It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Where do the primitive white cultures live?

page: 16
24
<< 13  14  15    17 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 10 2011 @ 07:00 PM
link   
reply to post by KingKeever1611
 



orangetom1999,

I have really enjoyed reading your posts, you seem very knowledgeable about true history and not government funded education. That statement alone should be more than enough for people of this site to not trust and always question their secular education.

I may write a clear, short and easy to read history of the english Bible through its seven different languages, and its seven different english translation some time and post it in the religious forum. I will no doubt need help...




KingKeever1611,

You are most certainly welcome. I hope I have helped you and some of the other readers to this thread.

I also hope and pray that you comprehend my references to Issac and Ishmael ..when I say I am of Issac and not of Ishmael.

I have read the passages from Galatians chapter 4 beginning about verse 21 for years ..over and over. It is one of my favorite passages concerning the two brothers through Abraham. And yet this never occurred to me until some time in the last year.

What was to help me in this view and understanding was of course Prayer and also the tying together of some loose ends on which I had also been studying. That loose end is occult studies and out of occult studies/occult religions came the concept and understanding of counterfeits/counterfeit doctrine/dogma. How to spot a counterfeit in religious dogma and practice. There are many of them and even attempting to infiltrate Christianity as they were doing with the Law of Moses. They are no such thing and are of the counterfeiter..if you know the pattern.

Do not misunderstand me here. Would that I had a better education than I currently possess. I am not against education. I am against counterfeits or counterfeit education. I do however know that many college professors and I would not get along. I am not against secular education as long as I know that is what I am getting. For I will obviously contrast this with the Word.
I am not against science....I am a machinist and a nuclear fueler by trade. I do however..think science would make a very very poor religion. Yet so many attempt to explain everything with religious zeal as if science is a religious template to follow. For you see...I am well aware that science has put us in better clothes, better homes, more food...better cars..et al. But it has not made us better peoples...better consumers..yes..better peoples no...not happening.

This is what one learns when one begins to think outside the box of what passes for greatness, public education, and self promotion..so popular today.

Also KingKeever1611..I have been well instructed in history by knowledgeable elders in the Church. Not only in certain aspects of the Word as history but also in certain aspects of secular history...even some of the secular history someone does not want us to know for the significance of what it represents.

I happen to have a very archaic belief that people are so much more than sex and sexuality. Much much more.
And it verily disgusts me how much sex and sexuality someone has sold to our children now days. No more time to just be a child. I find this a very sad state of affairs.

I also happen to think that people are so much more than race and race issues. Also very archaic.

I also have a concept and belief that politics is a very devout and zealous religion. Politics is neither the religion nor product advertised. Thinking peoples know this because they know that any legitimate business which does not deliver the product advertised..would soon be out of business.
Politics is one of the devout religions/businesses where one need not deliver the product advertises and people return back ..over and over to the voting booth and never seem to catch on. Politics will also sell, barter, and trade the very souls of anyone ..for lucre...votes.
What is needed here is another religion..another system....and possibly an Exodus from the current political system/religion.
A religion which is not the religion advertised is a counterfeit and of the counterfeiter...it is that simple. And politics pays for and finances pubic education..through college levels.

Another counterfeit doctrine and practice one who knows out here and sees quite often is that the Church is often defaulted by public education to be Rome. It is not so. So many incorrectly use/misuse Rome to represent all of Christianity by default. This is something that once you know...you will catch it often. Atheists often attempt this very template. They are predictable in this pattern.

Primitive white cultures is another counterfeit because of the reasons I outlined here. As I stated..this is missing from your pubic educations because we are never supposed to think this far or on our own.
It was not that long ago that some of the superior "White men " were running around causing chaos and painting themselves blue. White men..LOL LOL LOL. Wow!!!

Well you get the point..not all is as appears nor as taught in public schools.

Education is fine as long as you know what it is you are getting. You don't have to believe it all as many on threads like this one have done. You just have to be able to shovel it back to them sufficient to get the sheepskin.

Yes..I would like to read your post on the translation of the English Bible through its seven different languages. That would make for some very interesting reading. I look foreward to this.
Please send me a private message when you have posted such and I can find the thread.

Thanks,
Orangetom

edit on 10-1-2011 by orangetom1999 because: (no reason given)




posted on Jan, 10 2011 @ 07:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by Turiddu


Now going back 50-100 years, certain white ethnic groups lived the ancient ways of their ancestors in mainly clan/tribal settings. These groups include:

-Albanians
-Chechens and other North Caucasians
-Rural Sicilians
-Rural Greeks
-Greek Cretans
-Greek Cypriots

Going back 150-200 years you could probably include some of the Irish and Scots.


