Yesterday someone posted 2 videos of about 20min worth of footage without revealing what the evidence was, and refused to tell anyone, just trolling
his own thread and repeating "watch the videos before you bring a counter argument". I refused to watch 20min of footage to find out it was
information already covered and or debunked.
Now you want us to go through an 18 page document procured by a website with an obvious agenda to find out if it's been presented, covered, and/or
debunked?
Sigh..... Just because the presentations the birthers present are becoming bigger and more elaborate doesn't make the claims anymore true or false as
they were before.
Before committing to reading an 18 page document, can't you just do people a favor and summarize it so we can decide if it's worth going over?
Especially if it's clearly your agenda to spread the information via posting about it on ATS. You want eyes on it? Summarize it!
EDIT TO ADD: Here is the
link to the thread mentioned above. After 4 pages or
nonsense a mod finally took the time to go over the content, found that it had already been covered on ATS and closed the thread.
I feel very bad for which ever mod has to do the investigative work to find out if this too reaches the same conclusion.
edit on 17-5-2011 by Lighterside because: addendum