Just more unfounded speculations, please I wanted some kind of evidence....
And sadly, the best I got so far is that George Soros is financing wikileaks, maybe..... But it's at least something that is somewhat likely, however, then what has George Soros to do with "NWO"? (EVIDENCE Boon?)

I am scratching my head over that too. How anyone can claim to be seeking the truth yet be outraged over someone finally leaking the truth is beyond me. Unless of course, the truth they are seeking is predefined in their minds and anything that doesn't match their version the truth is labeled as propaganda meant to lead away from what they believe is the real truth.

It sort of reminds of the whole religious thing where anything that doesn't match the biblical truth is labeled as something planted by the devil.

Your right there is no hard evidence he is plant but his actions are speaking volumes of suspicion. What you are forgetting is there is also no hard evidence he is what he claims to be either; a whistle blower/freedom fighter

The suspicious parts are that none of the information released was really secret we all knew it all ready. Supposedly they could not find Assange until conveniently they are trying to lock down the internet and of course they are locking down military bases and colleges from the information, a convenient prelude to full information lock-down and control.

So these people with the greatest assets in the world who assassinate whom ever they want can't find a two bit whistle blower and whack him and make him go away ... Yeah right. And then Hillary gets on TV and makes a big deal out of it and gives the story even more legs when all they had to do was deny it all and paint him as a crazy whacko and never mention it again. The already control the MSM if they were really ambarrased about this stuff why would they give this story any air time? They have an agenda and Assange is a player either as a pawn or thier operative, which one does not matter.

Now he is dangling the carrot saying the real stuff he has he can't disclose or they will kill him so in the long run we get nothing of any worth and they get a new excuse for justifying locking down the internet and forcing all communications through government clearing houses. Welome to ze soviet states of amerika

It's not rocket science to put two and two together here.

Originally posted by hawkiye
Your right there is no hard evidence he is plant but his actions are speaking volumes of suspicion. What you are forgetting is there is also no hard evidence he is what he claims to be either; a whistle blower/freedom fighter

The suspicious parts are that none of the information released was really secret we all knew it all ready. Supposedly they could not find Assange until conveniently they are trying to lock down the internet and of course they are locking down military bases and colleges from the information, a convenient prelude to full information lock-down and control.

So these people with the greatest assets in the world who assassinate whom ever they want can't find a two bit whistle blower and whack him and make him go away ... Yeah right. And then Hillary gets on TV and makes a big deal out of it and gives the story even more legs when all they had to do was deny it all and paint him as a crazy whacko and never mention it again. The already control the MSM if they were really ambarrased about this stuff why would they give this story any air time? They have an agenda and Assange is a player either as a pawn or thier operative, which one does not matter.

Now he is dangling the carrot saying the real stuff he has he can't disclose or they will kill him so in the long run we get nothing of any worth and they get a new excuse for justifying locking down the internet and forcing all communications through government clearing houses. Welome to ze soviet states of amerika

It's not rocket science to put two and two together here.

Oh, so you knew that the Italian primeminister is scared of his own secret service?
And you knew the Norwegians gave away the f-35 fighter jet deal to the US in an open bid with the eurofighter and the jas gripen?
And you knew Hillary was collecting Ban Ki-Moons DNA?



Man! I wish I had your sources, I for one did not know that beforehand.....

Aside from Soros' financing of WL doesn't the MSM coverage set off any warning bells?
They ignored WL before, now it's top of the news.
I'm sure the owners of the MSM are absolutely hell-bent on bringing down the government, the banks and industry they are in bed with.
At what point did they turn suicidal?

Assange's flippant attitude about 9/11 truth is one more reason I believe he is NOT what he portrays himself to be. What makes him so sure the OS is correct? If he has info to back it up we would all LOVE to put these conspiracy theories to rest. I'm sick of researching 9/11 myself but the anomalies, inconsistencies and outright lies of the 911 Commission will not allow me stop until I can be convinced one way or another.

What did Cass Sunnstein say about "infiltrating online conspiracy sites and/or shutting them down"?
Didn't the DOD recently announce their Cyberwarfare center was up and ready for action?

What bait do child molesters use to attract their victims willingly?

Candy.

Originally posted by Asktheanimals
Aside from Soros' financing of WL doesn't the MSM coverage set off any warning bells?
They ignored WL before, now it's top of the news.
I'm sure the owners of the MSM are absolutely hell-bent on bringing down the government, the banks and industry they are in bed with.
At what point did they turn suicidal?

Assange's flippant attitude about 9/11 truth is one more reason I believe he is NOT what he portrays himself to be. What makes him so sure the OS is correct? If he has info to back it up we would all LOVE to put these conspiracy theories to rest. I'm sick of researching 9/11 myself but the anomalies, inconsistencies and outright lies of the 911 Commission will not allow me stop until I can be convinced one way or another.

What did Cass Sunnstein say about "infiltrating online conspiracy sites and/or shutting them down"?
Didn't the DOD recently announce their Cyberwarfare center was up and ready for action?

What bait do child molesters use to attract their victims willingly?

Candy.

You clearly are not much good at research as a quick google search would answer your question.

Wikileaks want the most political impact they can get with their leaks, that is their promise to the leakers and the public.

And 9/11, let's look at some other conspiracies for just a while. The last 9 yrs have been nothing but that, let's see what Assange brings to the table first before we start calling stuff neither you or me know the answer to.