It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SaturnFX
knuckle dragging cavemen whom cannot comprehend statistics
Originally posted by Whereweheaded
reply to post by mythos
Actually Im none of the above? And you claim judgmental, and label me! BWAAHAHA!! Aint that the pot callin the kettle black? You make assumptions, establishing labels, on what proof? None....wanna talk about the the true nature of the liberals, look no further~
Originally posted by BigTimeCheater
reply to post by SaturnFX
Who would be doing the "allowing"?
If education were a matter of national security, the U.S. wouldve been dead long ago.
Originally posted by Whereweheaded
reply to post by SaturnFX
Where in the Constitution does it say the Fed's have the power to subject children to specific learning curves and or specific subject based material?
Originally posted by SaturnFX
She is dying...which is probably no concidence why we are also starting to disarm.
Originally posted by SaturnFX
I have never been to a federal school, I have been to state schools. how about you?
Originally posted by SaturnFX
I think your right though
I think the new conservative movement should run on a platform of eliminating education and being pro-obesity.
I will help you make picket signs
Originally posted by zuul000
Originally posted by SaturnFX
I think your right though
I think the new conservative movement should run on a platform of eliminating education and being pro-obesity.
I will help you make picket signs
When you do that will you exhibit a better command of the English language than you have to date? Just curious.
Originally posted by SaturnFX
Originally posted by zuul000
Originally posted by SaturnFX
I think your right though
I think the new conservative movement should run on a platform of eliminating education and being pro-obesity.
I will help you make picket signs
When you do that will you exhibit a better command of the English language than you have to date? Just curious.
When you do that COMMA will you exhibit a better command of the english language than you have to date? I am curious. (added some words to your incomplete statement)
so...lets see, forgot a comma, capped a letter that wasn't supposed to be capped, and followed it with a incomplete sentence. I would venture to say my use of whom incorrectly is mild in comparison to my critic
Now, care to rejoin the topic, or is being a troll the only trick you know?
Originally posted by zuul000
Originally posted by SaturnFX
Originally posted by zuul000
Originally posted by SaturnFX
I think your right though
I think the new conservative movement should run on a platform of eliminating education and being pro-obesity.
I will help you make picket signs
When you do that will you exhibit a better command of the English language than you have to date? Just curious.
When you do that COMMA will you exhibit a better command of the english language than you have to date? I am curious. (added some words to your incomplete statement)
so...lets see, forgot a comma, capped a letter that wasn't supposed to be capped, and followed it with a incomplete sentence. I would venture to say my use of whom incorrectly is mild in comparison to my critic
Now, care to rejoin the topic, or is being a troll the only trick you know?
I'm not sure what they taught you at the land grant university you attended but there is no "COMMA" [sic] after "that" and "just curious" is a colloquially acceptable simple sentence.
However ...
so...lets see, forgot a comma, capped a letter that wasn't supposed to be capped, and followed it with a incomplete sentence. I would venture to say my use of whom incorrectly is mild in comparison to my critic
The word "lets" [sic] should be conjugated, you should capitalize "S", you incorrectly used an ellipses, and there should be a period after "critic."
Best of luck with all your endeavors in life,
Z
Use a comma + a little conjunction (and, but, for, nor, yet, or, so) to connect two independent clauses, as in "He hit the ball well, but he ran toward third base."
Originally posted by SaturnFX
Originally posted by zuul000
Originally posted by SaturnFX
Originally posted by zuul000
Originally posted by SaturnFX
I think your right though
I think the new conservative movement should run on a platform of eliminating education and being pro-obesity.
I will help you make picket signs
When you do that will you exhibit a better command of the English language than you have to date? Just curious.
When you do that COMMA will you exhibit a better command of the english language than you have to date? I am curious. (added some words to your incomplete statement)
so...lets see, forgot a comma, capped a letter that wasn't supposed to be capped, and followed it with a incomplete sentence. I would venture to say my use of whom incorrectly is mild in comparison to my critic
Now, care to rejoin the topic, or is being a troll the only trick you know?
I'm not sure what they taught you at the land grant university you attended but there is no "COMMA" [sic] after "that" and "just curious" is a colloquially acceptable simple sentence.
However ...
so...lets see, forgot a comma, capped a letter that wasn't supposed to be capped, and followed it with a incomplete sentence. I would venture to say my use of whom incorrectly is mild in comparison to my critic
The word "lets" [sic] should be conjugated, you should capitalize "S", you incorrectly used an ellipses, and there should be a period after "critic."
Best of luck with all your endeavors in life,
Z
These posts will be removed for off topic
But yes...there is supposed to be a comma after your word that. You used that as a subject matter and created two independent clauses. To not have a comma there would create a run-on sentence which is poor grammar
Originally posted by mythos
surely we are all not anarchists and believe that NO government is a healthy way for a society of 350 million people to carry on?
Originally posted by mythos
PS typos and grammatical errors occur. it happens. we all try to manage (some more than others) the lexicon of letters, but, you know... sh!t happens.
Originally posted by mythos
reply to post by zuul000
whilst i appreciate your grammatical enthusiasm, i consider Saturn FX to be a solid contributor to the ATS world, and have often appreciated his/her perspective (even when i have not agreed with it).
perhaps you are an old character returned with a new name, but it seems you have been on ATS for a few days now. surely there is more you can contribute, because if cleaning up grammatical errors is to be your thing, you will find yourself VERY busy in ATS, and yet contributing very little.
welcome.
and do be kind to whatever errors i too have made. i consider myself an artist and a seeker before i am a scholar.
cheers
edit on 3-1-2011 by mythos because: typo- oh, the irony
Originally posted by zuul000(1) These posts are not off-topic. You indicated, earlier, conservatives were "idiots" so an examination of your rather shaky command of written English becomes both pertinent and topical.