It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Akragon
reply to post by Buddha1098
i understand that... I've had experiences myself, but i wouldn't place them in the delusional catagory. If you know the truth of existance why dilute it by presenting the possibility of insanity.
Perhaps its fear of being wrong?
Originally posted by Shamatt
Originally posted by NadaCambia
Originally posted by Shamatt
Originally posted by madnessinmysoul
reply to post by Shamatt
Agnostic Atheist
Gnostic Atheist
I thought that one was already sorted out. Agnostic is a position on whether or not the question is absolutely knowable, not whether or not you believe. Both people described are atheists as they both lack a belief in any deity.
Fair enough. Millions of us will continue to use the words incorrectly.
You, in your wosdom and brilliance can start being the onlu person in the world to use the words the way you are proposing. Have fun.
Jeeez, how can someone be so thick sculled and arrogent? Must be a teeneager
In the UK what he's saying is both the accepted definition and understanding of Atheism and Agnosticism. He's hardly unique in his views. In fact most theologians and noted Atheists agree too.
I spent most of my life in the UK I was born there. What he is saying is a crock. He keeps saying "How often do I have to explain this" - Well, Untill he gets it right he will have a lot of explaining to do matey!
So many intelligent people have tried to put him rught here, but he stil sticks with his stupid duality.
All Oranges are fruit, therfore all fruit is oranges.
Athiests don't beleive in a god so if you don't beleive in a god your are an athiest.
This is flawed logic as it assumes that those who have not yet made up their minds must, by definition not yet beleive in god and therfore they must be by definition an Athiest. Doh!
And if you start getting to the nitty gritty, Athiests beleive there is no god, agnostics can't decide, just don;t know..... then all sorts of non logical mumbo jumbo gets thrown about which really makes little sence at all.
This guy is a brilliant arguer, if only he could get his poor little head arround some basic English words. Perhaps purchase a dictionary, or check out some online recourses wchich would help him look up the meaning or words.
Originally posted by awake_and_aware
reply to post by Buddha1098
I don't like seing myself post, but i do like seing ignorance put right, even my own.
And of course i exist. Agnostic to my existence? i should think words being typed into a forum, with a user name, suggests some kind of sentient existence....
I'm an existentialist. Like i said, you've admitted your own agnosticism regarding the causality of existence, or whether causation is even a nessasary assumption.
Your argument rests on your experience, which you are yet to detail, and quick to defend.
edit on 3/5/11 by awake_and_aware because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Buddha1098
reply to post by madnessinmysoul
I'm agnostic so my answer would be: "Maybe."
In my opinion experience is the only thing to base reality on.
Originally posted by madnessinmysoul
The two aren't mutually exclusive terms. 'Agnostic' used on its own is an incomplete statement. You cannot be a simple agnostic as there is a position of either belief or not in a deity no matter what.
Types of Agnosticism
Agnostic atheism
Agnostic theism
Apathetic or Pragmatic agnosticism
Ignosticism
Strong agnosticism (also called "hard," "closed," "strict," or "permanent agnosticism"
Weak agnosticism (also called "soft," "open," "empirical," or "temporal agnosticism")