It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by KingKeever1611
From the Holy Bible, as found in Genesis 9:25-27. The one stop place for knowledge, wisdom, understanding and salvation.
Genesis 9:25-27: "Cursed be Canaan! The lowest of slaves will he be to his brothers. He also said, 'Blessed be the Lord, the God of Shem! May Canaan be the slave of Shem. May God extend the territory of Japheth; may Japeth live in the tents of Shem and may Canaan be his slave'.
Originally posted by KingKeever1611
Originally posted by Movescamp
I don't know where you got the notion there are three racial groups....
From the Holy Bible, as found in Genesis 9:25-27. The one stop place for knowledge, wisdom, understanding and salvation. Where else would one come across a history of this planet's inhabitants? From scientists?
Please, every day science is changing and finding out "some new discovery!" that proves the previous "discoveries" wrong! Its sad really, the blind faith people put in science, which in turn, are just other people!!! Just look at some of the recent posts on ATS for a quick example of science recently changing as well as origin theories. Man trusting in man for hope. Read: 1 Corinthians 15:19
Secondly, I was not talking about ethnic groups, I said "race" and meant it. There is not one race called the human race, there are three. Each look different, smell different, have vastly different cultures, songs, food, and religions. Trust something that never changes, like the Holy Bible, not science that is slowly trying to "catch up" to the Bibles revelations.
Originally posted by JohnnyCanuck
You made a straightforward statement of fact, and I'd like to know where that fact came from.
See above remarks ↑
Originally posted by Movescamp
reply to post by LUXUS
Have you read the article? Are you saying these mummies from 1800 b.c. Are from Atlantis? It is well known that siberian transit of humans both mongoloid and Caucasoid have happened in that era. The controversy is over Chinese nationalism not some great mystery. That's why Nissim is a quack. Look at a map read some anthropology most of the mummies were mongoloid and there were cuacasoids as well. Siberia has always been home to some caucasoids. It has been known for a long time.
If you don't mind, I prefer to see how thinking people of today assess our knowledge base as opposed to falling back upon what remains of a few millenia of middle eastern social history that's been tweaked by every self-serving power base since.
Sorry...the Bible is proof that a lot of people don't have the wherewithal to think for themselves...and very little else. Therefore I reject your assertion that the Inuit are Semitic. In fact I will go so far as to say so on their behalf.
Originally posted by orangetom1999
JohnnyCanuck,
If you don't mind, I prefer to see how thinking people of today assess our knowledge base as opposed to falling back upon what remains of a few millenia of middle eastern social history that's been tweaked by every self-serving power base since.
Sorry...the Bible is proof that a lot of people don't have the wherewithal to think for themselves...and very little else. Therefore I reject your assertion that the Inuit are Semitic. In fact I will go so far as to say so on their behalf.
Your public education non standards are seriously showing here. You mean to tell me that public education standards and modern intelligentsia cannot be "Tweaked" by every self serving power base that is to be found out there??
An intelligent Individual checks it all out for veracity. This tweaking is obviously going on today in secular arenas. All one has to do is check out the contrast in news/media formats which shill for the body politic.
Originally posted by JohnnyCanuck
I have been graced with some education in anthropology and archaeology, as well as in historical research.
But, I can give you numerous examples of those paradigm shifts. Changes in the Bible...indeed, in Christianity... have been based upon expediency and in who is running the priesthood.
I willingly acknowledge a higher order, but nothing has dumbed down the Western world so much as that plastic document known as the Holy Bible. One can live one's life according to it's moral precepts...but the world is a lot older than 6000 years...and if you don't buy into it all then you shatter its paramountcy.
Which is to say...howz Leviticus treating you these days? Play football?
I have been graced with some education in anthropology and archaeology, as well as in historical research. Yes, there may be academic bias but on the whole it is based in the highest level of knowledge of the day, and which requires serious endevour to change.
But, I can give you numerous examples of those paradigm shifts. Changes in the Bible...indeed, in Christianity... have been based upon expediency and in who is running the priesthood.
I willingly acknowledge a higher order, but nothing has dumbed down the Western world so much as that plastic document known as the Holy Bible. One can live one's life according to it's moral precepts...but the world is a lot older than 6000 years...and if you don't buy into it all then you shatter its paramountcy.
Which is to say...howz Leviticus treating you these days? Play football?
Then you know the Bible has been proven not only true, but factual correct in it's historic record.
And yes, catholics have for years tampering around with "their" bibles, just as they are doing today with over 223 different "versions" for sale.
Which is to say...howz Leviticus treating you these days? Play football?
Originally posted by orangetom1999
Good Grief Johnny Cannuck,
Your public education non standards are showing on you again. I am given to ask if you cannot help yourself here. It is the only yardstick by which you can know or measure.
