It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Quake Watch 2011

page: 160
203
<< 157  158  159    161  162  163 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 9 2011 @ 04:33 PM
link   
reply to post by BobAthome
 


Yeah I could maybe create my own wiggles and put them on a chart as an image

I'm half way there with the timeline graph I do now using coloured dots
I'll have a go

I have the data on csv Excel file already (used for the maps)

example




posted on Jul, 9 2011 @ 04:41 PM
link   
Another big aftershock 2hrs ago at the Kermadecs, 5.7 Mw ....................... (5.5mb on the phase data)
earthquake.usgs.gov...
So why aren't the other 5.5mb' quakes converted inti Mw too?

Looks like selective data manipulation on the USGS Last 7 Days list, to make things look worse than they really are.
If they were all in mb it would be a flat band of aftershocks between 4.7 and 5.6

edit on 9-7-2011 by muzzy because: 2 add link



posted on Jul, 9 2011 @ 05:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by muzzy
reply to post by PuterMan
 

Yes I think I have seen negative magnitudes before, was it the Iceland site?


Yes it was, heres an example

Date Time Latitude Longitude Depth Magnitude Quality Location
Saturday
09.07.2011 14:32:48 63.605 -19.133 1.7 km -0.1 99.0 3.2 km NNW of Hábunga

en.vedur.is...=table


Also on NORSAR, the Norweign Seismic Array lists
heres an example , negative magnitudes are quite common, look for the "Netmag"


NEW FRIESLAND SVALBARD
Origin time Lat Lon Azres Timres Wres Nphase Ntot Nsta Netmag
2011-190:04.29.00.0 78.57 18.12 9.43 0.37 2.73 2 4 1 -0.08

www.norsardata.no...-190:08.58.47.0

heres where you get the lists, they are numbered from 1-365, today is day 190 UTC
www.norsardata.no...


these guys are so precise I wouldn't be surprised if the negitive ones weren't Whale Burps

edit on 9-7-2011 by muzzy because: fix ex tags



posted on Jul, 9 2011 @ 05:36 PM
link   
reply to post by muzzy
 


ahhhhh punch cards
lol thats a lot of holes



posted on Jul, 9 2011 @ 05:39 PM
link   
reply to post by muzzy
 


You know it might indicate stress build up,,not stress release,, kind of a "potential energy" wave.Being in the negative that is.


Me Guessing.



posted on Jul, 9 2011 @ 08:14 PM
link   
Big bump off Japan. Somebody was talking about the region off New Zealand as being busy. I was noticing that as well, and was expecting something there, not Japan. No tsunami warning I think.



posted on Jul, 9 2011 @ 08:18 PM
link   
reply to post by Robin Marks
 


7.0 off Japan east coast trying to find more

Be back.

Edit:

Source:
earthquake.usgs.gov...

Magnitude
7.0
Date-Time
Sunday, July 10, 2011 at 00:57:12 UTC
Sunday, July 10, 2011 at 10:57:12 AM at epicenter
Location
38.040°N, 143.287°E
Depth
34.9 km (21.7 miles)
Region
OFF THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN
Distances
212 km (131 miles) E (96°) from Sendai, Honshu, Japan
237 km (147 miles) ENE (62°) from Iwaki, Honshu, Japan
250 km (155 miles) E (81°) from Fukushima, Honshu, Japan
411 km (255 miles) NE (49°) from TOKYO, Japan
Location Uncertainty
horizontal +/- 14.1 km (8.8 miles); depth +/- 4.2 km (2.6 miles)
Parameters
NST=310, Nph=311, Dmin=441.9 km, Rmss=0.8 sec, Gp= 32°,
M-type=regional moment magnitude (Mw), Version=9
Source
U.S. Geological Survey, National Earthquake Information Center:
World Data Center for Seismology, Denver
Event ID
usc0004sg6

Regards and Nameste,

-Chung

edit on 9-7-2011 by ChungTsuU because: (no reason given)

edit on 9-7-2011 by ChungTsuU because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 9 2011 @ 09:03 PM
link   
reply to post by muzzy
 


Yes they are a regular feature on the Icelandic lists.

