It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by beezzerI
Corruption runs rampant in DC.
*I'm disgusted*
Originally posted by WingedBull
Originally posted by beezzerI
Corruption runs rampant in DC.
*I'm disgusted*
How is this corruption?
Originally posted by beezzer
At a guess, I'd say the deliberate erosion of the "separation of powers".
Originally posted by LosLobos
Originally posted by beezzer
At a guess, I'd say the deliberate erosion of the "separation of powers".
Funny, Obama has increased the number of political appointees by a meer 12% or so over Bush. Bush increased them by 312% or so over Clinton. I guess the same can be said about our debt also.
Tell me, who is more guilty of a deliberate erosion of the separation of powers?
Why do you guys keep giving Dick and Bush a pass on everything? But if this administration does anything remotely like Dick and Bush then its an erosion of the separation of powers?
...by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint...all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.
may delegate, and authorize successive redelegations of,
to an officer or employee of the Administration any function,
power, or duty conferred upon the Administrator, unless such
delegation is prohibited by law;
Originally posted by ownbestenemy
reply to post by watcher3339
I am curious as to your position in regards to this proposed bill? Do you see it as dangerous? If so, how? Do you think this bill is circumventing Article II, Section 2 of the United States Constitution which is where the "...with advice and consent"? Are you aware that by law, Congress can delegate (notice, not just the Senate) such appointments to other various persons such as the President alone, Courts of Law and Department Heads?
After reading my post just above yours, are those feelings still the same knowing this isn't anything dangerous and the bill itself is actually very focused and names the offices in which they are going to amend the USC?
So you want to just forward fear to representatives without actually having any knowledge or bother to learn more about the bill? You just like the title and based your whole post on it. ATS at its finest.
Originally posted by beezzer
At a guess, I'd say the deliberate erosion of the "separation of powers".
Originally posted by AnteBellum
Maybe he will be able to appoint positions within our government but an Emperor like Caesar is stretching it a bit.
Still interesting to see how this will be abused.
Originally posted by watcher3339
ATS at it's finest! Aw shucks, thanks. Oh, wait I see you were being sarcastic???
Actually it isn't just that I liked the title. It is that there is very real potential for abuse here. Oh, an unknown person on a conspiracy website has told me not to worry? Great! No problem then, is American Idol on tonight?
Congress gave the okay to the Federal Reserve too, a bunch of us are uncomfortable with that one too.
...but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.
So, what, you suggest that I not contact my representative. I should just hush up now? If my representative has a good reason for wanting to support the bill, then HE can feel free to express it to me. That's how it works. We elect them and then they are supposed to educate themselves on important issues and we get to share our opinions with them and ask questions. If we don't like the way that they vote. We don't have to vote them back into office. So why would you feel it so necessary to try to make people feel like they shouldn't get to contact their representatives? Do you have some kind of vested interest in Sheeple?
Originally posted by WingedBull
Originally posted by beezzer
At a guess, I'd say the deliberate erosion of the "separation of powers".
Except that it isn't and it explicitly allowed for in the Constitution.