It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by uSNUUZuLUUz
Question: Does Robbery equal DEATH?
Does this man deserve to DIE at the hands of a personal firearm? Or does he need punishment, and learn that what he is doing is not right, and he shouldn't do this.
Originally posted by wasco2
reply to post by uSNUUZuLUUz
You obviously don't believe in the concept of self defense. Robbery means taking by force and therefore doing harm to another in the process of taking what is theirs.
You try to rob me and I will shoot you and in Florida I will be within my legal rights.
The victim is not responsible for the robber's family. She is not the one who made poor life choices and put them at risk. Most old people are on fixed incomes and limited means. Is it okay to rob the 80 yo woman and leave her to starve or depend on the charity of others?
You are very naive and have not thought your example through.
The right to defend your life and property goes back to the founding of our country. Though we have strayed from it in some places it still remains one of our basic inalienable rights. Your specific need does not give you the right to take what is theirs from others by force.
Originally posted by SecretGoldfish
reply to post by uSNUUZuLUUz
how does the grandmother know the 20yo's intent though? who gets the benefit of the doubt in a robbery attempt? and you do realize one element of the crime of robbery is use or threat of force?
i see what you're saying but i don't think you can apply that kind of logic to a real time event, particularly to a robbery.
Originally posted by wasco2
reply to post by uSNUUZuLUUz
I get it, you have chosen to be a helpless victim and place all your faith in overworked underpaid authorities. Florida recognizes a right to defend life and property. The Florida law was in response to an epidemic of carjackings and an increasing number of carjackers who would shoot first rather than demand the car. And cool it with the hyperbole, I didn't shoot anyone or even threaten anyone, though that was coming next. He knew what he was doing was wrong and the sight of the gun merely convinced him to stop his criminal action. You may be ok with going to an unknown location with a known criminal against your will but I was not.
Enjoy your victim status but remember the courts have held the police have no duty to defend an individual citizen. Also remember "when seconds count the police are minutes away".
Originally posted by wasco2
reply to post by uSNUUZuLUUz
I''m sorry but you are simply wrong. Yeah some places, even in this country, don't allow you to defend yourself. In my opinion they are wrong too. The definition of robbery includes by force or threat of force. Anytime you use force against another there is a threat of bodily harm or death. If you try to rob me by force in Florida I can shoot you dead on the spot and probably get a "Good job!" from local authorities. Tasers and mace both fail to work and some people. Look at Rodney King still rolling around on the ground and trying to get away even after multiple Taser hits. A gun is the most effective means to stop someone who means to do you bodily harm. If stopping them means killing them then so be it. They gave up the right to protection by the law when they chose to live outside it.
Originally posted by uSNUUZuLUUz
No one is saying that Robbery is ok. She can call the cops during the robbery or after she has been robbed.
Originally posted by uSNUUZuLUUz
Originally posted by wasco2
reply to post by uSNUUZuLUUz
I get it, you have chosen to be a helpless victim and place all your faith in overworked underpaid authorities. Florida recognizes a right to defend life and property. The Florida law was in response to an epidemic of carjackings and an increasing number of carjackers who would shoot first rather than demand the car. And cool it with the hyperbole, I didn't shoot anyone or even threaten anyone, though that was coming next. He knew what he was doing was wrong and the sight of the gun merely convinced him to stop his criminal action. You may be ok with going to an unknown location with a known criminal against your will but I was not.
Enjoy your victim status but remember the courts have held the police have no duty to defend an individual citizen. Also remember "when seconds count the police are minutes away".
It's not about "faith in over-worked authorities". The situation was brought up about a 20 yr old man, and an 80 yr old grandma and "leveling the playing field, buy allowing the grandma to pack heat". Having a gun DOES NOT level the playing field. It makes you into a GOD, with the power to take someone's life. That's the trill right? To be GOD, to have the power to takes someone's life?
Well guess what, you are NOT GOD. You don't have the un-alienable right to kill someone, especially for robbery. Everyone ends up DEAD, when EVERYONE tries to LEVEL the playing field. If everyone thinks like you do, then everyone will have nukes, and every will use nukes because that level's the playing field. Well guess what, you end up with 0 persons alive, thanks to leveling the playing field. Level the playing field means, you eliminate yourself, if everyone thinks like you. Get some brains, please.
Originally posted by wasco2
Originally posted by uSNUUZuLUUz
No one is saying that Robbery is ok. She can call the cops during the robbery or after she has been robbed.
This is just beyond stupid. No, I was going to say something else but there's really no point.
Originally posted by wasco2
reply to post by PapagiorgioCZ
Sorry, "Bowling for Columbine" is utter crap. There are so many outright lies and misrepresentations in it that it can' be considered a documentary. It is a far left anti-gun propaganda piece falsely labelled a "documentary". It has also been thoroughly discredited for anyone that cares to look:
www.hardylaw.net...