Negative magnitudes are still quite substantial!
(as a meal?)




edit on 9/7/2011 by PuterMan because: To be silly OK?



posted on Jul, 9 2011 @ 09:03 PM
link   
We have 3 or 4 threads started on the
Japan quake. There is a tsunami warning
and the Fukushima plant has been evacuated.
Hope for the people of Japan!



posted on Jul, 9 2011 @ 09:04 PM
link   
reply to post by ChungTsuU
 


Let us compare

MARCH 9, 2011


Magnitude
7.2
Date-Time
Wednesday, March 09, 2011 at 02:45:20 UTC
Wednesday, March 09, 2011 at 11:45:20 AM at epicenter
Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones
Location
38.424°N, 142.836°E
Depth
32 km (19.9 miles) set by location program
Region
NEAR THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN
Distances
168 km (104 miles) E of Sendai, Honshu, Japan
193 km (119 miles) SE of Morioka, Honshu, Japan
216 km (134 miles) E of Yamagata, Honshu, Japan
413 km (256 miles) NE of TOKYO, Japan
Location Uncertainty
horizontal +/- 3.1 km (1.9 miles); depth fixed by location program
Parameters
NST=494, Nph=494, Dmin=400.2 km, Rmss=0.98 sec, Gp= 29°,
M-type=teleseismic moment magnitude (Mw), Version=B
Source
USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)
Event ID
usb0001r57




Magnitude
7.0
Date-Time
Sunday, July 10, 2011 at 00:57:12 UTC
Sunday, July 10, 2011 at 10:57:12 AM at epicenter
Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones
Location
38.040°N, 143.287°E
Depth
34.9 km (21.7 miles)
Region
OFF THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN
Distances
212 km (131 miles) E of Sendai, Honshu, Japan
239 km (148 miles) ENE of Iwaki, Honshu, Japan
250 km (155 miles) E of Fukushima, Honshu, Japan
409 km (254 miles) NE of TOKYO, Japan
Location Uncertainty
horizontal +/- 14.1 km (8.8 miles); depth +/- 4.2 km (2.6 miles)
Parameters
NST=310, Nph=311, Dmin=441.9 km, Rmss=0.8 sec, Gp= 32°,
M-type=regional moment magnitude (Mw), Version=9
Source
USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)
Event ID
usc0004sg6

edit on 9-7-2011 by berkeleygal because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 9 2011 @ 09:17 PM
link   
reply to post by berkeleygal
 


If you are suggesting what I think you are suggesting then you should not be suggesting what I think you are suggesting. Just suggesting!



After three weeks of being without my program, my graphing and earthquake lists etc I FINALLY got it all back and working today and the first run I see the 7.0 - a big red blob!

Not wholly unexpected however. Has anyone accessed the Japan Met Office tsunami bulletin yet?


edit on 9/7/2011 by PuterMan because: 'Cos I am a grumpy old git and make spelling errors, OK?


www.jma.go.jp...

Tsunami Warning/Advisory

Issued at 10:00 JST 10 Jul 2011

******************Headline******************
Tsunami Advisories have been issued for the following coastal regions of Japan:
PACIFIC COAST OF TOHOKU
*******************Text********************
Tsunami Advisories have been issued for the following coastal regions of Japan:

IWATE PREF.
MIYAGI PREF.
FUKUSHIMA PREF.

***********About Tsunami Forecast************

Tsunami height is expected to be about 0.5 meters. Attention advised.

******* Earthquake Information ********
Occurred at 09:57 JST 10 Jul 2011
Region name SANRIKU OKI
Latitude 38.0N
Longitude 143.5E
Depth about 10 km
Magnitude 7.1


edit on 9/7/2011 by PuterMan because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 9 2011 @ 09:25 PM
link   
reply to post by PuterMan
 


Ha! We'll see in a few days if what I wasn't suggesting happens.

I got a bad feeling.



posted on Jul, 9 2011 @ 09:43 PM
link   
reply to post by berkeleygal
 



Ha! We'll see in a few days if what I wasn't suggesting happens.

I got a bad feeling.


That is a song title isn't it? It won't happen. It has never happened before in recorded earthquake history and I see no reason why it should happen now.

As I have stated before a 7 to 7.5 was on the cards but and 8 or greater was not UNLESS Japan was not going to run to the 'norm' (if there is such a thing) whereby very large quakes only follow very large quakes in Indonesia and Alaska, and usually not within less than a one year period.

To get a 9 so soon after a 9 would be like winning the Euromillions! (Lottery) 116,531,800 to 1



posted on Jul, 9 2011 @ 09:48 PM
link   
Meteorologists warned of a possible tsunami of around 50cm (20in). But NHK reported an actual height of just 10cm (4in) for the surge.

There were no immediate reports of injuries or damage, according to NHK.


www.bbc.co.uk...

TBH, was this mag really a surprise in the aftershock sequence?

