It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
The US and Pakistan struck a secret deal almost a decade ago permitting a US operation against Osama bin Laden on Pakistani soil similar to last week's raid that killed the al-Qaida leader, the Guardian has learned.
The deal was struck between the military leader General Pervez Musharraf and President George Bush after Bin Laden escaped US forces in the mountains of Tora Bora in late 2001, according to serving and retired Pakistani and US officials.
Under its terms, Pakistan would allow US forces to conduct a unilateral raid inside Pakistan in search of Bin Laden, his deputy, Ayman al-Z
Afterwards, both sides agreed, Pakistan would vociferously protest the incursion.
Originally posted by thorazineshuffle
This probably belongs in skunkworks.
The former US official said the Pakistani protests of the past week were the "public face" of the deal. "We knew they would deny this stuff."
The former US official said that impetus for the co-operation, much like the Bin Laden deal, was driven by the US. "It didn't come from Musharraf's desire. On the Predators, we made it very clear to them that if they weren't going to prosecute these targets, we were, and there was nothing they could do to stop us taking unilateral action.
"We told them, over and again: 'We'll stop the Predators if you take these targets out yourselves.'
No, if it was true, then why was Pakistan upset that the US raided Bin Ladens compound?
Originally posted by thorazineshuffle
No, if it was true, then why was Pakistan upset that the US raided Bin Ladens compound?
...Afterwards, both sides agreed, Pakistan would vociferously protest the incursion.
Originally posted by thorazineshuffle
No, if it was true, then why was Pakistan upset that the US raided Bin Ladens compound?
Under its terms, Pakistan would allow US forces to conduct a unilateral raid inside Pakistan in search of Bin Laden, his deputy, Ayman al-Zawahiri, and the al-Qaida No3. Afterwards, both sides agreed, Pakistan would vociferously protest the incursion.
[/quote
It helps if you read the article.
The former US official said the Pakistani protests of the past week were the "public face" of the deal. "We knew they would deny this stuff."
If in fact this former "US official" is credible, the existance of an existing agreement would explain a lot. I'd love to know who the former US official is.edit on 9-5-2011 by robyn because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by thorazineshuffle
No, if it was true, then why was Pakistan upset that the US raided Bin Ladens compound?
Originally posted by InvisibleAlbatross
reply to post by Intelearthling
From the excerpt you posted, it doesn't look like a deal at all, more like a threat. Do we know if this "deal" had a time limit? Was it only after bin Laden left Tora Bora?