It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Vitchilo
I support gay rights all the way, but . . . .
Originally posted by Annee
There are plenty of adults from past generations that can't balance their check books. Your point?
It is not gay history. It is history recognizing the contribution of homosexuals and lesbians.
Originally posted by jannypan
I have no problems with anyone's sexual orientation (short of pedophiles) but this is a bit ridiculous. I think kids need more time running laps and playing sports than learning gay history.
Originally posted by ViperChili
The sexual orientation of great contributors to society means absolutely nothing, whether they are straight or gay.
Get over it and stop looking for affirmation of your sexuality.
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by ViperChili
The sexual orientation of great contributors to society means absolutely nothing, whether they are straight or gay.
Get over it and stop looking for affirmation of your sexuality.
That's because its automatically assumed everyone is straight.
Such the case that it isn't an issue.
Originally posted by ViperChili
Originally posted by Annee
There are plenty of adults from past generations that can't balance their check books. Your point?
It is not gay history. It is history recognizing the contribution of homosexuals and lesbians.
The sexual orientation of great contributors to society means absolutely nothing, whether they are straight or gay.
Get over it and stop looking for affirmation of your sexuality.
Originally posted by TheKnave
If things were all fair and great that ya I would agree with you. This kind of class would just be a first step into making society comfterable with homosexuality which it is not right now. Can no one place them selves in anothers shoes and imagine how crappy it would feel to be irrationally hated by millions of people?
Originally posted by ViperChili
Does the fact that someone who may have contributed something great to the planet liked to wear a hot pink thong and a bra change their contribution? Absolutely not.
Is additional education needed to point out the great crossdressers over the years in order to make current crossdressers feel better? Hell no.
Admittedly, I think the crossdressers are a little nutty, and no amount of "crossdresser history" classes would change an opinion.
Is additional education needed to point out the great crossdressers over the years in order to make current crossdressers feel better? Hell no.
Originally posted by neo96
no people do not fight for equality everyday
why else would we continually keep straping labels on ourselves such as
left,right,straight.gay,lesbian,white,black, etc and of course the hypenated american names.
every thing we do is to set ourselves apart from everyone else implying that just be an american is not good enough.
if people wanted true equality then drop the labels
Originally posted by neo96
if people wanted true equality then drop the labels
Originally posted by ViperChili
reply to post by Annee
Lets void forced "tolerance" as well.
No, you got it wrong. Gay history is AS IMPORTANT. Thus why the inclusion.
Originally posted by ViperChili
Gays, lesbians, bisexuals and transgender people would be added to the lengthy list of social and ethnic groups that public schools must include in social studies lessons under a landmark bill passed Thursday by the California Senate.
If the bill is adopted by the state Assembly and signed by Gov. Jerry Brown, California would become the first state to require the teaching of gay history. Supporters say the move is needed to counter anti-gay stereotypes and beliefs that make children in those groups vulnerable to bullying and suicide.
Opponents counter that such instruction would further burden an already crowded curriculum and expose students to a subject that some parents find objectionable. The legislation, sponsored by Democratic Sen. Mark Leno of San Francisco, passed on a 23-14 party line vote. It also would add disabled people to the curriculum.
Entire article
Lol, the nutjobs in CA never cease to amaze me.
How about spending more time on important subjects like math or science?
No, instead, gay history is more important.
One of our FBI Directors was a notorious cross dresser, maybe you heard of him in your History class decades ago, J Edgar Hoover? So, cross dressers are ALREADY being discussed.
Originally posted by ViperChili
reply to post by Annee
Try reading comprehension 101 at your local community college.
My comment clearly referred to crossdressers, which should have been obvious, since I said this:
Admittedly, I think the crossdressers are a little nutty, and no amount of "crossdresser history" classes would change an opinion.
and
Is additional education needed to point out the great crossdressers over the years in order to make current crossdressers feel better? Hell no.
Comprehending what you read is crucial to debate.
edit on 18-4-2011 by ViperChili because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ViperChili
reply to post by Annee
So you support violating on persons rights in order to make someone else feel good about themselves.