It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

100% PROOF! Obama "RESOLVES" That He Is Not Eligible To Be President! (Condemning Info!)

page: 2
75
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 29 2011 @ 06:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by Hendrix92TheUniverse
You might be a fool, if you don't read the Constitution. which clearly states that both parents must be U.S. citizens.

The birth certificate issue was just a ruse to get us to believe that Obama was legitimate.


Really?

You are gonna need to prove that one to me.




posted on Apr, 29 2011 @ 06:42 PM
link   
reply to post by Hendrix92TheUniverse
 


The more the birthers complain about Obama's birth certificate...the more I feel compelled to vote for him. I don't know if that makes much sense, but if the birthers are going to determine who our next president will be...then perhaps Obama can't be so bad.



posted on Apr, 29 2011 @ 06:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by civilchallenger
reply to post by Hendrix92TheUniverse
 


The video very obviously proves nothing, since it offers no reason for me to believe the citizenship of Obama's parents at the time of his birth were anything but US citizenship. So, when did Obama's dad become a citizen?



Thank you, you nailed it !

Obama's dad was a kenyan, and at the time a British Protectorate, therefore, Obama's dad was british, therefore, Obama is ineligible to be the president of the U.S.

Thanks for posting.



posted on Apr, 29 2011 @ 06:45 PM
link   
unfortunatly s.res 511 is nonbind which means it does not have the force of law..
answers.yahoo.com...




S. Res. 511 was a resolution (resolutions differ from bills in that they are non-binding, that is, they do not go to the House to vote on or the President to sign, and therefore they do not have the force of law


what they, the writters agreed upon was a definition of 'natural born citizen'..and that was ..one had to be born on u.s. soil and that both parents had to be citizens of the u.s.

and obama was one of the writters.. his hypocricy knows no bounds..wow..just wow


"all hope is gone"



posted on Apr, 29 2011 @ 06:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by Hendrix92TheUniverse

Originally posted by civilchallenger
reply to post by Hendrix92TheUniverse
 


The video very obviously proves nothing, since it offers no reason for me to believe the citizenship of Obama's parents at the time of his birth were anything but US citizenship. So, when did Obama's dad become a citizen?



Thank you, you nailed it !

Obama's dad was a kenyan, and at the time a British Protectorate, therefore, Obama's dad was british, therefore, Obama is ineligible to be the president of the U.S.

Thanks for posting.


Several presidents have one parent born on foreign soil and at least one - both parents were born on foreign soil.

The only requirement is Obama is born on US soil.
edit on 29-4-2011 by Annee because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 29 2011 @ 06:52 PM
link   

Originally posted by jude11
Where will the fake BC get to? Nowhere. Give it up and concentrate on what is possible.

Either demand his resignation or failing that, DON'T vote him in again!

That's how to get rid of him.

IMO


Here's the issue... If this man is not eligible to be president, every signature he signed in that capacity is now null and void. So are his orders to attack Libya. It makes a difference.

And this vid shows that by resolution (ironically that he himself signed) he isn't president.



posted on Apr, 29 2011 @ 06:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by Amaterasu
And this vid shows that by resolution (ironically that he himself signed) he isn't president.


We are definitely on opposite sides on this one. But that's OK.

What resolution?



posted on Apr, 29 2011 @ 06:57 PM
link   
In my time here I've learned that thread titles that contain absolutes ( ALWAYS, NEVER 100% etc) are usually wrong. :shk:

The fatal flaw of the "well made" video is that the resolution was non binding.

Which part of the word WRONG do Birthers not understand?
edit on 29-4-2011 by kinda kurious because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 29 2011 @ 07:00 PM
link   
reply to post by Annee
 


....see my post 2 above yours.....
2nd line....



posted on Apr, 29 2011 @ 07:00 PM
link   

Originally posted by Annee

Originally posted by Hendrix92TheUniverse
You might be a fool, if you don't read the Constitution. which clearly states that both parents must be U.S. citizens.

The birth certificate issue was just a ruse to get us to believe that Obama was legitimate.


