posted on Dec, 8 2010 @ 01:35 PM
Dear Unity Emissions, and to others reading,
Unity E. wrote, in part:
Listen, I'll leave you to your fairy world, but seriously... you've got issues.
Here I'll give you just one thing to contemplate. Logic. .. it's the application of reason. You can't sanely and honestly tell me that anything
spiritual can be applied with sound reason. Logic & Spirit are entirely incompatible. That's why I'm so sickened by religion, and people who claim
to know spiritual things. It's madness. You can't know these things. You believe. Don't mix up the two. That's dangerous!
Answer: You exhibit a bias about religion and spirit to the point of a neurosis. How then might you defend your view when feeling this way? I much
prefer to deal with people who have reasonable doubts about their own positions. It is they who can have a good discussion without calling someone
names like “crazy”. That is what you are attempting to do under the flag of a medic. No one is a patient until they have been harmed, and spirit
never harms.
To those others reading along, doubting the existence of the Thought Adjuster comes from never having it taught before, but that omission should not
be the reason to automatically disregard the obvious. Something is at work within us to open us up. Right now there are few human teachers to speak
to the Thought Adjuster spirit which has individualized itself within each of us. That will change even in our life times.
I have related my own experiences with the indwelling. My Thought Adjuster is active and is a wise component of my mental consciousness. The Thought
Adjuster does not get in the way of my thinking, but he does comment upon my process of thinking. I also know a few hundred other individuals who have
broken through and can dialog with this mental marvel. I have asked one of these individuals to send me his record that he wrote down during a
discussion with the Thought Adjuster and I have permission to publish a portion of it for your edification. There are many records, hundreds
more.
A Thought Adjuster conversation recently transcribed:
Inner Voice: Hello, I would accept this offer, this invitation to utilize this voice . . . . I am the one who has been invited to speak at this
time, this one's Inner Voice but I am known by many, many names and names are not at all important to me. What is important to me is that I am
recognized . . . . I am that flush of conviction, I am that sense of certainty, I am that piece of mind that comes from the knowing of spiritual
certainty.
These are the things that I bring to our relationship, yours and mine, for I speak for all voices. It is my pleasure and it is my desire to be ever
ready to join together with you as you are inclined to come together with me. Whenever you will provide the opportunity you can be assured I will be
there to meet you. It is not my custom to arrest your attention and to somehow stop you in your tracks to gain access to your focus. I am a recessive
partner in that I will always await your decision to seek me and to come together as one.
This is by design. You are ultimately a free will creature who has control of all of your destiny, literally all that happens to you is a result of
your intention, your focus, your purpose, your desires, your choices. Your combination of personality intertwining with all of these is responsible
for exactly who you are at any moment in time and space, even in eternity. . . .
You [are] the one that decides which doors to open, which doors to close, how quickly you proceed or how slowly are all determined solely by you in
the final analysis. I may be helpful, many factors in your life may be useful, but in the end it is you who will pick up these things or will lay them
down, who will choose them or forsake them, who will add them to your experiential base or will decline the opportunity.
And so it is quite true that our journey rests with your decision. I certainly am unable to proceed without you as I have attached myself to you with
the ultimate purpose and goal of combining with you, to be as one . . . .