It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by kramtronix
So am I to understand this? The vast majority of people on this site find no problems with iran aligning themselves with the group that killed so many Americans on September 11, 2001? We give iran a free ride because they would "put up a fight?"
I just want to make sure I'm seeing this correctly.
Originally posted by kramtronix
So am I to understand this? The vast majority of people on this site find no problems with iran aligning themselves with the group that killed so many Americans on September 11, 2001? We give iran a free ride because they would "put up a fight?"
I just want to make sure I'm seeing this correctly.
Originally posted by kramtronix
So am I to understand this? The vast majority of people on this site find no problems with iran aligning themselves with the group that killed so many Americans on September 11, 2001? We give iran a free ride because they would "put up a fight?"
I just want to make sure I'm seeing this correctly.
So am I to understand this? The vast majority of people on this site find no problems with iran aligning themselves with the group that killed so many Americans on September 11, 2001? We give iran a free ride because they would "put up a fight?"
I just want to make sure I'm seeing this correctly.
Originally posted by persian
Jakomo is right.
For 50 years and until iran�s revolution, US been involve in Irans�s internal affairs. You can search on Yahoo under �CIA in Iran�
Originally posted by Agent47
So the fact that we interfered with their development justifies any assistance they gave to the 9/11 terrorists, the Iraqi insurgance, or their continued nuclear weapons program?
Originally posted by Agent47
Originally posted by persian
Jakomo is right.
For 50 years and until iran�s revolution, US been involve in Irans�s internal affairs. You can search on Yahoo under �CIA in Iran�
So the fact that we interfered with their development justifies any assistance they gave to the 9/11 terrorists, the Iraqi insurgance, or their continued nuclear weapons program?
Originally posted by kramtronix
So am I to understand this? The vast majority of people on this site find no problems with iran aligning themselves with the group that killed so many Americans on September 11, 2001? We give iran a free ride because they would "put up a fight?"
I just want to make sure I'm seeing this correctly.
Originally posted by kramtronix
Ideology aside, please...
Everyone, including DEMOCRATS, voted for the war in Iraq. [Fact]
Now that we have strong evidence that ties al-Qaeda to Iran, do we attack them now?
We took on Saddam with less evidence.
What kind of message are we sending if we leave Iran be?
Seriously, don't bring your party affiliation into this. I just want homest opinions.
Originally posted by koji_K
the majority of posts here seem to conclude that a.) iran IS a problem, but b.) war is not the best solution.
saudi arabia, on the other hand, the country which funded 9/11 and provided the manpower for it, DID get a "free ride". literally and figuratively. iran should not be top of our list of concern.
Originally posted by Eastern_Diamondback
Originally posted by koji_K
the majority of posts here seem to conclude that a.) iran IS a problem, but b.) war is not the best solution.
War would be an appropriate solution had Bush not screwed up and gone after Iraq instead. Now the question is not "do we attack Iran?" but rather "can we attack Iran?" And the answer is no, not in the manner in which we handled Iraq.
saudi arabia, on the other hand, the country which funded 9/11 and provided the manpower for it, DID get a "free ride". literally and figuratively. iran should not be top of our list of concern.
Iran should be at the top, WITH Saudi Arabia.