In the last month I set up a low power Television broadcast station in my residence. I connected the transmitter input to a roku box with Internet
access. The Roku box has an application that allows the user to search and stream videos from youtube. Furthermore, the app has an "autoplay" feature
that automatically chooses a video to play after another video has finished, so you can literally have 24 hours of automated video play.
I often think of a topic and then choose youtube videos accordingly, for example, one day I broadcast nothing but videos of Bob Lazar, then another
day, videos of Al Bielek lectures and interviews, the next day it was 12 hours of geoengineering videos by Dane Wigington, the day after that it was
12 hours of 9/11 false flag videos, and so on.
One day I decided to have an entire day of videos that deal with reverse speech:
According to "mainstream" science Reverse Speech is seen as a pseudoscience:
Though, as many have experienced in the last 10 years, "mainstream" science itself has exhibited many traits in common with their notions of
pseudoscience. This is especially noticeable when it comes to topics of importance to the power structure. So simply because a topic is labeled
pseudoscience does not mean it is so.
There are ways to test Reverse Speech, one such way is to use double blind reversal search. A group of people trained in reverse speech are randomly
selected, then they are all given the same audio clip to analyze. Then the results are compared, if indeed this is simply a case of pareidolia, and
there is absolutely NO reverse speech other than random sounds which people think sounds like words, then each reverse speech analysis should should
in essence be completely different from each other. If we get a large enough group or reverse speech analyzers, then the time at which samples are
chosen should eventually fit a random distribution.
Though this isn't what happens.
Researchers could also choose an audio clip in which a monolingual person is speaking a language that is unknown to all the reverse speech analyzers
chosen for the study. If indeed reverse speech is nothing but pareidolia, then the RS analyzers should find reversals.
Also, this doesn't happen.
Both of these results, though not conducted under strict double blind study and repeated sufficiently to ensure good statistics, do give some
indication that there is something of value in reverse speech.
As such the following Reverse Speech video is interesting:
I ran across the following video of Reverse Speech from Pope Francis: (warning the reversals deal with topics of an adult nature)
I was surprised to say the least, one would think that a holy man at that level would have thoughts that were pure, that dealt only with the
contemplation of God and what is good for all mankind. If indeed impure thoughts did arise that he would have such control that in such a public
situation, his thoughts would be appropriate.
Unfortunately, as many of have seen in the last 10+ years, those near the top of the power hierarchy are often the most corrupt, most depraved, and
most vicious. What is also surprising is that there were indications that Pope Francis may have "raped the other kid", could this be a reference to
This is consistent with the indications that pedophilia is rampant throughout the power structure of the U.S. and the world, as the allegations of
pizzagate have shown us. There have been few documentaries that dealt with this issue one such documentary is, Conspiracy of Silence:
The story described by the documentary wasn't limited to Nebraska, for even the FBI did not want to investigate and it was the accusers who were
punished for speaking out!! Some of the accusers even mentioned that they took tours of the White House at midnight.
There is another documentary that also deals with the topic of child abuse among the elites and that is "Boys for Sale":
One of the researchers in the documentary "Tom Philpott" makes it a point to mention that most if not all of those who participate in this practice
are often high level businessmen, managers, lawyers, doctors, politicians, basically those above a certain level of responsibility and with public
The Pope is certainly someone with a very high level of responsibility, public visibility, and power, so it isn't too difficult to imagine that he too
may be involved with such practices.
There are other more recent revelations:
It is getting more and more difficult for such people to hide what they do in the dark and what we can see isn't simply unrestrained hedonism but
rather it goes to the point of harming and possibly murdering children.
So in essence it becomes a crime.
edit on 7-7-2017 by deloprator20000 because: (no reason given)