It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by thecritta
Originally posted by Six Sigma
I turned up my speakers 100%. Did Richard Gage wire this building with his own "Hush-A-Bombs?"
Where are the booms?
Compare the OP video to this one: (Again)
Liar caught out again here are your BOOMS right here in this video note how this video
directly supports and corroborates Kevin Pc Padden's Testimony especially the part
where he speaks about and describes hearing the BOOM BOOM sound right before
the building comes down i guess this video proves Kevin Mc Padden is not lying after
all it corroborates his account, this proves the building was imploded you cant escape
it give it up already NIST has just proven how guilty they are by releasing edited video's of
wtc 7 coming down with no sound at all and all a sudden they release one with sound
which reveals the signature sound of an inevitable controlled implosion.
Rising Waves Blow WTC7 East Penthouse - buildingwhat.org
www.youtube.com...
Have fun dee bunking this video i wonder what pathetic nonsense you will spew out now.
Originally posted by dillweed
reply to post by hooper
That's just it, I don't know what could cause someone to put in question their honor. Only a liar or a complete idiot would defend the official story. Because I don't believe you are an idiot, don't you have any sense of self worth? Have you no honor, man?
Originally posted by Seventh
So let me get this straight, Fire Chiefs decide to remove all their personal from a steel building after witnessing 1st hand what had happened to two steel buildings earlier in the day, this proves what exactly?. (apart from the laws of physics and structures built to withstand planes hitting them and the respective fires, had been bent beyond belief and this could be a case of building number 3 following suit so let`s get our men the f&^k out of there).
Nothing to see here.
Originally posted by Alfie1
Originally posted by Seventh
So let me get this straight, Fire Chiefs decide to remove all their personal from a steel building after witnessing 1st hand what had happened to two steel buildings earlier in the day, this proves what exactly?. (apart from the laws of physics and structures built to withstand planes hitting them and the respective fires, had been bent beyond belief and this could be a case of building number 3 following suit so let`s get our men the f&^k out of there).
Nothing to see here.
You seem to be deliberately misunderstanding the situation. Fire personnel were withdrawn in the afternoon because it was obvious that WTC 7 was becoming progressively more unstable.
Here is a firefighter describing it :-
www.youtube.com...
Originally posted by Shadow Herder
reply to post by Six Sigma
The debunkers are staying clear of threads like this and are collectively bumping and propagating the no planer threads. Go figure.edit on 7-2-2011 by Shadow Herder because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Alfie1
reply to post by Six Sigma
Which hardly squares with a cd.
The pauses and blasts were spread out throughout the day
Why didnt the WTC 1,2,7 fall over like these buildings?
Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by Shadow Herder
Definition: Recurring in scattered and irregular or unpredictable instances.
So you're contending that the fires in Building 7 kept going out and starting bak up again? Instance is a reference to time. Sorry, not buying it. You've shown no proof that the fires extinguished before the building collapsed. And are you still maintaining that outcome must always compliment the cause?
Come off it mate, talk about being contrary for the sake of it!
You know exactly what the OP means by 'sporadic' fires...if not, i'd suggest avoiding posts that make you appear to be a buffoon, and go and read a dictionary definition for the word 'sporadic'.
Arguing for the sake of it is not going to get you or anyone else at the truth of this matter, unless you're more interested in obfuscation, then by all means ask again what the OP means by sporadic fires..
Originally posted by Shadow Herder
reply to post by GoodOlDave
There you debunkers go again..... not debunking anything...... just wasting characters on screen........
Wtc7 came down in a controlled manner. Eyewitnesses and experts all agree that it was brought down on purpose ain a controlled demolition fashion. I recommend you people not aware of WTC 7 to investigate on multiple sites and not just truther sites. Gather all the info you can and make up your own mind and when you realize that WTC 7 was a controlled demolition come to know that you are not alone. Welcome to the new world.edit on 2-2-2011 by Shadow Herder because: (no reason given)