posted on May, 5 2011 @ 05:53 PM
Originally posted by here4awhile
I don't get it...not a single one of these guys looked like they were armed...they almost look caught off guard...there's even a squirt gun next to
the one...this looks like cold blooded killing
Maybe, maybe not. I tend to agree the killings weren't justified by arms (I don't tend to believe they were armed much at all, at least Bin Laden),
but I'm not going to lie and say I can tell from the pictures that were shot at least an hour after the SEALS team left and at close range (hence
weapons might be elsewhere).
Originally posted by michaelmcclen
If they said he had no internet then why do i see a vga cable in the backround? Laptops are pointless with no internet also they say Osama dident
The really big question is if there is a VGA cable there will be a laptop or computer, wonder what on the harddrives?
Umm...a VGA cable is for connecting computer monitors to the PC. You have absolutely no clue about anything regarding computers to make such a
Laptops are not pointless with no Internet. Also network and network cables do not require Internet access surprisingly.
The fact that I have to explain this to you is proof enough that at a minimum you are plain wrong...
Originally posted by stealthyone
Firefight - no
Asassination - yes
Look at the photos, where is there any body damage? They are all headshots. Some look to even be from behind as there is no damage to to face or side
of the head visible.
There was no firefight, none at all. If they were resisting, there would not be all headshots in my opinion.
I and others see marks indicative of possible entry wounds. Highly likely they were shot facing the SEALS teams as their positions and the blood pools
seem to indicate large exit wounds from the back of the head/neck in addition to body shots.
Entry wounds are typically a lot smaller than exit wounds. If they were shot in the back of the head they would most likely be lying on their faces or
sides and have very nasty open facial wounds. Also how easy is it to sneak up and shoot four people in the back of the head without any of them
turning to face you. I tend to believe they were shot in the front or side and the evidence seems to confirm that. It's possible of course they were
shot multiple times (likely actually) so a wound to the back of the head might be possible as well.
I agree, there probably wasn't much of a firefight, but I'd hardly call it an assassination. More like taking all precautions and just shooting them
as they scrambled to either run away or get weapons. Keep in mind how tense of a scene that must have been in the dead of night.
Originally posted by monkofmimir
This kind of begs the question, what happened.
As I underrstand it, they stormed the place and killed everyone inside, then they took only one(some?) of the bodies for a sea burial but left the
rest behind. then announced they'd killed osama.
Every honest senario I can play out in my mind as to why they would take osama's body to despose but not these mens fails.
either the men incharge of this operation were bizarly and illogically moronic or this is a conspiracy.
You have a very limited imagination. But that's kind of typical...
It's unfathomable to you that the U.S.A. would ONLY take the body of the most wanted man in the world and not the three other nobodies in a
helicopter that has a weight capacity given one helicopter already failed?