Most of the people you have listed, with the exception of the Greeks, lived under foreign rule during and before the time frame you have mentioned.They were subjugated people.Have a look at the Penal Laws instituted in Ireland by the British government.Scotland lays claim to some of the oldest known examples of civilisation.Sicily has been invaded many times, by Moors,Romans and Normans to name a few.I do not think these are accurate examples.

Generally, conquerors tend to "decivilise" the indigenous population by trashing their language,customs and history and in many cases their genealogy.Perhaps the real primitive white tribes are the ones who subjugate their fellow men in such a manner, the ones who commit millions of their own to the carnage of World Wars and colonialism.Their "sophistication" is built on a foundation cemented with the blood,sweat and tears of those they have vanquished.

edit on 10-1-2011 by blah yada because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 25 2011 @ 10:59 PM
link   
reply to post by JohhnyBGood
 


Ironically its likely that the Caucasian genes you speak of in Egypt came from the Black Nubians in the area. This next line I am quoting from a page [www.roadtoegypt.com/egypt-information/egypt-people.html] listing the differen't Ethnic groups currently in Egypt......"Dark skinned Nubians inhabit the narrow valley south of Aswan. Although modern studies have been unable to establish the ancestry of the Nubian people or trace changes in the race through history, they carry predominantly Caucasian genes and appear unrelated to other Africans. These people once farmed the narrow margins of the river, planting palm groves along its edge. Hoisting triangular lateen sails above their boats, they hauled rock, transported villagers, and fished the clear, cold Nile.
A distinct group for centuries, the Nubians (called Medjy) served the pharaohs as traders and elite military forces. (Middle Kingdom models show them marching in precise rows bearing shields and bows or spears.) During the Late Period, Nubians traveled north, invading Luxor to reestablish classical Pharaonic culture." I think that perhaps you are confusing "Caucasian Genes" with Caucasian People!!! LOL! Alas Genetics is MUCH more complex than that my friend!! If you have ever seen a "Nubian" you would undoubtedly call them black, except they have "mostly caucasian genes" according to science and are distinct genetically from Africans. I think this is just another case that proves that Race is in the eye of the beholder, and really is meaningless. None the less Nubians were in Ancient Egypt....no history book doubts this. Nubians also have Cacasian genes. I think your mystery of the Caucasian Genes in Egypt has just been solved! LOL!



posted on Jan, 27 2011 @ 04:52 PM
link   
reply to post by orangetom1999
 


Just want to point out one more time my entire education up until masters was Jesuit. I went to Fordham which is a Jesuit university. My education was very good. I was taught I could question even my own faith. The big bang was discovered by a Jesuit priest as were many science based discoveries.

You question every educational aspect exept your bible. The king James bible is a paraphrase of the real wealth of religious texts. You seriously need to learn Greek, arahamiac, Hebrew, Persian, Arabic and Latin to really start becoming an expert or to even understand what you are talking about. Otherwise you are accepting state sponsored religion. You are naive if you think the bible itself isn't made to shadow over the real power of spiritual teaching. Christ wasn't an accident. The Essenes had been interbreeding spiritual hirearchy for centuries to create Jesus. It is no accident his blood comes from king David. The whole business of being born to poor people should be a red flag. His parents were esenes as was he.

The whole redemption for accepting Christ as lord and savior was created long after his death or the first bible (80 years after). Most people have zero understanding of the mysticism of the time. Sufis in that region today keep alive some of the mystical codes. Most Christians though have become unempowered by just accepting Jesus and not understanding the mystical revelations he found.



posted on Jan, 27 2011 @ 05:09 PM
link   
Some Caucasian tribe family names can be traced in Africa , Egypt and China .

Also , Hyksos tribe did have Caucasian element in it too .



Nebuchadnezzar's weapons were also built by the same Caucasian tribe .



posted on Jan, 27 2011 @ 07:36 PM
link   

Where do the primitive white cultures live?


france

the regions of the USA reffered to as " the bible belt "

slough [ a municiplality of the UK ]



posted on Jan, 27 2011 @ 07:50 PM
link   
Since this is in the conspiracy section, and having not read all 16 (?) pages of replies, i offer this (which is only what i have read) as a possible explanation (which i am not condoning but find interesting):

The dark skinned peoples were the true indigenous peoples of the earth, having come into existence through *true* evolution; the *white* skinned peoples, however, were the result of either ET genetic manipulation or a genetically modified *seed* planted (or created) by...ETs and put onto the earth, which is why the *primitives*--or indigenous peoples, tend to live "with" earth (having come directly from it), whereas the *whites* tend to live *against* nature, subduing and conquering it for their own ends. That actually kinda makes sense, when you think about it. Truly indigenous peoples--across the globe--when compared with *westerners,* or *whites*, live completely differently.

Strange, but just a thought, to consider.

