Anti Gravity Acheived And Confirmed

page: 3
12
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join

posted on May, 7 2011 @ 12:01 AM
link   

Originally posted by fizzy1
What the hell are all the lightbulbs for.
ROFLMAO


Light bulbs wouldn't have been there, if they were not a part of the project. Thats pretty obvious, isnt it.
The project now stands concluded.




posted on May, 7 2011 @ 12:05 AM
link   

Originally posted by cloaked4u
Your being followed dude. Mi6 is the guy in the blue demim. Get out of there, now. The bathroom in the back has a big enough window to crawl thru, go there now. You have been found out, they comming to get the info. DUDE, hide the tomatoes with mercury. CONTROL # ioweyou4nothingtosee.


Lol , not to worry, I'm incahoots with the mi6



posted on May, 7 2011 @ 12:08 AM
link   
Okay....so its not only a source of energy but a time machine?

Caution:Since this is also concurrently a Time Machine & out of safety and securityconcerns together with patent and copyright issues, pl do not attempt to reverseengineer this project technology.

And what are the light bulbs for in that photo?


edit on 7-5-2011 by topherman420 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 7 2011 @ 12:13 AM
link   
so you got paid for your invention?
i read the report and correct if im wrong but it doesnt say you actually made the,tomato? float, just reduced 500 grams weight?
and your machine is powered by zero point energy? impressive if true
but what is it? the picture of your 'device' looks like a rusty piece of metal
please correct my mistakes
but why can you not tell us more about the machine or your tests?



posted on May, 7 2011 @ 01:52 AM
link   
RE PMH and Tophenrman.
You ormi6 Lol), would do better to consult a physicist of the calibre of stephen hawking who could tell you within an hour or less that the report and the results ( or claims as many atsers would call it) are all auhentic andwell founded



posted on May, 7 2011 @ 02:07 AM
link   
reply to post by Angelic Resurrection
 


Sorry Stephen Hawkings ALS has progressed pretty bad over the years. His assistant would take way more then an hour to relay it from him and produce the equations that show that.



posted on May, 7 2011 @ 02:33 AM
link   
so you should tell us whats so well researched and founded



posted on May, 7 2011 @ 02:50 AM
link   

Originally posted by P-M-H
so you should tell us whats so well researched and founded


I'm afraid the op does say the intended purpose of this thread, or did you miss that.



posted on May, 7 2011 @ 03:50 AM
link   
reply to post by Angelic Resurrection
 


From the Hitavada article about the 'fixed rotor motionless electric power generator':


This prototype machine guzzles 230-250 volts of power and generates over 600 volts


Assuming those were your actual words, there's either a poor piece of journalism OR you're not at all qualified or experienced in the field of electrical engineering. You may wonder why I conclude that and the reason is that it's a very poorly worded description of an ordinary step-up transformer and there's nothing at all sensational about that unless we go back to the 19th century.

I'm not being nasty but, if you're convinced there's something new & worthy of study in this project, perhaps enlisting the aid of an experienced person with the appropriate knowledge and understanding to document it would be a good first step to take.



posted on May, 7 2011 @ 04:09 AM
link   

www.youtube.com...
if the vid doesnt work: link ^
edit on 5/7/2011 by ashtonkusher because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 7 2011 @ 04:23 AM
link   

Originally posted by Pilgrum
Assuming those were your actual words, there's either a poor piece of journalism OR you're not at all qualified or experienced in the field of electrical engineering. You may wonder why I conclude that and the reason is that it's a very poorly worded description of an ordinary step-up transformer and there's nothing at all sensational about that unless we go back to the 19th century.

I'm not being nasty but, if you're convinced there's something new & worthy of study in this project, perhaps enlisting the aid of an experienced person with the appropriate knowledge and understanding to document it would be a good first step to take.


The newspaper reporter was not exactly an engineer or a secientific person.
Besides dont need an aid or any1 as an am an marine engineer myself and have concluded my research
as the AG paper states



posted on May, 7 2011 @ 05:42 AM
link   
reply to post by Angelic Resurrection
 


Oh you were not assasinated yet? Then its probably not working..



posted on May, 7 2011 @ 06:40 AM
link   
Things that have not been achieved:

1) Anti-gravity
2) Confirmation of the above

Why is this thread in Science & Technology, again?



posted on May, 7 2011 @ 09:33 AM
link   

Originally posted by Maslo
reply to post by Angelic Resurrection
 


Oh you were not assasinated yet? Then its probably not working..


Oh its working alright although not yet brought to the market.........Scaaarrryyyy
Get the gist



posted on May, 7 2011 @ 11:21 AM
link   
Sorry Guys,May day fools. It's 1st of may



posted on May, 7 2011 @ 01:57 PM
link   

Originally posted by john_bmth
Things that have not been achieved:

1) Anti-gravity
2) Confirmation of the above

Why is this thread in Science & Technology, again?


Is there any reason to believe so given the fact that you seem to be so
sure of what you are saying.



posted on May, 7 2011 @ 02:41 PM
link   
reply to post by Angelic Resurrection
 


First of all this post is a load of crap and should be removed. You either need to publish the science or technology behind your so calaled test or not even say anything tell a patent is approved. Second of all if your just some dam crackpot you need to stfu and stop posting crap you know isnt true because you give a bad name to true indipendent inventer's everywhere making it imposible for people with something real to get public acceptance.



posted on May, 7 2011 @ 10:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by redrose123
reply to post by Angelic Resurrection
 


First of all this post is a load of crap and should be removed. You either need to publish the science or technology behind your so calaled test or not even say anything tell a patent is approved. Second of all if your just some dam crackpot you need to stfu and stop posting crap you know isnt true because you give a bad name to true indipendent inventer's everywhere making it imposible for people with something real to get public acceptance.


Surprising ranting there. Consult a physicist for starters.
Also come clean on your allegations or stfu and besides you are
hardly in a position to tell me what i should do.
Take your rants to some other forum instead of polluting here.



posted on May, 8 2011 @ 07:29 AM
link   

Originally posted by Angelic Resurrection

Originally posted by john_bmth
Things that have not been achieved:

1) Anti-gravity
2) Confirmation of the above

Why is this thread in Science & Technology, again?


Is there any reason to believe so given the fact that you seem to be so
sure of what you are saying.


You have provided absolutely no evidence of any of the above, or your "time machine". This type of junk does not believe in the S&T forum.
edit on 8-5-2011 by john_bmth because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 8 2011 @ 11:11 AM
link   

Originally posted by john_bmth
[ You have provided absolutely no evidence of any of the above, or your "time machine". This type of junk does not believe in the S&T forum.
edit on 8-5-2011 by john_bmth because: (no reason given)


On the contrary all the evidence is there on the link and in this thread.
Get help from a scientific person, if you are not able to interpret the results





top topics
 
12
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join