As to Football..either the European or American type...I do not worship at the alter of nor idolize the gods of sports. No use for it nor the products advertised. Not for me thanks.
I know from Lev. 11:6-8 that touching the skin of a dead pig makes me unclean, but may I still play football if I wear gloves? www.humanistsofutah.org...
“Never try to teach a pig to sing; it wastes your time and annoys the pig.”
Originally posted by KingKeever1611
Originally posted by JohnnyCanuck
I have been graced with some education in anthropology and archaeology, as well as in historical research.
Then you know the Bible has been proven not only true, but factual correct in it's historic record.
I'm a Biblical Christian, not a Roman catholic and I do care much for their "priesthood". I am a priest according to the New testement and I do not need a "man" such as a catholic priest to pray for me.
And yes, catholics have for years tampering around with "their" bibles, just as they are doing today with over 223 different "versions" for sale.
Within two hundred years of 1519 and Martin Luther getting away and founding the Lutheran Church..it began to be noticed by writers that there was a difference in the standard of living in the Catholic areas under Rome and other areas not under Rome.
Remember now..this is the areas where the so called "White Men" lived. The so called superior white men.
A significant disparity in the standard of living under white men and other white men.
What I am telling you and what is avoided in your "Public School " educations ..is that it was never a matter of Race...it was a matter of religion. For not all "White Men " did well. This is obvious when you consider the economic status of Soviet Russia and the Nations under the yoke of the Soviets following WW2. These are areas where many "White Men " dwelled.
You have to go to public schools here in America to get so dumb so as not to be able to realize this on your own. The public school system has a vested interest in the ignorance of Americans in this arena for the purpose of keeping them backwards ...by "Victim Dictum": and :" Guilt Politics" 'Race" techniques. And they have been remarkably successful in this.
Ha ha ha..."deny ignorance" she cried!
You miss the context...
I know from Lev. 11:6-8 that touching the skin of a dead pig makes me unclean, but may I still play football if I wear gloves? www.humanistsofutah.org...
You figure that the Bible was written in English, and has always been comprised of exactly what you see in the KJV? Then I think you ought to poke around on the subject a little.
Incidentally, this is totally off topic, which is another reason to conclude this conversation. Apologies for derailing the thread.
Originally posted by KingKeever1611
Sooooo, in conclusion I don't believe there are any primitive white cultures, not in the last 1,000 years at least. I believe cultures that are primitive choose to be primitive and are not willing to change.
Examples can be seen right here in America with the growing primitive class of welfare recipients who refuse to change unless forced to. Such was the case with British imperialism (whites) throughout the world that "civilized" many different people they happened across.
As for the Mennonites, Amish, and various other brethren groups they are not primitive in the sense of the word we are using in this discussion. They speak articulately, cloth themselves!!!, and don't kill there own people with machetes over racial discrimination.
P.s. Canadian, don't get your information from a "West Wing" hollywood TV show....it really shows your depth of research...
Originally posted by Movescamp
reply to post by orangetom1999
Well I went o Fordham university so I don't think you can make those claims. Also most colleges are private.
If you don't read ancient Greek or aramaic then you too are subject to manipulation. Especially the born agains who use the king James bible. I mean really the bible translated for and by a king. You have no idea what the texts really say unless you read ancient languages. Other wise you are just taking every major king or queen the world has ever known word for it. And if the powers can be can manipulate public education they can manipulate religious text. Look at how people site Romans as an anti gay propaganda. While all Jesus says is not to treat a man as woman. The context is under that the Romans raped men to humiliate the
Not it's a sin to be gay. Infact Christ was ultimately compassionate and alas different then all abrahamic profits. It's in complete opposition to Christs teachings to judge. Only god can judge. The ego mania of modern Christian faiths is obvious. Christ was humble and accepted everyone who was humble. The bible has been manipulated to not reflect the power of compassion through self descipline but rather to just accept Christ as your lord and savior. It is totally in opposition from the teachings of the Essenes and Gnostics which Christ came through.
Most modern Christians don't even understand the Essenes or why they are so important.
Anyhow that is off topic but
edit on 10-1-2011 by Movescamp because: (no reason given)
It's in complete opposition to Christs teachings to judge. Only god can judge.
Originally posted by JohnnyCanuck
So...while your statement may apply to someone's depth of research...it ain't mine.
Originally posted by orangetom1999
You are indeed correct in that a Bible can be manipulated by a King as well as by scholars.
What is known by scholar and historians both is that there was in the time of King James Bibles existing in English. The one written by John Wycliffe, The Great English Bible...the one used by the settlers to Jamestown, Virginia, William Tyndale';s version of the Bible and others.
I am of Issac..and not of Ishmael.