?



posted on Jan, 28 2011 @ 03:53 AM
link   
reply to post by EssenSieMich
 


Wow......you posted a very interesting question, and people met it with nothing but racist hostility! Not to mention, totally ignoring the difference between people choosing to live that way, and cultures that are not advanced. Political slurs, too. Sheesh. Even comments against people in certain locations. Bigotry is alive and well.

The question itself is a good one. There aren't any such cultures today. Haven't been any for a long time. I would postulate that, for a multitude of reasons, that racial group advanced faster. Location, culture, whims of nature; too many factors to say for certain, but suspect that's the case. Would be a great study for someone, though. Will pass the question along to my history buff hubby, and see what he thinks.



posted on Jan, 28 2011 @ 04:00 AM
link   

Originally posted by EssenSieMich
reply to post by ThinkingCap
 


No I addressed that in the initial post. The Hill Billies were not always that way. At one point their ancestors were in fact first world members of civilization who chose to migrate into the hills. The hillbillies of today are the result of the civilized becoming uncivilized. They are not indigenous cultures that have for all time been primitive.


Add to what you stated, the hillbilly people are not "primitive", but simply, in most cases, poor. Seriously dirt poor, and utterly ignored by groups claiming to want to aid the poor of the world. I happen to be Southern, and am somewhat familiar with the type. Not the same thing at all that you are looking for. I think some people just can't resist putting someone down, even though you made every effort for this to not be that sort of post.



posted on Jan, 28 2011 @ 04:08 AM
link   

Originally posted by Nameless Hussy
[snip]

Anyways, I have a question. Why did Neanderthal man -- who lived mostly in what is now Europe and had red hair and white skin -- go extinct?

edit on 1/4/2011 by Nameless Hussy because: (no reason given)


I heard a really good theory on that some years back, that they later discarded for no good reason at all. The idea was, and there was good evidence to back it, the Neanderthals were bred into the other groups. Not really gone, just too diluted genetically to show up much. Actually knew a couple of people in my younger days that had some rather Neanderthal-type traits.



posted on Jan, 28 2011 @ 04:19 AM
link   

Originally posted by getreadyalready
reply to post by _Highlander_
 


What about Inuit? They were in the coldest climate with the least sun, and they are still brown enough to be "native" looking.

American Indians are also a native "white" culture, and they still exist on Reservations in the US.


Um......American Indians and Inuits are from Asian descent, not caucasian.



posted on Jan, 28 2011 @ 04:21 AM
link   

Originally posted by Syyth007
Most other "primitive" cultures are still primitive because of geographical isolation, along with a lack of available resources.

Oh this old chestnut... If it's not that, it's because the white invaders came and plundered their resources or sold them into slavery (like they weren't already doing it to themselves). Give me a break...
I suspect this topic has underlying racist motives. Whatever - I'll bite!
Plenty of African countries have abundant natural resources yet people still live in huts in tribal groups. It can only explained by genetics. Just take one country, Uganda. The Ugandan Asians are returning and they tend to be the entrepreneurs and business leaders. There is no love lost between black Ugandans and Asian Ugandans.
Here's a neat little story to illustrate the differences. I go into a shop in Kampala selling alcohol and ask for a business card (some friends operate a big safari business). Guy scratches head and disappears into the back, re-emerging a full 10 minutes later to say 'Sorry we have no cards' And that was it. WTF! Business card or no, most people with half of a brain (and certainly an Asian) would have thought about writing out some contact details. Says it all, really.....
My friends actually employ staff from other African countries because the locals are so hopeless. But of course it is 'racist', is it not, to acknowledge general differences between racial groups.
Which is why the Olympics will never be a level playing field. But that's a whole other topic methinks.
edit on 28-1-2011 by starchild10 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 28 2011 @ 04:24 AM
link   

Originally posted by NadaCambia

Originally posted by JohhnyBGood

I see that the idea of 'white guilt' has been firmly embedded as axiomatic in many of the respondants here - not at all surprising considering that the whole history writing and publishing business was hijacked and taken over early last century........


Really? Why don't you highlight these examples of white guilt, because oddly enough, nobody else sees it.


Are you serious? Look at the first several posts, the references to warmongers, hillbillies, Southerners, slavers, etc. We all see it, and it's appalling. Half the country is convinced that white people are responsible for all the woes of the world, and that's simply wrong. Altering history textsdoesn't actually change history.



posted on Jan, 28 2011 @ 04:27 AM
link   
Visit most of the council estates in the UK, there you shall find the answers you seek (Just park your car on the outskirts, don't carry valuables, and don't look the natives straight in the eyes, especially if they around 13-14 years of age and wear tracksuit or burberry)



posted on Jan, 28 2011 @ 04:29 AM
link   

Originally posted by Mr Headshot
[snip]
I'm Native American, I was raised in a highly Native American populated area. Do I begrudge white people for wholesale genocide of my ancestors? Not really. I mean, I have central heat and I don't follow buffalo around the plains on cold winter nights like tonight. I think that civilization is built upon the foundation of the people it has slaughtered. It happens. Doesn't make it right, but it happens.