JMA have now cancelled all tsunami warnings:

www.jma.go.jp...
edit on 9-7-2011 by MoorfNZ because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 9 2011 @ 10:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by berkeleygal
reply to post by ChungTsuU
 


Let us compare

MARCH 9, 2011


Magnitude
7.2
Date-Time
Wednesday, March 09, 2011 at 02:45:20 UTC
Wednesday, March 09, 2011 at 11:45:20 AM at epicenter
Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones
Location
38.424°N, 142.836°E
Depth
32 km (19.9 miles) set by location program
Region
NEAR THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN
Distances
168 km (104 miles) E of Sendai, Honshu, Japan
193 km (119 miles) SE of Morioka, Honshu, Japan
216 km (134 miles) E of Yamagata, Honshu, Japan
413 km (256 miles) NE of TOKYO, Japan
Location Uncertainty
horizontal +/- 3.1 km (1.9 miles); depth fixed by location program
Parameters
NST=494, Nph=494, Dmin=400.2 km, Rmss=0.98 sec, Gp= 29°,
M-type=teleseismic moment magnitude (Mw), Version=B
Source
USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)
Event ID
usb0001r57




Magnitude
7.0
Date-Time
Sunday, July 10, 2011 at 00:57:12 UTC
Sunday, July 10, 2011 at 10:57:12 AM at epicenter
Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones
Location
38.040°N, 143.287°E
Depth
34.9 km (21.7 miles)
Region
OFF THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN
Distances
212 km (131 miles) E of Sendai, Honshu, Japan
239 km (148 miles) ENE of Iwaki, Honshu, Japan
250 km (155 miles) E of Fukushima, Honshu, Japan
409 km (254 miles) NE of TOKYO, Japan
Location Uncertainty
horizontal +/- 14.1 km (8.8 miles); depth +/- 4.2 km (2.6 miles)
Parameters
NST=310, Nph=311, Dmin=441.9 km, Rmss=0.8 sec, Gp= 32°,
M-type=regional moment magnitude (Mw), Version=9
Source
USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)
Event ID
usc0004sg6

edit on 9-7-2011 by berkeleygal because: (no reason given)


And dont forget:

At 9:46 PM Pacific Standard Time on March 10, an earthquake with preliminary magnitude 7.9 occurred near the east coast of Honshu, Japan . (Refer to the United States Geological Survey for official earthquake parameters.)
IF TSUNAMI WAVES IMPACT HAWAII THE ESTIMATED EARLIEST ARRIVAL OF
THE FIRST TSUNAMI WAVE IS
0259 AM HST FRI 11 MAR 2011
MESSAGES WILL BE ISSUED HOURLY OR SOONER AS CONDITIONS WARRANT.



posted on Jul, 9 2011 @ 10:11 PM
link   
reply to post by BobAthome
 

Thanks for the comparison. I see the depth of both
quakes are close to the same. I certainly hope they
are not in for a bigger quake this time around.



posted on Jul, 9 2011 @ 10:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by PuterMan
reply to post by berkeleygal
 



Ha! We'll see in a few days if what I wasn't suggesting happens.

I got a bad feeling.


That is a song title isn't it? It won't happen. It has never happened before in recorded earthquake history and I see no reason why it should happen now.

As I have stated before a 7 to 7.5 was on the cards but and 8 or greater was not UNLESS Japan was not going to run to the 'norm' (if there is such a thing) whereby very large quakes only follow very large quakes in Indonesia and Alaska, and usually not within less than a one year period.

To get a 9 so soon after a 9 would be like winning the Euromillions! (Lottery) 116,531,800 to 1


I could be wrong but I don't believe there have ever been two 9.0+ mag quakes in the same year in recorded history, let alone a few months apart.

So if that were to happen in Japan, or anywhere else it will certainly add plenty of fuel to the 2012 and other doomsday prophecies.

Also if Japan were to get rocked yet again and 'sink into the ocean' like many psychics (i.e. Edgar Cayce) claim will happen that will be the last sign I need to personally see we are truly living in the end times.



posted on Jul, 9 2011 @ 11:45 PM
link   
TOYKO 4.7 mag quake

earthquake.usgs.gov...


MAG 4.7

2011/07/10

04:18:18

36.068 140.067 MAP

19.4 DEPTH(kms)

NEAR THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN



posted on Jul, 10 2011 @ 12:01 AM
link   

Originally posted by shaneR
TOYKO 4.7 mag quake

earthquake.usgs.gov...


MAG 4.7

2011/07/10

04:18:18

36.068 140.067 MAP

19.4 DEPTH(kms)

NEAR THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN


Wow just saw this pop up on the android app too.

This is directly under the land mass underneath Toyko, pretty shallow too so it's not likely an aftershock from the earlier 7.0 quake that was in the ocean.

Stay tuned.,....



posted on Jul, 10 2011 @ 01:27 AM
link   
I see that the Russians are quite high on their reading for the o/s Honshu quake
7.3Ms and 7.1mb

USGS are only 6.8mb
Geofon 6.9Mw
EMSC 7.1Mw

if it wasn't for the Russians I think this one was likely for a downgrade below 7.0



new topics

top topics



 
203
<< 157  158  159    161  162  163 >>

log in

join