It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Intelearthling
Originally posted by InvisibleAlbatross
reply to post by Intelearthling
From the excerpt you posted, it doesn't look like a deal at all, more like a threat. Do we know if this "deal" had a time limit? Was it only after bin Laden left Tora Bora?
From what I gather the article to say is that a deal was made without any time limit. If the United States was to find out that Osama was in Pakistan at any time, we would have the authorization to go into Pakistan and take care of business.
Of course there was the agreement that Pakistan would 'act' like they're upset in the aftermath to appease the Osama supporters.
This news could have a negative affect on the Pakistani government with their own people. This is going to be interesting on how it unfolds.
Originally posted by Wetpaint72
I can't help but wonder...if this is indeed the case, why didn't the Pakistani government just give up his whereabouts?
Originally posted by mudbeed
reply to post by Intelearthling
Yeah but I thought it was common knowledge?
Bush said he got Paki permission back in the day, if anyone else remembers....
ISLAMABAD - Former Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf denied Tuesday that his administration struck an agreement with the United States years ago to let American special forces kill or capture Osama bin Laden inside Pakistan.
The denial follows a report in a British newspaper that Washington and Islamabad reached a secret deal nearly a decade ago allowing the U.S. to conduct operations against bin Laden and two other top al-Qaida leaders on Pakistani soil.
"Pervez Musharraf has seen a media report, and let me make it clear that no such agreement had been signed during his tenure," said Musharraf's spokesman, Fawad Chaudhry. He said there was no oral agreement either.