It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by CandiceZ
Darwin is an idiot.
A monkey and a cucumber are cousins?
Right, and what about the evolution of the horse?
Species don't evolve from other species,
there has NEVER been a transitional fossil of ANY species from one to another, even from CRO-MAGNON MAN to HOMOSAPIEN.
And don't believe this "facts are the worlds data" crap unless you can prove it yourself, otherwise your going on someone else's PERCEPTION of the world's data. --- "Listen to everything, believe nothing, unless you can prove it''
Il probably get grief for this or ignored even, but its my opinion.
The guy didnt know what he was talking about.
Originally posted by CandiceZ
Darwin is an idiot.
A monkey and a cucumber are cousins?
Right, and what about the evolution of the horse?
Species don't evolve from other species ...
... there has NEVER been a transitional fossil of ANY species from one to another ...
... even from CRO-MAGNON MAN to HOMOSAPIEN.
And don't believe this "facts are the worlds data" crap unless you can prove it yourself, otherwise your going on someone else's PERCEPTION of the world's data. --- "Listen to everything, believe nothing, unless you can prove it''
Il probably get grief for this or ignored even, but its my opinion. The guy didnt know what he was talking about.
Originally posted by CandiceZ
I dont know, but Im not just going to go on some random guys perception on how we became to be.
We are not meant to know.
Evolution is Darwins opinion, doesnt mean it has to be mine as well just because it sounds like it could make sense.
Originally posted by CandiceZ
I dont believe the 'big bang' or the theory that we re the cousins of monkeys ect......
I think Intelligent Design is the theory I would most agree with.
Intelligent Design states that the universe and its inhabitants could not have evolved by the "blind chance" set forth by Darwin.
Unlike creationism, ID does not state that God is the intelligent designer.
It only says that there is clear evidence in nature of intelligent design.
It does not recognize the possibility of one species evolving from another, but it does acknowledge the possibility of slight evolutionary changes within one species.
Originally posted by ag893
I bet you $2Mil that Darwin is burning eternally in the dark pits of hell right now. Cause we all know he didn't go to Heaven. What do you say to people like that at their funeral? I really wonder what good things anyone had to say about him at his funeral service? That he was good man and is in a better place? Must have been pretty akward for a guy that didn't have Christ and convinced millions of americans that we somehow came from oragutans. I don't feel sorry for him regardless. He's led millions to hell along with him. You atheist and people of other beliefs can belief that BS that you are animals, I won't. Call me stupid and crazy. I'll be stupid and crazy on my way to Heaven instead of burning in Hell for an eternity! Simple as that! It all comes down to death. When it knocks on your door, you believe in lies like evolution and you don't have Christ, your whole has been basically a failure and worth nothing. Oh sure your studies may have convinced some people their true and facts but when death comes knocking at their door as well and they don't have Christ either, what was it worth? Your whole life thrown down in mere minutes. and paying for it with eternity?! My God. Some people are just too sad for words.
Originally posted by Anttyk47
Originally posted by CandiceZ
Darwin is an idiot. A monkey and a cucumber are cousins? Right, and what about the evolution of the horse? Species don't evolve from other species, there has NEVER been a transitional fossil of ANY species from one to another, even from CRO-MAGNON MAN to HOMOSAPIEN. And don't believe this "facts are the worlds data" crap unless you can prove it yourself, otherwise your going on someone else's PERCEPTION of the world's data. --- "Listen to everything, believe nothing, unless you can prove it''
Il probably get grief for this or ignored even, but its my opinion. The guy didnt know what he was talking about.
A scientist that created a theory of something like the origin of life. One whom should be respected in history for bringing such claims up in his time.
In the true sense of the term, i believe you to be the idiot for bringing absolutely nothing to the table, and ridiculing someone who spent his life for science. Even if the theory of evolution is false, it was only a theory, and it brought much knowledge to us. You should be thanking him.
-----edit---------
I dropped out of highschool yet i still understand the concept of evolution, but it seems you're too blind to even think about it
The theory states that:
One single cell organism split apart, into two. Now one mutation that could occur between the two (Evolution) could be that one is adapted to oceans, and the other to the shores.
Lets say the first organism created duplicated into ehh 100 same-copy organisms. Call em Class-A
Class-A drifts apart until one Class-A is 100 miles away from the spawn region.
Class-A 100 miles away adapts into a sunny area, and mutates into a more sun rich type thing organism Class-B
Class-B multiplies untill theres another mutation and so on.
Now theres Class-A and Class-Z (Z is from 26 mutations.) Class-Z looks more landlocked since it went to shore half way through mutations, and becomes Land plants. Class-B (the one that mutated differently than the A-Z line) turns into Animal-type cells.
Add a billion years, and we all have the same "Mother" Therefore we have cucumber cousins.edit onedit on 5-3-2011 by Anttyk47 because: (no reason given)
Correct, it is only a theory. Only a theory. This theory is taught as factual in school. That annoys me. extra DIV
Originally posted by CandiceZ
Originally posted by DerepentLEstranger
reply to post by CandiceZ
so what's your theory as to the origin of species and life in general?
I dont believe the 'big bang' or the theory that we re the cousins of monkeys ect......
I think Intelligent Design is the theory I would most agree with. Intelligent Design states that the universe and its inhabitants could not have evolved by the "blind chance" set forth by Darwin. Unlike creationism, ID does not state that God is the intelligent designer. It only says that there is clear evidence in nature of intelligent design.It does not recognize the possibility of one species evolving from another, but it does acknowledge the possibility of slight evolutionary changes within one species.