It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

8.4 EQ Libya?

page: 10
63
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 20 2011 @ 06:54 AM
link   
Nothing showing on any UK news site of this. Interesting but appears not to have happened.

Anyone else




posted on May, 20 2011 @ 06:56 AM
link   
It was reported on twitter here twitter.com...#!/incdfp so I googled INFP Earthquake... page is removed but cache shows in the search ... crazy.




posted on May, 20 2011 @ 06:57 AM
link   
reply to post by silo13
 


I don't believe it happened either, I am in Greece and I think I would have felt an EQ this big.
But just to make things clear, it wouldn't necessarily cause a tsunami. If for example its epicenter
was on land, it could not cause a tsunami, even if it had an even higher magnitude. So the fact
that both Greece and Italy weren't hit by a tsunami, does not by itself mean the EQ didn't happen.
However, the rest of the evidence gathered in this thread does.



posted on May, 20 2011 @ 07:00 AM
link   
Something certainly happened, are these after shocks??
www.infp.ro...

20.05.2011, 08:03:44 3.4 2 39.14N 28.96E TURKEY M
20.05.2011, 02:10:29 2.8 10 39.43N 29.92E TURKEY M
20.05.2011, 00:46:38 5.9 50 38.31N 138.69E NEAR WEST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN A
20.05.2011, 00:23:33 3.1 1 39.22N 28.94E TURKEY M
20.05.2011, 00:13:09 3.4 10 39.16N 29.12E TURKEY M
19.05.2011, 22:05:53 3.0 10 39.22N 29.00E TURKEY M
19.05.2011, 21:33:11 3.8 9 39.13N 29.19E TURKEY M
19.05.2011, 21:21:33 3.9 50 39.08N 29.02E TURKEY A
19.05.2011, 21:12:52 4.1 10 39.13N 29.08E TURKEY M
19.05.2011, 21:06:32 3.1 10 40.22N 29.64E TURKEY M
19.05.2011, 20:57:31 3.2 10 39.23N 28.98E TURKEY M
19.05.2011, 20:39:03 4.5 10 34.53N 23.62E CRETE, GREECE M
19.05.2011, 20:25:33 4.1 10 39.15N 29.13E TURKEY M
19.05.2011, 20:15:24 5.7 10 39.17N 29.05E TURKEY M
19.05.2011, 19:59:47 3.2 8 39.15N 29.21E TURKEY M
19.05.2011, 19:08:45 3.4 30 34.57N 23.59E CRETE, GREECE A
19.05.2011, 19:03:01 4.2 14 34.36N 23.34E CRETE, GREECE M
19.05.2011, 14:50:54 5.0 270 39.11N 14.87E TYRRHENIAN SEA M
19.05.2011, 04:38:25 3.4 10 39.12N 29.42E TURKEY M



and this is from the usgs???? So obviously there is corruption within this organisation.

MAP 2.8 2011/05/19 22:45:39 33.609 -107.522 5.2 NEW MEXICO
MAP 4.3 2011/05/19 21:12:52 39.098 29.085 8.4 WESTERN TURKEY
MAP 4.9 2011/05/19 21:07:10 -58.019 -25.913 119.6 SOUTH SANDWICH ISLANDS REGION
MAP 3.4 2011/05/19 21:00:12 37.162 -117.381 14.3 NEVADA
MAP 4.9 2011/05/19 20:39:04 34.367 23.799 27.2 CRETE, GREECE
MAP 2.7 2011/05/19 20:26:38 60.161 -141.725 18.2 SOUTHERN ALASKA
MAP 2.7 2011/05/19 20:23:12 32.443 -118.179 4.7 OFF THE COAST OF CALIFORNIA
MAP 5.8 2011/05/19 20:15:25 39.137 29.074 9.1 WESTERN TURKEY
MAP 3.3 2011/05/19 17:23:51 38.416 -118.742 2.4 NEVADA
MAP 5.2 2011/05/19 17:05:12 -34.706 -71.515 45.6 LIBERTADOR O'HIGGINS, CHILE
MAP 4.9 2011/05/19 15:37:56 -24.579 179.996 508.5 SOUTH OF THE FIJI ISLANDS
MAP 5.0 2011/05/19 12:25:23 -20.139 168.208 48.6 LOYALTY ISLANDS
MAP 2.7 2011/05/19 12:13:13 18.113 -68.100 94.2 MONA PASSAGE, DOMINICAN REPUBLIC
MAP 3.4 2011/05/19 10:35:26 30.680 -105.727 17.4 CHIHUAHUA, MEXICO
MAP 2.5 2011/05/19 09:22:13 37.978 -118.662 10.8 CENTRAL CALIFORNIA
MAP 5.4 2011/05/19 09:12:48 37.142 142.652 35.0 OFF THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN
MAP 4.7 2011/05/19 08:55:05 44.393 149.236 54.1 KURIL ISLANDS
MAP 2.5 2011/05/19 08:41:11 36.821 -90.791 8.7 SOUTHEASTERN MISSOURI
MAP 4.7 2011/05/19 08:32:50 38.365 141.690 62.4 NEAR THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN
MAP 5.0 2011/05/19 07:19:52 -20.317 168.228 124.5 LOYALTY ISLANDS
MAP 4.8 2011/05/19 06:35:25 46.811 152.648 35.0 KURIL ISLANDS
MAP 5.1 2011/05/19 06:33:11 -6.965 123.444 623.7 BANDA SEA
MAP 4.8 2011/05/19 06:23:04 -18.978 -174.516 35.0 TONGA
MAP 3.1 2011/05/19 04:13:58 18.932 -64.356 36.2 VIRGIN ISLANDS REGION
MAP 4.5 2011/05/19 03:43:04 5.077 127.174 31.2 PHILIPPINE ISLANDS REGION
MAP 2.6 2011/05/19 02:46:46 35.588 -97.169 5.0 OKLAHOMA
MAP 3.4 2011/05/19 01:48:12 18.601 -68.413 125.5 DOMINICAN REPUBLIC
edit on 20-5-2011 by chucktrick because: more info

