It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Angelic Resurrection
Originally posted by john_bmth
[ You have provided absolutely no evidence of any of the above, or your "time machine". This type of junk does not believe in the S&T forum.edit on 8-5-2011 by john_bmth because: (no reason given)
On the contrary all the evidence is there on the link and in this thread.
Get help from a scientific person, if you are not able to interpret the results
Originally posted by john_bmth
You call that results? An Excel chart and some pictures? Get help from a science person. Preferably a psychologist.
Originally posted by john_bmth
reply to post by Angelic Resurrection
You haven't provided any proof whatsoever You claim to have invented anti-gravity and a time machine. Not only are your claims absolutely ridiculous but some Excel graph and a few pictures does not even begin to cut the mustard.If you actually believe your delusional claims then you need psychological help.
Originally posted by mrwiffler
Uh oh. It's savvy84 or whatever his name was.(check his link) Get ready for a roller-coaster ride of astonishing lack of information, revealed by numerous requests for, "just the slightest iota of detail please" followed by savvy's complete refusal to oblige, which then will degenerate into a back and forth taunting festival...ending in a thread close and thorough banning by incredulous mods.
Originally posted by fizzy1
Good luck my friend with your wild claims.
Originally posted by Angelic Resurrection
Originally posted by fizzy1
Good luck my friend with your wild claims.
You could at least read the thread and links b4 posting.
All the proof is there for an educated person in math and physics
Although caution wikipedia will be no help on this
Originally posted by Angelic Resurrection
Originally posted by fizzy1
Good luck my friend with your wild claims.
You could at least read the thread and links b4 posting.
All the proof is there for an educated person in math and physics
Although caution wikipedia will be no help on this
Originally posted by fizzy1
Saavys i read all the posts in this thread before i posted. ALL OF THEM. last time you got blow apart because you didnt know the difference between mass and weight. You were a joke then and your a joke now. I sure wish KJgunderson would drop by this forum. last time we had some real fun with you before the mods removed the thread.
Originally posted by topherman420
Please, go bring it to the mathematicians, engineers, physicists and potential investors. Then if they think your device is indeed a time machine/anti gravity machine, they can right an intelligible paper that people can actually interpret. None of us here are in that field (though i wish one would drop by) and it is not our job to make your work at least somewhat coherent.
Originally posted by fizzy1
reply to post by Angelic Resurrection
So what do you mean by you see i am from houston. I doubt you have ever even left the country you are in. What the heck does where i am from have anything to do with your paper. Dude i just posted links to threads you have been on where even the scientific people dont know what the hell you are talking about and know your an idiot. Do you just make up stuff like this to make yourself feel smart? What is the purpose of this? Your claims are ridiculous. They were over a year ago and still are. You provide NO proff whatsoever. If i had anything near what you claim to have inventedi would not be still over a year later claiming i was filing a patent for it then saying i will release all the tech physics behind what i invented after the patent. Its ridiculous. I would be showing it to the world and not on some conspiracy website. Your a joke brah!
There's nothing to interpret, it's all gibberish. Trust me, you do not need any academic training roses that his "paper" is absolute nonsense.
Originally posted by Bixxi3
So can anyone who understands this type of stuff(I don't have a clue but am interested) look through his work and patent request and what not. Obviously he thinks he is on to something to not give up after all these years (the post on the elc forum is 2009) and as far as i can see he isn't just trying to0 sell a book. i dunno i guess i find that refreshing. i hope someone who knows his stuff has look through all his docs. and if its not there then tell him with out turning to personal insults.edit on 8-5-2011 by Bixxi3 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by mrwiffler
Savvy, could you please supply the name of the lab that performed the tests on the mercury and strontium? And do you have the results from the lab in their original form?edit on 9-5-2011 by mrwiffler because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Angelic Resurrection
This is a load of sheites, you have posted there.
Never mind, its not your fault as I can see that English is not your first language
and imo you seem to be a spam bot. Not a real person and this is the joke of the century.
Anyway my project is concluded and all the proof is there who can understand physics.
Originally posted by James1982
But if he is willfully trying to "Pull one over" on us, then he should be quite ashamed.