Ancient Aliens Testable Predictions

a reply to: oldcarpy

I'm as clean as a baby's rear end, drug free baby!

I am simply searching for the truth, when it comes to UFOs, our government, organized stalking, cancer cures, basically everything, I want to search for the truth regarding everything!!

In regards to the theory, I made a mistake, the chemical is produced in the pancreas, not the spleen. Also B-17 is the next level of cancer protection after Trypsin.

Still, though we are on the verge of one of the greatest cures in human history.

Looks like the world is getting "watered down", watered down politics, watered down science, watered down research, watered down truth, watered down activists, watered down "hipsters" or whatever, etc.

The only thing that isn't watered down is the power elite's control, that's distilled, unaltered.

a reply to: deloprator20000

I have been a big fan of Ancient Aliens theories for a long time.
I feel convinced by the evidence.

I was on youtube listening to some audiobooks, like the Iliad and the Odyssey in hopes of listening to them so that I may broadcast them over my Low Power FM station, when I ran across an AudioBook Version of Mein Kampf:

youtu.be...

I was thinking Hitler and the Nazi's most likely had no connections to the Establishment, in other words, there is no way he and the other Nazi's could have access to what I am saying, doing, or thinking in the privacy of my own residence in 2017!!

As a refresher, ever since about 2008, I have been a Targeted Individual. As a targeted individual, I am (and many others) are subject to nearly constant harassment, noise harassment, street theater, helicopter harassment, and remote neural monitoring. Every T.I. experiences nearly the same types of harassment, with some minor differences. In my case I see that major figures in the media, like famous personalities, actors, musicians, scientists, news casters, radio talk show hosts, make references to what I am saying, doing, or thinking in the privacy of my residence.

This occurs even if the recordings were made in the distant past, I could be watching a movie from the 50s and they would make references, I could read a book from the 40s once again references, I could even be reading a book with material over 1000 years old like Meditations by Marcus Aurelius and even he, would make references to what I was doing, saying or thinking in my home in 2017!!! Same goes for the Iliad, I was thinking, you've got to be kidding me, you're telling me that whoever composed the Iliad had contact with beings that could see forward in time?

This implies that all of these important historical figures, can see what we are posting or watching online, just imagine Marcus Aurelius and Homer (the Greek Homer), or Hitler posting on the internet?? That's wild.

So when I was listening to Mein Kampf even Hitler made specific repeated reference to what I was saying, doing, or thinking in the privacy of my own residence. This means even Hitler was part of the system, he played a role for some purpose.

After seeing just how far back this Chronovision goes, at some point I became convinced that we may not be dealing with just regular human beings, if this manipulation goes back as far as 1000 or more years into the past we may be dealing with advanced humans, extra terrestrials, or a mixture of the two, who are guiding human history for some purpose.

a reply to: AgathaLorentz

Thanks for your post, I appreciate your support. It has been a long time since anyone has said words of encouragement.

I am considering testing Chronovision using writings from non-Western sources, for example reading the writing of well known leaders and generals from China, India, The Middle East, and Native America.

Also, I may be able to test Chronovision in a manner that is demonstrable to other people. For example I could wear spyglasses and watch a TV show that is being broadcast for the first time and that was not available online before that time. Then I could correlate what I am saying, doing, or thinking in the process of my own residence with what is said or done in the TV show.

I believe it was Richard Dolan and other UFO researchers who put forth the idea of a breakaway civilization who has access to technology that may be 100 or 1000 years more advanced. If these UFO and Aliens have been visiting earth for millions of years then it would be possible for humans, in the distant past, to have had contact with these beings and to then have access to technology that is 1000's more advanced. So it could be that these humans like the Greek Homer, like Marcus Aurelius to have been in contact with these aliens and to have access to technology that could see into the future.

Wouldn't it be interest if it was some person's job to live in the past and run an empire. They would be raised in our modern or future time and yet travel back in time to be the emperor of some region, that is wild. They would make history, they would be major figures in the past.

