I can't say this is hard proof, but read this, and draw you own conclusion:
It is unthinkable that so many prominent global MSM provide exposure to information that U.S. interests would actually harm. The MSM is in
fact completely controlled by the powers that be: that is something that even scientists worldwide recognise. Look how far the prominently New York
Times brings this 'big news': Watergate, there was nothing!
And how is the "Wikileaks-clique" of the worlds most 'authoritative' newspapers: NYT, Der Spiegel, The Guardian established?
The timing is alarming: just when the world is facing total crisis and speculation from all sides in wars (Iran, Korea), suddenly these
hyper-sensitive "documents go exactly on key foreign issues.
The Wikileaks documents, including those of the previous class, are in no way a real danger to the U.S. but rather just provide arguments
for starting wars against Iran and now Pakistan in particular.
Julian Assange himself has at no time an opponent in war.
Striking is the absence of damaging information about Israel.
Julian Assange believes that 9-11 was not a conspiracy, and thus supports more or less the official reading. This is an untenable position.
Assange even believes Osama Bin Laden as a mega-terrorist and documents "leaked" that he is still alive and is leading Al Qaeda."
These positions Assange are directly in line with those of the U.S.. He also makes no mention about Bilderberg, Trilateral Commission and Council on
Foreign Relations, the really interesting and important fora in which global politics is shaped.
Assange personal history is very poorly documented and includes many disturbing details. He would have wandered through the world with his
parents, went to 37 schools, things like that. This makes it virtually impossible to check things from his past. This provides foundation for a sort
of secret agent.
The ludicrous "counter-information 'as if Assange in Sweden' raped women seems intended to give him credibility as: who is haunted by power,
must have the power to disseminate information into disrepute .
The site is a mess, you can not even type in keywords.
The number of leaked documents is always great so absurd that there can be no question of the 'classical' method of leakage of some sensitive
documents. If someone wants to leak documents, he does it to draw attention to specific information. Then you never leak hundreds of thousands of
documents, but only those documents that deal with the matter in question. Moreover, the "leak" already announced in advance all the appearance of an
What is the business model of Wikileaks? We see no ads. Assange How does he earn money for all those women to rape and to travel around the
Google and Facebook are also intelligence operations from the CIA, as became known this summer. That makes it logical and believable that
Wikileaks a CIA invention.
(Sorry for the poor translation, it was written in Dutch..)
edit on 6-12-2010 by Amsterdam because: I tried to fix the faulty
translation, where I was able to..