It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Quake Watch 2011

page: 158
203
<< 155  156  157    159  160  161 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 8 2011 @ 01:39 AM
link   
reply to post by freetree64
 

It's a wait, watch and see what happens next......


I should be sleeping, been having a difficult time falling asleep the past couple nights. So I have nothing to do but watch




posted on Jul, 8 2011 @ 04:56 AM
link   

Originally posted by westcoast to whom this venom is NOT directed
Hey guys....just want to make sure you all see this article. (thanks to ATS member buni11687 for their thread on it)

New force driving earth's tectonic plates


Disclaimer: This is not a dig at you westcoast so please do not take it personally.


Bringing fresh insight into long-standing debates about how powerful geological forces shape the planet, from earthquake ruptures to mountain formations, scientists at Scripps Institution of Oceanography at UC San Diego have identified a new mechanism driving Earth's massive tectonic plates.


Passing this through the translator I get:

We have come up with a new scam for getting funding by repeating stuff that has already been said.


Scripps scientists Steve Cande and Dave Stegman have now discovered a new force that drives plate tectonics: Plumes of hot magma pushing up from Earth's deep interior.


We were asleep in the lecture when this was mentioned so it is completely new to us, and we just discovered it.


Using analytical methods to track plate motions through Earth's history


We did the usual guessing game since that is what scientists do. There is no actual evidence so we have to pretend there is.


The arrival of the plume also created immense formations of volcanic rock now called the "Deccan flood basalts" in western India, which erupted just prior to the mass extinction of dinosaurs.


Oh so it was not Chixelub then?

Sorry but this is just rehashed BS to continue putting food on the table.

All of this was postulated in a 2006 report

There is little to recommend the practice of theft.


edit on 8/7/2011 by PuterMan because: To add disclaimer



posted on Jul, 8 2011 @ 11:40 AM
link   
Question?? Did anyone else see the USGS map this morning?? I almost hit the floor when I first opened it. The circle on the map, off the east coast of the US and Canada was so BIG, so I scrolled down the map and it showed the same huge circle. I then looked at the mag and it said -0.3
What the hell does that mean? Did anyone else see it?? I don't know how to take a snap shot - I wish I did!!


Thursday July 7 2011, 23:27:54 UTC 16 hours ago Canada -0.3 0.0 Detail

I wish the size of the circle would show up on here for me. I really hope I was not the only one to see this...



posted on Jul, 8 2011 @ 11:43 AM
link   
reply to post by summer5
 


The image and link were posted in another thread. You can find it in this thread.

Weird!

Be Well.



posted on Jul, 8 2011 @ 11:45 AM
link   
reply to post by Bishop2199
 

At least I was not the only one to have seen it - Thanks Bishop!



posted on Jul, 8 2011 @ 11:45 AM
link   
reply to post by summer5
 


Saw that too. But if it were that big, I think the world would be ringing like a bell right now.



posted on Jul, 8 2011 @ 11:50 AM
link   
reply to post by summer5
 


Perhaps we should all scream 'Government Cover-up!'


Just kidding.

Be Well.



posted on Jul, 8 2011 @ 11:52 AM
link   

Originally posted by SunnyDee
reply to post by summer5
 


Saw that too. But if it were that big, I think the world would be ringing like a bell right now.


No kidding! I think the entire east coast, and then some, would be obliviated!



posted on Jul, 8 2011 @ 12:00 PM
link   
I was scanning across the northern US and saw a couple of eq's in Montana. I know they have been having a lot of flooding going on and was wondering if eq's of this size and depth were unusual for this location.


Magnitude
3.5
Date-Time
Friday, July 01, 2011 at 22:03:06 UTC
Friday, July 01, 2011 at 04:03:06 PM at epicenter
Location
48.105°N, 108.311°W
Depth
5.4 km

Magnitude
2.7
Date-Time
Monday, July 04, 2011 at 06:11:36 UTC
Monday, July 04, 2011 at 12:11:36 AM at epicenter
Location
47.353°N, 114.068°W
Depth
3.6 km (2.2 miles)


Any intelligent feedback about this area is greatly appreciated.

