It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by hooper
I can imagine that there are much more secure areas in the USA.
Fort Knox.
The Federal Reserve Banks.
The Mint.
Sheesh....even the TSA Headquarters! (Well, with all the anger against them,not surprising....)
Originally posted by FDNY343
I'll tell you what, hindsight really is 20/20 isn't it? I am sure the DoD knows alot more about their building security needs than an obscure guy on an internet forum does. Just saying.
I would hope that even before 9-11, a building that housed the top military officials for all branches of the US armed forces would have at least tried to match the incredible security of Quickie Mart.
Originally posted by network dude
Originally posted by FDNY343
I'll tell you what, hindsight really is 20/20 isn't it? I am sure the DoD knows alot more about their building security needs than an obscure guy on an internet forum does. Just saying.
I would hope that even before 9-11, a building that housed the top military officials for all branches of the US armed forces would have at least tried to match the incredible security of Quickie Mart. So yea, I agree. And that is the point of this thread. I think that there were several camera angles that should have at least been pointed in that general direction, and I would be very surprised if none of them were set to record any and all information they saw. Since I am just some obscure guy on the internet, nothing I say will matter to anyone except the few who read this thread, and even may not to them. I am just discussing this like I do most topics on this site. While our government certainly must have some boneheads in it, I find it hard to believe that they put all of them in charge of security.
ha-ha! it's not about "every square inch", mr. smartypants. it's just about those few feet where the boeing
hit the pentagon. jeez. it's not that difficult to understand. hope this helps.
Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by psyop911
ha-ha! it's not about "every square inch", mr. smartypants. it's just about those few feet where the boeing
hit the pentagon. jeez. it's not that difficult to understand. hope this helps.
Ok wiseguy - please tell me why they would have a security camera trained on that area? Just in case a plane were going to hit it at some time in the future?
errrm, i guess so. what do you think? seriously. why do you think there were cameras all over
the pentagon and the surrounding areas? to check when the ice-cream truck arrives? domino's
truck? i'm confuzed.are you?
Originally posted by FDNY343
Wait, so the local Quickie Mart has armed security guards and the cameras are monitored 24/7/365 by a live person? STFU!!! REALLY?!?!?!?
Security cameras are a tool that are used by the security personel. Not an actual deterrant.
Originally posted by psyop911
reply to post by Xcathdra
dude, why are you posting 5 frames that show 'michael moore heading for the buffett table'?
i'm seriously confuzed now.
And Hooper, the Quickie Mart has cameras looking at the gas pumps to catch drive offs.
So if a huge passenger jet was to crash into the front of it, the camera would at least be pointing at it.
Just like the cameras on the wall of the pentagon have to have been pointed somewhere.
Originally posted by Xcathdra
Originally posted by psyop911
reply to post by Xcathdra
dude, why are you posting 5 frames that show 'michael moore heading for the buffett table'?
i'm seriously confuzed now.
What are you talking about?