edit on 20-5-2011 by chucktrick because: more info



posted on May, 20 2011 @ 07:05 AM
link   
I think someone misread 3 for 8.



posted on May, 20 2011 @ 07:13 AM
link   
reply to post by weareallone52
 


I would like to see that info if you would be so kind! Thanks for digging it up and offering to share! Kinda new here so not sure if you can just send it to me. I would like to check it out though! Thanks, JaeBea



posted on May, 20 2011 @ 07:27 AM
link   
There is a "contact us" link in that site in the post ?
How about someone send them a message, i realise its a different language, but we could use google-translate
.

I'd write it but im not too good with words.
Just pondering....



posted on May, 20 2011 @ 07:29 AM
link   
Did people just forget that NATO did a massive bombing of 8 warships right where this EQ was supposed to of happened, or do we not try to read through threads before we comment anymore? The fire power it takes to destroy warships is pretty damn extreme, with deep penetrating bombs to burrow into the bellies of these vessels. This would explain the reading, and the lack of an EQ or tsunami in other areas.



posted on May, 20 2011 @ 07:34 AM
link   

Originally posted by chucktrick
Something certainly happened, are these after shocks??
www.infp.ro...

20.05.2011, 08:03:44 3.4 2 39.14N 28.96E TURKEY M
20.05.2011, 02:10:29 2.8 10 39.43N 29.92E TURKEY M
20.05.2011, 00:46:38 5.9 50 38.31N 138.69E NEAR WEST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN A
20.05.2011, 00:23:33 3.1 1 39.22N 28.94E TURKEY M
20.05.2011, 00:13:09 3.4 10 39.16N 29.12E TURKEY M
19.05.2011, 22:05:53 3.0 10 39.22N 29.00E TURKEY M
19.05.2011, 21:33:11 3.8 9 39.13N 29.19E TURKEY M
19.05.2011, 21:21:33 3.9 50 39.08N 29.02E TURKEY A
19.05.2011, 21:12:52 4.1 10 39.13N 29.08E TURKEY M
19.05.2011, 21:06:32 3.1 10 40.22N 29.64E TURKEY M
19.05.2011, 20:57:31 3.2 10 39.23N 28.98E TURKEY M
19.05.2011, 20:39:03 4.5 10 34.53N 23.62E CRETE, GREECE M
19.05.2011, 20:25:33 4.1 10 39.15N 29.13E TURKEY M
19.05.2011, 20:15:24 5.7 10 39.17N 29.05E TURKEY M
19.05.2011, 19:59:47 3.2 8 39.15N 29.21E TURKEY M
19.05.2011, 19:08:45 3.4 30 34.57N 23.59E CRETE, GREECE A
19.05.2011, 19:03:01 4.2 14 34.36N 23.34E CRETE, GREECE M
19.05.2011, 14:50:54 5.0 270 39.11N 14.87E TYRRHENIAN SEA M
19.05.2011, 04:38:25 3.4 10 39.12N 29.42E TURKEY M



we had an 5.8 earthquake in turkey @kutahya and yes those were the aftershocks.

