It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by 23432
How hard is it to imagine an existence of a Field which enforces a sets of rules upon all that is within ?
How do you make the fish realise that they are the living water at the same time they are living in the water , which sits on a land mass , all together hurtling into space-time , travelling thru The Field ?
would the fish care ?
Do you think that the Field has some inherent information which dictates how energy becomes matter ?
Lipton does.
Originally posted by Mary Rose
Originally posted by Mary Rose
I’m reading the 51 page .pdf file “Magnetic Current” by Ed Leedskalnin.
The .pdf is available at freeenergynews.com: "Index of /Directory/Magnets/Leedskalnin."
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
How much scientific evidence does it take to persuade you that your intuition is wrong? Is there any conceivable amount or is it an impossible task?
Originally posted by Mary Rose
This is my intuition speaking to me. It's too showy. It doesn't ring true to me.
Arb,
look -- Mary keeps saying that "we haven't isolated an electron". I admit that I'm not 100% what it means, but if I venture to interpret that, it seems to be saying that "we don't know properties of the electron", or "we can't measure interactions electrons have with other objects", or "I don't believe atomic structure of matter", or some combination of the above. All of this is bogus, of course, and simply means that Mary has no interest in learning facts. So I understand that no amount of scientific evidence can persuade Mary.
Originally posted by Mary Rose
I noticed that Leedskalnin says on page 25 of 51 that the North and South Pole magnets are the “cosmic force.” He said they hold together the earth and everything on it.
Originally posted by playswithmachines
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
IMO the misconception occurs because gravity, a so-called weak force, can strech for zillions of miles, while magnetism, is a force that works over relatively short distance.
They are linked, but i would not place any bets on Rodins model being right......
Originally posted by Mary Rose
I've been going through my stack of research print-outs this morning. One of them is "RodinAerodynamics.org - featuring the Rodin Coil" which I printed in 2007.
The repeating number pattern that solves pi and demonstrates it to be a whole number.
Originally posted by Mary Rose
reply to post by -PLB-
Wow! Such an educated response.
I remember Dale Pond making a comment about the importance of whole numbers. And I did some searches and noted something about the Bible saying that pi is 3. Not that the Bible is an authority; it's just interesting.
I glanced through a physics forum discussion where someone asked what would happen if we eventually discovered that pi is a rational number.
Originally posted by Mary Rose
I remember Dale Pond making a comment about the importance of whole numbers.
Originally posted by Phage
Last time I checked a whole number is not the same thing as a rational number.
Originally posted by Phage
All whole numbers are rational numbers. Not all rational numbers are whole numbers.
Originally posted by Mary Rose
Lately I've enjoyed thumbing through this print-out again.
Since the Bahai sacred scripture was originally written in Persian and Arabic Marko used the Abjad numerical notation system for this letter to number translation. This was a sacred system of allocating a unique numerical value to each letter of the 27 letters of the alphabet so that secret quantum mechanic physics could be encoded into words.