It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
... and the time that it was referred they put AA 77 on "guard" (9:15:15 am).
... what is Guard?
put AA 77 on "guard" (9:15:15 am).
Originally posted by roboe
Originally posted by Thermo Klein
The 12 minutes I refer to is the time from the last call to AA 77 (at 9:03:06 am) and the time that it was refered they put AA 77 on "guard" (9:15:15 am). The last contact with AA 77 was at 8:50:51 am, making the amount of time about 25 minutes of non-contact before the called an issue.
I think you've misunderstood what "on guard" means. When the "Guard" frequency is used, every single aircraft in the given area will hear it, regardless of what radio frequency they are tuned to. For obvious reasons it's not used very often, and then only as a last ditch effort to try and contact an aircraft that is not responding on their assigned frequency.
FAA and American Airlines knew from around 8.56 AM that there was an issue with AA77, but it was not yet confirmed as a hijack.
Originally posted by iSunTzu
What was ATC suppose to do? They keep trying to contact.
Originally posted by iSunTzu
and the controllers did not know the USA was under attack - the controller knows 77 did not report back. Non issue... Then find an ATC manual or expert to help you out.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by Thermo Klein
By your phrasing of this:
... and the time that it was referred they put AA 77 on "guard" (9:15:15 am).
It seem painfully clear to me that you don't understand the terms. I see that another pilot has already mentioned it, but not sure if his description cleared it up for you.
Originally posted by Thermo Klein
If there was airplane wreckage and a hole in the Pentagon and damaged cement or lawn I would never have questioned it, but it's clear as day that no airplane crashed there, in my opinion, so I feel as an American I should question the information to get a clear answer. Obviously after 9 years this debate is still going quite strong - WHY? because some people made up their minds long ago and refuse to change (OSers) and some people keep searching for the real factual evidence.
Originally posted by Thermo Klein
I prefer to go with common sense that given the situation they should have let someone know.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by Thermo Klein
You are not getting it....EVERY day, somewhere, an airplane stops responding to radio calls....for whatever reason. It was and is, very very common.
Your OP there was wrong, like this one. BTW, if you are going to say in one thread 77 did not impact the Pentagon, don't use evidence against your made up claim in another thread like this one. What happen to 77 in your fictional account of events?
Pentagon ruse in ATS history - I got 10 times more flags
Originally posted by Thermo Klein
reply to post by Reheat
just as a small point of comparison, I'm the author of the single most flagged thread concerning the Pentagon ruse in ATS history - I got 10 times more flags on that one thread than you have gotten on your current ATS account. When you can address pictures of the crash site and come with a decent battle instead of the constant character bashing then maybe we can have a conversation. All I see right now is a person who doesn't know how to deal with facts.
Tell me about the 12 minutes - please keep it to a few lines?
Originally posted by Reheat
Originally posted by Thermo Klein
I prefer to go with common sense that given the situation they should have let someone know.
Read that sentence over again and again and again. You have just identified your problem with why you are making false accusations and posting misleading information instead of informing yourself FIRST.
Originally posted by iSunTzu
reply to post by Thermo Klein
Which thread is your super Pentagon stuff in? Your OP makes no sense after you learn what guard was.
Did AIM help?
...if it were just some "everyday" I totally agree with you, but it wasn't - there had been two airline crashes into adjacent buildings! Someone ignoring a 12-minute non-contact on a day like 9/11 probably cost peoples' lives.
Originally posted by Thermo Klein
reply to post by Thermo Klein
Someone ignoring a 12-minute non-contact on a day like 9/11 probably cost peoples' lives.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
as was repeatedly mentioned, the controllers at Indy Center had NO IDEA of the happenings in New York.
Originally posted by Tosskey
The problem is, you make assumptions that the ATC knew that the was a terrorist plot going and that they knew the plane was hijacked, and still waited to report anything.
Originally posted by iSunTzu
reply to post by Thermo Klein
Which thread is your super Pentagon stuff in? Your not a 77 impact, which you now argue 77 lost radio contact. Your OP refutes your many flags fictional Pentagon thread. You showed proof of 77 impacting the Pentagon in your Pentagon thread, and now offer additional evidence, but in your Pentagon thread you produce fictional statements.
Your OP there was wrong, like this one. BTW, if you are going to say in one thread 77 did not impact the Pentagon, don't use evidence against your made up claim in another thread like this one. What happen to 77 in your fictional account of events?
Pentagon ruse in ATS history - I got 10 times more flags
Your OP makes no sense after you learn what guard was.
Did AIM help?edit on 10-3-2011 by iSunTzu because: flags...
Originally posted by Thermo Klein
Originally posted by weedwhacker
as was repeatedly mentioned, the controllers at Indy Center had NO IDEA of the happenings in New York.
prove it. your answer is speculation.
As a lowly reservations agent I knew about a crash within a minute, yet you claim air traffic ops centers wouldn't know? It's a poor argument but apparently it's all you guys have because you just keep parroting the same thing over and over again...
Originally posted by Ivar_Karlsen
Once they didn't respond ATC would assume that they had lost comm, and expect them to continue to destination.