It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by cupocoffee
Originally posted by The Shrike
I'll be honest with you, I have not read any of his books or briefing documents. But I have seen the videos, I have read extensively about him and everybody comes to the same conclusions about him. Even here he is not liked or respected except by a few who are "blind" and think he's the cat's pajamas or the cat's meow.
So, basically you just believe what everyone around here tells you to believe? Good boy!
Well, I actually have all his books, and have read them, and seen the documents and things in them. So my opinion is somewhat different from yours due to simply having done more research and being more educated.
The man has plenty of documents and evidence, that is fact.
A lot of people think his CSETI group is total BS, and that's fine. But his Disclosure Project and Orion Project stuff is very serious, I know it is.
Originally posted by Schaden
(snip)
Greer demonstrably has high level contacts and sources.
(snip)
Apparently the director of the defense intelligence agency had time for him. Greer claims he had the reality of ET visitations confirmed to him. Edgar Mitchell was there also, and backed up Greer's claim.
(snip)
You think the director of the CIA really "knows" where all the bodies are buried ? It's a political appointment. You keep going back to the theory that this dinner party meeting was a coincidence. Naive.
(snip)
You are grossly misinformed. It's a fact the US Government treats the subject of UFOs as a national security item, and has gone to court to maintain the secrecy of UFO data. CAUS vs NSA ?
Originally posted by cupocoffee
Originally posted by WingedBull
Name one thing Greer has been right about. Simple as that. Not something that has to be twisted, stretched and looked at sideways but something that is irrevocably right.
He is right about the truth embargo on UFOs and ETs, the testimony and evidence provided by all his witnesses establish that.
For many years he has been talking about the "shadow government" - a secret trans-national government hidden within the governments, also often called the "NWO", "Cabal", "Illuminati" etc. He is also right about that. The evidence is all over ATS and many other sites.
He is right about advanced energy and propulsion technologies being suppressed. Some basic research into alternative energy will reveal that there's all sorts of technology already extant that could replace coal, oil and nuclear power; but the governments simply don't bother to roll it out. Thorium, for instance.
Greer really is quite a knowledgeable person and he is right on the ball about a lot of things; so it's really too bad that he sometimes does these dumb things and shoots himself in the foot by claiming to levitate, etc etc.
Originally posted by cupocoffee
Originally posted by Facefirst
I still can't believe people will stick up for Greer.
Why were Greer and Woosley both there? It was a social visit. Woosley and three other people who were there said so. I've been to many dinners with people I've never met before. Bet you've been too.
Wow, way to not answer any of my questions. What was the nature and purpose of this "dinner party"? Who organized and hosted it? When was it? Where was it? Why were Greer and Woolsey both there?
I still can't believe everyone just automatically believes Woolsey's side of the story, even though he has provided NO information about this alleged "dinner party" other than that the six of them were all there; oh and he was also the Director of the Cocaine Importing Agency / Al-CIAda.........
Why is a sitting Director of the Cocaine Importing Agency automatically more honest and moral than Greer, I wonder?
The burden of proof is upon Greer, not me.
And how would he prove it? Film the meeting and post it on Youtube?
I really don't think the CIA rolls that way......
I'm not the one making the claims and why did Former NASA Astronaut Edgar Mitchell ask to have his name removed from anything to do with Greer's Disclosure Project?
I don't know. The two of them seem to have had some kind of personal falling-out. And yet Edgar Mitchell still says a lot of the same things that Greer says.
That letter Woosley sent has four people essentially calling Greer a liar.
So what? People can put lies in writing and even affix their signatures to those lies, you know. I don't know about you but It's happened to me before!
Anyway, I understand why these four people did this. Because Greer was not discrete about the meeting but instead went around bragging about it to the entire world and using it to make himself look important. I already explained that. They didn't like it that Greer was so public about the meeting, so they gave him a little slap on the wrist.
Greer has done this other times. He went around saying a few years back that he was in the process of securing an actual Zero Point energy device, which would have been monumental if true. It wasn't. He suddenly went quiet about it and gave some dramatic explanation that made little to no sense.
I do think there are at least a few groups that have real free energy technology. Bedini and his supporters, the Alperen group.... But Greer never mentions them, so my guess is that they simply decided not to work with Greer and his people.
I know Greer was hoping that he would be the one leading the Free Energy disclosure again, with another big National Press Club conference and all that. But it looks like Bedini and others are leading the charge instead.
Which is great, I don't really care if it's Greer or someone else that gets it done, as long as it gets done, know what I mean?
There are entire threads dedicated to exposing this guy for the drama-queen fraud he is. Just do a search.