earthquake.usgs.gov...



posted on May, 20 2011 @ 07:38 AM
link   
hey all. joined the site after stumbling upon this headline. i have family in tunisia (you'll notice the purported epicentre of this 8.4 quake is really closer to the whole of tunisia than the whole of libya), and I managed to get in contact with someone there via facebook who informed me that they felt no effects at all whatsoever of the quake.

however! i am not going to rule out that the event did happen. i do not know exactly how either HAARP or the seismological equipment used in detecting and reporting earthquake happenings works, but supposing that whatever magnetic/sonic vibration/aberration caused this through some kind of manipulation of the superficial levels of the earth's surface (i.e. a quake whose origins do not rise from shifting of the deep tectonics of the earth), then it is perhaps possible that a strong, localized quake was generated. This would explain how such a powerful quake (also keep in mind guys, that the richter scale is logarithmic, this means that the difference in strength between 2.0 and 2.1 vs. 8.3 and 8.4 is VASTLY increased etc etc) would not have its effects shown elsewhere, but still managed to be caught and registered by seismological instruments.
edit on 20-5-2011 by megawattboss because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 20 2011 @ 07:43 AM
link   
reply to post by Mactire
 


If the firepower of a surface attack on any number of warships equated to an 8.4m earthquake registered on seismographs at an estimated 30km depth you'd be looking at several nuclear events to hit anywhere close. Plus with all the water between the Warship and the ocean floor buffering the impact (from a seismological point of view which does not measure how hard a missile hits a ship!) you would be looking at a much greater impact than even the reported 8.4.

Not buying it. Sea-based nuclear missile testing won't even register 8.4.



posted on May, 20 2011 @ 07:52 AM
link   
I'm starting to think that this was a 'building 7' type incident...

Maybe they displayed the 8.4 a little to early...know what I mean?



posted on May, 20 2011 @ 07:54 AM
link   
Hi All

Our government has picked up MASSIVE IONOSPHERE ACTIVITY OVER THAT AREA.




posted on May, 20 2011 @ 07:56 AM
link   
Hello all,

just to pinpoint where the earthquake happened and to make a comparison to historical earthquakes in Libya


A short introduction to historical earthquakes in Libya


note: just as an after thought, all these earthquakes happening as if their was war being waged underground (a little scifi does not hurt )

edit on 20-5-2011 by MonsieurM because: (no reason given)

edit on 20-5-2011 by MonsieurM because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 20 2011 @ 07:58 AM
link   

Originally posted by LightAssassin
Hi All

Our government has picked up MASSIVE IONOSPHERE ACTIVITY OVER THAT AREA.




Tesla smackdown under way



posted on May, 20 2011 @ 07:59 AM
link   
Either way its the real deal



posted on May, 20 2011 @ 08:01 AM
link   
There was no 8.4 earthquake, I am almost 100% willing to bet that all it was, was UN bombs hitting to close to a seismograph.
An 8.4 on the coast would of caused a huge tsunami in the Mediterranean, and Italy and Greece would of been wiped out.



posted on May, 20 2011 @ 08:04 AM
link   
reply to post by Darkblade71
 


you don't understand how the richter scale works if you think that's plausible. It is not a linear scale. You don't get a 4.0 earthquake from doubling the force of a 2.0 earthquake. I'm not sure exactly what number base the scale uses, but you're looking at thousands of times the magnitude. And between 4.0 to 6.0 a thousand, thousand times greater disparity.



posted on May, 20 2011 @ 08:06 AM
link   
Dutchsinse has put up a video about this.

www.youtube.com...=40

Sorry, I'm not able to embed videos!



posted on May, 20 2011 @ 08:09 AM
link   
reply to post by Pr0t0
 

No but a bunker buster would. These bombs are designed to penetrate armor and them displace thousands of square feet of soil in just one BOOM! If one of more of these bombs missed their target, especially in a rain strike, these bombs would hit the water and keep going, likely sinking 150(+) feet beneath the sea floor before detonating.
Not saying that this is what's being used, but seeing their burrowing potential, I'd say that these woulda/coulda been used.

CAUTION: (for all you chitlins out there) STRONG LANGUAGE!!!



Now imagine that times eight... or more likely times sixteen.

edit on 20-5-2011 by Mactire because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
63
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join