03:44 PM
link   
reply to post by AnteBellum
 


Here is what a quick google search found on why Obama is not Hitler.
10_reasons_why_obama_isnt_hitler



posted on May, 24 2011 @ 03:46 PM
link   
I think the Republican party would have loved Hitler. Obama has become a republican, they should be praising him.



posted on May, 24 2011 @ 04:25 PM
link   
reply to post by ArianAngel
 


Hitler was also voted into power. Keep that in mind The government that put him into power was a republic in decline.



posted on May, 24 2011 @ 04:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by caladonea
Some people are given; the gift to see into other peoples souls....obviously you are not one of them.....I am....


I say bollocks! What about our past presidents? What do you see in them? Good spirits and souls? Or is it based on your agenda? I suppose next you're going to say that I don't have a good soul or spirit.

Proof or it didn't happen.



posted on May, 24 2011 @ 04:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by SG-17

Originally posted by Fox Molder
reply to post by ArianAngel
 


Hitler legally got voted in as well, remember your history as for it is a guide to the future!

No he wasn't. Hitler was appointed Chancellor by King Wilhelm II because no one party in the government had the majority (or a proper coalition) to appoint a Chancellor and Wilhelm's first 4 choices failed miserably. Summarily, Hitler wasn't elected and the Nazis never had a majority.

You are mistaken. Wilhelm II did not appoint Hitler chancellor. President Paul von Hindenburg appointed Hitler Chancellor. The Nazi's did not hold a true majority, but they did form a majority government by forming a coalition with the German National People's Party (DNVP).




Despite achieving a much better result than in the disappointing November 1932 election, the Nazis did not do as well as Hitler had hoped, polling 43.9%, rather than the 50+% that he had expected. Therefore, he was forced to maintain his coalition with the national conservative German National People's Party (DNVP) to control a majority of seats. The Communists forfeited about a fourth of their votes, while the Social Democrats suffered only moderate losses.

In addition to this, Hitler needed a two-thirds majority to pass the Enabling Act (a constitutional amendment which allowed him to pass laws without consulting the Reichstag parliament), which he gained by persuading the Catholic Centre Party to vote with him with regard to the Reichskonkordat. The bill was passed on 23 March with 444 against 94 votes. Only the Social Democrats led by Otto Wels opposed the measure, which came into effect on 27 March. Moreover, Social Democratic representation was suppressed, because several Social Democratic deputies that were elected to the Reichstag were already prevented from taking their seats by the Nazi SA. Had the Communist Party participated, its representatives would have contributed 12% of the Reichstag votes. Instead, their representatives were on the run or under arrest for their suspect role in the Reichstag Fire.

Though the Enabling Act was only meant to be effective for four years, it was formally prolonged twice. The powers gained from the bill allowed the KPD and Social Democratic Party (SPD) to be outlawed, and firmly established Germany as a dictatorship.



posted on May, 24 2011 @ 09:28 PM
link   
More of this mindless nonsense!

See,if the Birther yap fails to take, fallback to the socialist crap, that fails fallback to the Marxist crap and when that fails fallback to the Nazi rhetoric and when that fails to take restart the list.

The op sounds like a bad broken record.

Proof the entire group lacks a thinking, independant brain and needs to be told what to think, how to think and what the daily talking points are.
edit on 24-5-2011 by TheImmaculateD1 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 25 2011 @ 12:07 AM
link   
reply to post by TheImmaculateD1
 


All your mentioned false accusations are their daily talking points.

You forgot to mention the one where Obama has weird hands so he may be an alien hybrid.

(the fact that someone scrutinized the man's palm print is proof enough that there is not only a need for him to be Kenyan, but a borderline psychotic need for him to be non-human.)



new topics

top topics



 
6
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join