If the large mainstream media channels are, for the most part, owned by large corporate and financial interests and these large corporate and financial interests also "own" much of the government and the main concern of these interests is control of ideas, concepts, world events, politics, populations, etc, then do we really believe that they would let just anyone appear in their media?

I believe John Judge said something that is very true "if you have heard of someone, it usually means they're no good" and from I have experienced in the last couple of years, I find that to be very true.

The reason why is that before the proliferation of the Internet, most information flowed in one direction from the media to the population. From a few radio and television broadcast towers to millions of radio and TV sets, from a few news papers publishers to millions of readers, from a few news gathering organizations to the network and then to the millions if not billions of people around the world. So the few corporations and/or financial interests that own these news gathering organization can manipulate, guide, and control the public simply by controlling or more accurately framing, in the appropriate manner, all the news, entertainment, and education released to the public.

This implies that they must have some type of control of any idea, any concept, any movement, any person that is given significant exposure on their channels. This also implies that any person who is given significant exposure on their media channels most likely is under the influence or control of some large interest, a secret society, an intelligence agency, a banking interest, a large corporation, etc. Much of the time this has proven true, for anyone who is given significant amounts of exposure in the mainstream media.

One such person that has been given significant amount of mainstream media attention, though often portrayed as an extremist is Louis Farrakhan:

en.wikipedia.org...

Now why would I focus on such a figure, well he was given significant mainstream exposure in the mid 90s with the million man march:

en.wikipedia.org...

To be allowed to rise to the position of influence that could organize approximately 800,000 people and to be given that much media exposure and to never be subject to intense harassment by the government or it's agencies, should tell us something.

It also appears as if there is an attempt by someone, some entity to try to ensure that certain people are not given credit for significant ideas or inventions, and/or their ideas are dismissed as being derivative. This was very common with women, African American men, and races in the U.S. and possibly around the world before the 1960s. Innovative ideas were downplayed and dismissed and in many cases these people were sabotaged to make, other people feel better about their lives, if you can believe that!!! Often members of the aforementioned communities were given exposure in the entertainment industry like music, theater, acting, movies, and even then it was all contingent on how certain people feel. Though entertainment is important, accomplishments in other fields are often seen to be more important or at least important in ways that confer a different more prestigious level of publicity.

It's all about how their feelings, so lets sabotage people, take their ideas and make myself feel good about stealing and denying people opportunities.

Well it looks as if this has come full circle, for it appears as if not only are my ideas stolen and given to people the power elite think deserve to be given public credit, most often white males (often a little hickish and believe in the ole 88), it also appears as if there is a contingent of African American people who also want to sabotage a person or people of a certain race, so that the general public will view this race as being on the same level as themselves. So, even though they are not given the ideas or cannot take credit for them, they rest assured that the another race is also not given credit.

This appears to be not only restricted to African Americans but also to people of different racial background around the world. Their reasoning is something like, if this race can't get their act together, what business do "they" have telling us what to do. So most governmental organizations opt to present a European person to tell other countries what to do, because other countries who have had a history of colonialism are used to having Europeans, mostly males, tell them what to do. They see a brown face and they get sharp pains down the left arm, sweats, heart palpitations, they get the taste of copper in their mouths, they reach for their prescriptions drugs, they immediately think, what does this person know, why don't they fix the problems in their own country, why don't you get a white guy who obviously knows what he is talking about.

So ideas are given to someone of a race that most people around the world would consider to be worthy of having the ideas and receiving credit for the ideas.

I have recently become cognizant of certain cultural trends in the U.S. that began around 2008. There has been a tendency for cultural trends to lean or go in the direction of the being more conservative, more religious, more, as is known in the U.S., Right Wing. Often this was not actively intended but, sometimes, it was advocated passively by suppressing dissent, suppressing what some may consider to be eccentric, or too creative, beyond the "mainstream".

