It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by FoxStriker
A bank that's corrupt and has committed fraud... I would think its common place, I guess until the common man can afford lobbyiest and assasins, I don't think such things will change.
Commander X has stated that anon is CIA.
But if you read some of the 40,000+ emails that were stolen from HBGary Federal by Anonymous and posted on Pirate Bay, you might think otherwise.
It seems Aaron Barr -- the CEO of HBGary Federal who thought he’d make a big splash by outing the leadership of Anonymous and instead ended up getting ridden hard and put away wet by the very hackers he sought to expose -- decided de Vries is in fact the mysterious Commander X, alleged puppetmaster of the Anonymous collective. So he said as much in some of the thousands of private email conversations the Anons just shared with the world.
4chan is also funded through CIA (anon hangs out there)
4chan is also a CIA Server
And the link in my sig, it connects wikileaks
to Soros and the CIA through NED Grants.
So Anon and wikileaks both have the same boss
and the same funding.
And they both are exposing the same people
Assange threatened this bank
dump 3 months ago and then anon follows up
with the actual dump.
maybe u need to catch up on some reading
Originally posted by boondock-saint
reply to post by mr-lizard
I'm not here to argue.
u believe whatever you want to believe
as I can see you took the blue pill.
Originally posted by RustyShakleford92
So, Bank of America is being exposed by a Wikileaks support group called Anonymous.
In China, Wikileaks is suspected of having Mossad connections. It is pointed out that its first “leak” was from an Al Shabbab “insider” in Somalia. Al Shabbab is the Muslim insurgent group that the neocons have linked to “Al Qaeda.”
WMR has learned from Asian intelligence sources that there is a strong belief in some Asian countries, particularly China and Thailand, that the website Wikileaks, which purports to publish classified and sensitive documents while guaranteeing anonymity to the providers, is linked to U.S. cyber-warfare and computer espionage operations, as well as to Mossad’s own cyber-warfare activities.
Pentagon Source Says China Hacked Defense Department Computers
China denies hacking into Pentagon computers
Our Asian intelligence sources report the following: “Wikileaks is running a disinformation campaign, crying persecution by U.S. intelligence- when it is U.S. intelligence itself. Its [Wikileaks'] activities in Iceland are totally suspect.” Wikileaks claims it is the victim of a new COINTELPRO [Counter Intelligence Program] operation directed by the Pentagon and various U.S. intelligence agencies. WMR’s sources believe that it is Wikileaks that is part and parcel of a cyber-COINTELPRO campaign, such as that proposed by President Obama’s “information czar,” Dr. Cass Sunstein.
WMR has confirmed Young’s contention that Wikileaks is a CIA front operation. Wikileaks is intimately involved in a $20 million CIA operation that U.S.-based Chinese dissidents that hack into computers in China. Some of the Chinese hackers route special hacking program through Chinese computers that then target U.S. government and military computer systems. After this hacking is accomplished, the U.S. government announces through friendly media outlets that U.S. computers have been subjected to a Chinese cyber-attack. The “threat” increases an already-bloated cyber-defense and offense budget and plays into the fears of the American public and businesses that heavily rely on information technology.
By putting Wikileaks Mossad in the search field on Google.com, the first hit on 18 February 2011 was for a blog on The Telegraph in England. The title of the entry read Is Wikileaks a Front for the CIA or Mossad? The reason the blogger asked the question was because the blog's writer had just heard an unnamed Iranian analyst during an undisclosed interview on Al Jazeera say that Wikileaks had to be a front for these organizations given the nature of the diplomatic cables which discredit "the region’s leaders and Iran in particular."
And if you read the blog entry you'll find that the blogger never goes on to directly accuse Wikileaks of Mossad connections, but the perception constructed through an evocative title remains a top hit on the number one search engine.
Next on the list of results was the Pakistan Daily. It claimed that according to unidentified Asian intelligence sources "there is a strong belief in some Asian countries, particularly China and Thailand, that ... Wikileaks ... is linked to U.S. cyber-warfare ... as well as to Mossad’s ... activities." The article went on to say that John Young, who runs Cryptome.org, "left Wikileaks, claiming the operation was a CIA front" - more on this later.
I contacted Mr Young regarding Wikileaks' connection to the CIA. His comment was :
On 2/18/11, John Young wrote : "I have tried on numerous occasions ... that the link between WL, Soros and the CIA has been misconstrued if it is traced to my remarks included in the two postings of the WL private mail list. I used such links as metaphorical examples, and both are so commonplace insults and jokes only a fool believes them. Assange has also joked about them according to press reports. There are much more dangerous associations than those two.
This is not to deny there is no link to either or both, only that I never stated that, and have posted messages on Cryptome denying it in the same terms I use here. The claim is a canard if not a hoary joke, like links to KGB, MI6, Mossad and ilk forever being bruited by fanners of flame, fame and infamy, not least by the perfidious agencies themselves. ... "
First,�Beck points out�that the Wikileaks are supported by a number of shady individuals and organizations, including Code Pink, communist Noam Chomsky, Michael Moore, Daniel Ellsburg, and MDS — the adult counterpart of SDS.
“Wikileaks once listed Soros connected Chinese human rights leader as one of its advisors…. They have since scrubbed the website. Too bad for Wikileaks and George Soros and everybody else that we have watchdogs that printed everything before it was scrubbed from the web.”
So if the networks did not get the info
from Julian, then who???
Originally posted by Kaploink
I have a feeling the talking heads on the major media outlets will focus on the leaker while ignoring the information in the emails. Get people to focus on that instead of the damaging information. It's the same pattern we saw with wikileaks.
Bank Of America "Leaks" Are A Total Letdown And The Source Is A Whiny Former Employee Read more: www.businessinsider.com...
Originally posted by Janky Red
I know some stuff first hand
They hired graduate student/astrophysicists (from Brown University) to restructure (code) their books in 2008...
I know this because a friend of the family was involved
I have been assured that NOBOBY will ever be able to figure out the truth
Julian Assange told Forbes he had troves of data that could take down a bank.
Last month it was revealed that Assange wasn’t sure about the negative impact of his BofA goods saying he isn’t sure the data he has on BofA contains any scandal, and that the material was not self-explanatory to the extent that he himself could not make any sense of it.