Do you realize that calling American Indians, Amerinds, "Native Americans" is actually pretty racist and superior-sounding? I am Native American - I was born here, and so were my parents, their parents, etc. Using that term for a racial group isn't accurate. Happen to have a bit of what I call Indian blood (meaning American Indian), too, but that doesn't make me more or less "native American" than any other native of this nation.



posted on Jan, 28 2011 @ 04:59 AM
link   
A lot of posters are making a lot of jokes but i find this very question FASCINATING!! You learn something new everyday. Wow, just WOW!! I hope to have many interesting conversations when i bring this subject up.



posted on Jan, 28 2011 @ 05:11 AM
link   

Originally posted by gorrillaz
reply to post by EssenSieMich
 


lol heres the thing there are no primitive "white" races because and no offence ment but man was ment to be black whiteness is a defect in the genes and when we all split off from africa those who went north where there was less intense sunlight the pigment in their skin lightened then they decided to try taking over the world so to speak as they advanced through the ages


Based on your statement, you are saying that the race that composes only about 15% of the planet has somehow managed to take over? Would that not imply some superiority? I sense some illogical thinking in the reasoning here.....



posted on Jan, 28 2011 @ 06:07 AM
link   

Originally posted by Movescamp
reply to post by tom502
 

[snip]The other thing you are not aware of is neurological science. The brains of humans are all the same. The environment you are raised in however makes them brain physically develope differently. [snip]


Wrong. Scientific studies have shown that brains are not all the same, and intelligence is in fact hereditary. You can deny that all day long, but that doesn't make you correct, and years of studies incorrect. It isn't racist to point out that there are differences in the races, any more than it's sexist to point out the fact that there are differences between men and women. We are not all the same. That doesn't imply some superiority, and in fact the OP was careful to state that it was not his intention to make any racial judgments. Another poster pointing out that differences in the races could contribute to different developments isn't racist at all.

I think what's happened is that you have been exposed to some very politically-correct teaching, and are now unable to see that teaching for what it actually is, which is propaganda. We don't have to all be the same to be alright with each other. The world would be very dull, in fact, if we were all the same. Just as men and women have different strengths and weaknesses, so do different races. Studying and discussing such things is scientific, not insulting or racist.



posted on Jan, 28 2011 @ 06:11 AM
link   

Originally posted by Movescamp
[i[snip]
Einstein was of Jewish decent.

Tesla did not Go to college in the us. He went to school in Prague (which is in eastern Europe)
[snip]


Jewish people are, as far as race is concerned, white. Tesla was also white. Since when did this become a discussion of the United States vs the rest of the world? The topic is primitive cultures, not modern politics.



posted on Jan, 28 2011 @ 06:17 AM
link   

Originally posted by PublikOUTLAW
no offense to anyone but from my studies "white men or the pale skinned" were made by genetics in the past civilization by YAKUB(look it up) all other races are the original MAN and WOMB-MAN. the "whites" or pale skinned or w/e u wanna call them(elite) were cast out of the holly land to the rocks and caves of euoropa, were they were cast on the left side of their brains.. so u see they come from cave men not all the other races..so they were the last to do anything!!!!! last to travel last to build last to do everything!!! put it all 2gether yall


"Studies?" I don't need to look up your terminology because I already happen to be very knowledgeable on such matters. What this poster is attempting to claim is that sitting in front of an Islamic cleric who knows nothing about the world beyond Islamic writings and the speeches passed to him from other local Islamic writers makes him/her a scholar in all things involving anthropology, history, history, archaeology, philosophy and world religions.

The Islamic Pride movement teaches its adherents that all great achievements came from the cradle of civilization and that civilization was created by their god and that he created them in Northern African regions. The facts of history elude them. The separate cradles of civilization elude them. The great civilizations outside Egypt and Nubia are unknown to them. To their knowledge, their was no civilization earlier than their own or outside of their own. They have no knowledge of the lost civilizations of the Mediterranean or even of the Greek claims of Egyptian scholars teaching them of their own lost histories. While ancient Egypt predates almost all other civilizations, it does not predate all settlements.

From a religious perspective, in support of the poster, I must admit, in a slightly more eloquent fashion however . . . the Judeo Christian perspective agrees. The Holy Land lies centered around the Tigris-Euphrates river basins, in Jerusalem and downwards to the Nile. Mankind was dispersed throughout the world from that region. Topography and geological evidence supports what religion tells us, though men calling themselves scientists attempt to claim otherwise.



new topics

top topics



 
24
<< 13  14  15    17 >>

log in

join