It also appears as if certain forces, influential people, groups, corporations, entities first identified every way humans group themselves, whether it be racial, ethnic, national, political interests, technological interests, educational interests, scientific interest, any and every way people can group themselves.

It appears that once they identified a group they sought out the most conservative, the most intolerant, the most close minded, the most resentful, the most envious, the most jealous etc and gave them influence and control over the culture. They weren't chosen based on talent, or merit, or ability no it was politically motivated to push the world culture in the religious-conservative direction.

As such it created divisions among all these groups at all levels, most likely it was intentional, as a means to sabotage any group from acting in a coordinated fashion. So most public and visible groups are not mostly conservative, religious, and intolerant.

In my case, if I express an opinion that is critical of their policies or points out an contradiction, an error, something they overlooked all of sudden they strike back with the word "bean" or "coconut", that's all they can do. This happens most often in movies, some director who had his lips on someone's buttcheeks, comes out with a "bean" or "coconut" if I am critical of their movie. If they have to rely on insults to get good reviews, that means they don't have the talent and they should instead be picking up coffee for a most talented director.

As I have explained in previous posts, from my experience, it appears as if nearly all modern electronic devices can monitor what we are saying, doing, or even thinking! Not only that, it appears as if the surveillance system can set information back in time, so that when a movie or any other media affiliated with the system, has access to what people will say, do or think in the future.

Also look out for the word "Love" because the surveillance system often uses the word when they are stealing ideas or harassing a person. Either they have a very distorted notion of "Love" and/or their notion agrees with more traditional notion, yet they "Love" someone, some group, something, just not us.

I have seen in the last couple of years a rise in the popularity of videos on youtube that espouse or promote directly or sometimes indirectly "conservative" or "right wing" points of view. This is consistent with the cultural changes that have taken place in the U.S. and world in the last 10 years. In essence the world has become more "conservative".

youtu.be...

This did not take place through direct political action and rational argument, rather the change took place at the level of behavior, attitude, emotion, dress, image, and body language. It took place in the change of artistic tastes and creative processes. In essence, the change took place at the level of the unconscious, hence it subverted the traditional defenses of thought and reason.

Though this paradigm may have positive aspects in terms of personal behavior and responsibility, because it does not function at the level of reason and thought, it is incapable of reaching or grasping the truth of anything, really.

Even though many "conservatives" may portray themselves as being dominant physically and intellectually and as being the standard bearers of moral behavior and rectitude, they are really chastising the poor, the weak, and the defenseless. They chastise feminists and feminism, cuckolds (they have issues with sex), gay people, minorities, immigrants, Marxists,socialists, multiculturalism, music, movies, dissidents, free discussions, etc. In the common parlance they are beating up on those who can't defend themselves. They feel so strong, so powerful when they beat up on the poor and the weak. Oddly enough, despite being poor, defenseless, and decadent, the conservatives blame these very same people for "the decline of western civilization".

Though if you present to these strong, powerful, and dominant people the true causes of the supposed decline of western civilization they go into denial. Even if you present very strong arguments supported by accurate data, they still deny and ignore. It is easy to beat up on the weak, but how about trying to face down the wealthy and powerful, supported by the might and power of the military industrial complex?? What happened to all their strength all their bravado, all their courage?? They may lift much weight in the gym but can they lift the mental weight of the truth? They may have sculpted their bodies but can they sculpt their minds?

In fact they only seem to feel so strong when they are protecting the official story, the interests of the powerful, only when they deny accurate narratives and data, in essence they only feel strong when they have the backing of the bankers, the military, the spy agencies, the police, and other like them. It gives the appearance of strength, when in reality they have given in.

a reply to: AgathaLorentz

Thank you for your reply, the last 8 years has been difficult for myself and for ET researchers in general. Personally I believe very little will change in regards to actual ET disclosure, though we will keep on trying.