Be Well



posted on Jul, 8 2011 @ 03:37 PM
link   
reply to post by Bishop2199
 


Here ya go - if you accept this as intelligent information


Montana

Earthquake History
Montana is one of the most seismically active States in the Union. Since 1925, the State has experienced five shocks that reached intensity VIII or greater (Modified Mercalli Scale). During the same interval hundreds of less severe tremors were felt within the State. Montana's earthquake activity is concentrated mostly in the mountainous western third of the State which lies within a seismic zone that also includes southeastern Idaho, western Wyoming, and central Utah.


More on the History



posted on Jul, 8 2011 @ 05:12 PM
link   
reply to post by PuterMan
 


No offense taken PM...


Always good to get your opinion. I was thinking it was kinda a no-brainer...so this HAS been discussed before. Makes sense.

As to the mega quake on the East Coast...
Glad you are all still alive.



posted on Jul, 8 2011 @ 05:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by PuterMan
reply to post by muzzy
 

Or was it this

www.iris.edu...



OK so where did you get that one from

the only difference in the page address from the one I posted is

_s0.0002.png
at the end.
Mine www.iris.edu...

Am i coming in through the wrong page?
www.iris.edu...

Yours looks more like what they had on LISS.



posted on Jul, 8 2011 @ 05:34 PM
link   
Well New Hampshire just had a 2.6, but I wouldn't classify that as being an east coast "big one" !


MAP 2.6 2011/07/08 21:09:20 44.088 -72.036 11.0 NEW HAMPSHIRE:

earthquake.usgs.gov...



posted on Jul, 8 2011 @ 05:35 PM
link   
another strangely placed quake, no info under Maps at USGS


Magnitude
2.6
Date-Time
Friday, July 08, 2011 at 21:09:19 UTC
Friday, July 08, 2011 at 05:09:19 PM at epicenter
Location
44.088°N, 72.036°W
Depth
11 km (6.8 miles)
Region
NEW HAMPSHIRE
Distances
2 km (1 miles) ENE (66°) from Newbury, VT
6 km (4 miles) S (184°) from Woodsville, NH
7 km (5 miles) S (169°) from Wells River, VT
131 km (82 miles) NNW (339°) from Manchester, NH
200 km (124 miles) SE (142°) from Montr�al, Qu�bec, Canada
Location Uncertainty
horizontal +/- 0.6 km (0.4 miles); depth +/- 1 km (0.6 miles)
Parameters
NST= 12, Nph= 23, Dmin=47 km, Rmss=0.32 sec, Gp= 79°,
M-type="Nuttli" surface wave magnitude (mbLg), Version=a
Source
New England Seismic Network (NESN):
Weston Observatory of Boston College
Event ID
ne00001271


earthquake.usgs.gov...



posted on Jul, 8 2011 @ 06:32 PM
link   
reply to post by berkeleygal
 


Probably all the shaking in the New Zealand area. If you antipode the NH area, you come out to that area. I been doing some research on the antipodal maps



posted on Jul, 8 2011 @ 06:37 PM
link   
Puterman, we're all waiting for your explanation for that -.3 mega quake off the east coast of canada this am.....you're the only one we're gonna believe



posted on Jul, 8 2011 @ 07:06 PM
link   
reply to post by megabogie
 


I just checked and the depth of the "oddity" has been changed from when I saved a screenshot this morning.
quakes.globalincidentmap.com...

it`s now listed as 178km deep.



posted on Jul, 8 2011 @ 07:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by dragonlover12
reply to post by megabogie
 


I just checked and the depth of the "oddity" has been changed from when I saved a screenshot this morning.
quakes.globalincidentmap.com...

it`s now listed as 178km deep.


I just noticed that same thing a couple hours ago myself...very strange indeed.



posted on Jul, 8 2011 @ 07:15 PM
link   
reply to post by dragonlover12
 


there doesn't seem to be anything normal about it..I am surprised USGS hasn't explained anything about it or at least taken it off the screen



posted on Jul, 8 2011 @ 07:19 PM
link   
reply to post by megabogie
 


Kinda worries me that the depth was changed. Don`t they do that if its been reviewed by a seismologist and the depth has been determined?

Don`t have any idea what is going on with the info .

Can`t wait to get answers on this one !



new topics

top topics



 
203
<< 155  156  157    159  160  161 >>

log in

join