reply to post by MathiasAndrew
You seem to post things that you don't fully read......and you tend to, maybe, base your "opinion" on them solely on the titles?
That interesting document (study, invention...proposal) has nothing to do with "chemtrails" ... well, of course, since there are no such things,
The inventive idea of the "nanoparticles" is to increase combustion efficiency!
. This means that those same particles will ALSO be
burned up, reduced to constituent gasses, etc. I daresay, also.....that any amounts, in a percentage by weight, of "nanoparticles" will be
IF you would just stop and think logically, for a few minutes....you would see this entire ghost-chasing exercise of something "in the fuel" to
"cause" the non-existent "chem"-trails is utter nonsense.
something, some component, was added that made the engine exhaust more visible, for whatever reason.....it would always be
From the beginning of start-up, taxi out, and take off and climb.
But...WE DON'T SEE THIS! (Do we??)
No....what we see are CONTRAILS. Easily explainable, predictable......based on science and atmospheric readings and conditions.
In any case.....surely you've been reading the other threads?? Why hasn't it sunk in, yet, that the many proposals out there intended to be
suggestions that will mitigate the "Global Warming" (still unsure about that, aren't we? There is no firm consensus either way as to whether that
is even occurring at all...).....it should have sunk in, from reading, that any technology used to deflect the UV or Infrared radiation will have the
opposite visual effects than what the "chemmies" are "complaining" about!
BLUER, deeper blue skies...CLEAR skies, for example. The CONtrails are visible because they are clouds. Clouds are visible, too. These exotic
atmospheric ideas would be mostly INVISIBLE to the human visual spectrum!!
Think of glass.....I know, different material....but, DID YOU KNOW that glass will deflect some UV radiation? And, glass is clear, of course
(usually....in purest forms).
Of course, glass in particular, has a tendency to trap IR radiation (thus, greenhouses) ..... but, it was just an example of something that is
"invisible" (transparent) yet still effective in ways that are counter-intuitive.
(Until you get a proper science education, that is....)