Really?

You are gonna need to prove that one to me.


Watch the damn video, Obama himself agreed that both parents must be U.S. citizens.

How can you make such a statement without reviewing the evidence?

I question the loyalty to America of some of the respondents.



posted on Apr, 29 2011 @ 07:06 PM
link   
I have to take kid to park now.

Something doesn't make sense. Why would someone who has a parent born outside the US do this?



posted on Apr, 29 2011 @ 07:07 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Apr, 29 2011 @ 07:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by Annee

But wasn't the law (or whatever) stating if you are born in a US territory or military base (Panama) outside the US - enacted after John McCain was born - - and nothing stating retro-active?



I THINK you are referring to this,

www.snopes.com...


Which does help explain why McCain had to have a hearing. The video was trying to claim because John McCain had to satisfy TWO questions to determine if he was a natural born citizen, that Obama did too. Those hearings were about John McCains citizenship status ONLY. (He says this at 18 secs in)

At 53 secs, he says the two questions the Senate had to answer were,

"Where was John McCain born and could it be considered American soil? and number two, were BOTH of his parents American citizens."

These questions pertain to John McCain, because of where he was born. IF the answer to question one was "yes, it could have been considered US soil," they might not have even moved to question two. Because the answer to question one was "no" they had to look to question two.

Notice that its about John McCain, not all Americans. Not Obama. McCain, because he was not born in the US, and he was born before the law that automatically made children born there citizens.

Obama is not in those circumstances. He satisfies question one. IF he were born in Kenya, he would not be ok. Which is why the birthers tried to make him born there first. And why they have been focusing on his long form the whole time. Now they have his long form, they are grabbing at very stupid straws. Let me repeat that, very stupid straws. Not only is this not a smoking gun, its stupid.

Both Obamas parents dont need to be natural born citizens.. Because HE is by virtue of being born on US soil.

The guy is a con artist. He is trying to take McCains really tricky situation and apply it to Obamas very simple one.



posted on Apr, 29 2011 @ 07:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by jam321
Correct me if I am wrong.

But wasn't senate resolution 511 NONBINDING?

That means Congress never passed a law defining what a natural born American is.

Looks like 100% is headed toward 0% proof.


en.wikipedia.org...


Wait actually you're right I missed your post. Bill IS nonbinding, meaning it was never passed as a law. Nevermind people move along nothing to see here unfortunately.
edit on 29-4-2011 by ericsnow because: (no reason given)

edit on 29-4-2011 by ericsnow because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 29 2011 @ 07:13 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Apr, 29 2011 @ 07:13 PM
link   

Originally posted by Hendrix92TheUniverse


Watch the damn video, Obama himself agreed that both parents must be U.S. citizens.



YOU watch the damn video. Obama himself agreed that both McCains parents must be US citizens because he was born in Panama.

The whole resolution is about McCain and his specific situation. Not all Americans. And certainly not those born on US soil.
edit on 29-4-2011 by Illusionsaregrander because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 29 2011 @ 07:15 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Apr, 29 2011 @ 07:16 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Apr, 29 2011 @ 07:23 PM
link   
Senate Resolutions are not binding. However, should McCain have been elected and the Democratic birthers would have challenged his electon, the Senate was the location where impeachement proceedings would have to take place. The Senate made a pre-emptive statement that there would be no impeachment on the birther issue.



posted on Apr, 29 2011 @ 07:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by Annee

Originally posted by Amaterasu
And this vid shows that by resolution (ironically that he himself signed) he isn't president.


We are definitely on opposite sides on this one. But that's OK.

What resolution?


The resolution that defined "natural born" to mean of parents, both of whom are citizens, relative to McCain (again, ironically). He does not qualify, based on the BC We have been given. Period. Is there a point that We stop accepting twisting everything to support someone who does the opposite of campaign promises? Like the whole "transparency" thing is a minor detail?

Geez. I love You dearly, Annee. You're right, though. We seem to be divergent on this score. And You're right. [smile] It's OK.



new topics

top topics



 
75
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join