It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Sporadic fires would only contribute to an uneven, chaotic collapse....
Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by Shadow Herder
Sporadic fires would only contribute to an uneven, chaotic collapse....
How so? Is there a rule that says the outcome must compliment the cause? Also, please be advised that what you are stating are your word choices - no facts. Sporadic is your word choice. What is a sporadic fire?
Definition: Recurring in scattered and irregular or unpredictable instances.
Watching 'the group' try to defend number seven's death by fire story is sad.
This must be their hardest evidence to watch.
The ONLY buildings in history to collapse due to fire.
What on earth motivates someone to defend such an obvious lie?
The ONLY buildings in history to collapse due to fire. You, of course, have a way to substantiate that statement, correct?
Excepting the three 9-11 collapses, no fire, however severe, has ever caused a steel-framed high-rise building to collapse. Following are examples of high-rise fires that were far more severe than those in WTC 1 and 2, and Building 7. In these precedents, the fires consumed multiple floors, produced extensive window breakage, exhibited large areas of emergent flames, and went on for several hours. The fires in the WTC towers did none of these things.
.The fires which presumably were burnng "out of control" because there was a lack of water with which to fight, Could have been easily quenched using the fireboats that lay alonside the complex,doing nothing.
The pumping power of just one boat could have supplied water needed.
What on earth motivates someone to defend such an obvious lie?
What do you think?
Originally posted by dillweed
reply to post by hooper
That's just it, I don't know what could cause someone to put in question their honor. Only a liar or a complete idiot would defend the official story. Because I don't believe you are an idiot, don't you have any sense of self worth? Have you no honor, man?