I'm well aware of all the other Greer threads. And it's always the same thing - Woolsey letter, moth picture, $1000 entrance fee, Non-Disclosure Agreement. People just focus on all the most negative evidence, while ignoring all the positive.
All I'm trying to do here is provide a bit more of a balanced view. Yes there is a lot of evidence against Greer - but there is also a lot of positive evidence.
Egotistical? Yes, definitely. Drama-queen? Yes. Saviour-complex? Absolutely. But he is not a con man or fraud. He has a good heart and the most positive intentions for humanity and for the Earth.
Originally posted by The Shrike
You know your comments in support of Greer are downright ridiculous. You're parrroting. Do you have anything original to contribute to the thread?
Originally posted by Facefirst
A guy like Greer who constantly calls for "Open Disclosure" by the Government but requires a non-disclosure agreement and a $1000 fee to hang out with him is laughable. That's called a CON MAN.
Originally posted by Facefirst
And wouldn't you think a "Briefing" would have taken place at a CIA office rather than over a dinner table during a meal?
Originally posted by FireMoon
So one bunch of proven serial liars calling another liar a liar.... and your point is? Were you present at that dinner and party to the conversation? I guess not, so I'm quite sure exactly what you are trying to prove.
Originally posted by Schaden
I find it amusing people could actually believe this was a chance encounter. And Woolsey was not there to get information from Greer. Yeah basically Greer didn't show discretion. And Edgar Mitchell may have tried to distance himself from DP, but he did vouch for Greer's story about a confirmation of alien visitors from an O-9 at the Pentagon. That Vice Admiral was tracked down and denied everything.
I think Greer may have lost his mind. But I think his intentions were good.
Originally posted by The Shrike
You know your comments in support of Greer are downright ridiculous. You're parrroting. Do you have anything original to contribute to the thread?
Originally posted by Helmkat
As soon as I realized Greers words ( full disclosure) were different then his actions (disclosure only for those who will pay for it), I knew he was a scam artist.
Originally posted by Pimander
(snip)
Originally posted by The Shrike
You know your comments in support of Greer are downright ridiculous. You're parrroting. Do you have anything original to contribute to the thread?
Shrike, I find you at times simply act like some forum equivalent of an agent prevocateur. Minor insults, little contribution of your own and then ask a person who has genuinely engaged with the discussion whether they have anything to contribute. If you aren't pathetically attempting to just insult people and stop real debate then you're wasting your life buddy. Just saying what somebody says is not true or of no value IS OF NO VALUE! Contribute something original yourself. (He will probably just Shrike insults at me now and pretend to contribute and stop us debating lol)
(snip)
Guys, at the end of the day, we should be mature enough to know that you do not have to be credible in every way to make a contribution to knowledge or society.
(snip)
Originally posted by Schaden
Originally posted by Facefirst
And wouldn't you think a "Briefing" would have taken place at a CIA office rather than over a dinner table during a meal?
semantics
I find it amusing people could actually believe this was a chance encounter. And Woolsey was not there to get information from Greer. Yeah basically Greer didn't show discretion. And Edgar Mitchell may have tried to distance himself from DP, but he did vouch for Greer's story about a confirmation of alien visitors from an O-9 at the Pentagon. That Vice Admiral was tracked down and denied everything. By the logic of this thread, I guess you could say that makes Edgar Mitchell a liar, since he confirms he was at the Pentagon with Greer and got unofficial word that ETs are real but classified above our need to know.
I think Greer may have lost his mind. But I think his intentions were good.
Originally posted by The Shrike
Originally posted by Pimander
(snip)
Originally posted by The Shrike
You know your comments in support of Greer are downright ridiculous. You're parrroting. Do you have anything original to contribute to the thread?
Shrike, I find you at times simply act like some forum equivalent of an agent prevocateur. Minor insults, little contribution of your own and then ask a person who has genuinely engaged with the discussion whether they have anything to contribute. If you aren't pathetically attempting to just insult people and stop real debate then you're wasting your life buddy. Just saying what somebody says is not true or of no value IS OF NO VALUE! Contribute something original yourself. (He will probably just Shrike insults at me now and pretend to contribute and stop us debating lol)
(snip)
Guys, at the end of the day, we should be mature enough to know that you do not have to be credible in every way to make a contribution to knowledge or society.
(snip)
You ought to practice what you preach. I am an agent "prevocatur" (sic), I provoke the mentally-challenged to do think clearly. Are you provoked?
And don't challenge my contributions to the Aliens & UFOs forum 'cause you're gonna come out on the losing side.
Originally posted by The Shrike
The US Gov't doesn't treat UFOs as a national security. What they protect are the methods of getting the information, it's always been that way.
Originally posted by Facefirst
Please show your proof that Mitchell "backed up" Greer. I would love to see it.
Subsequent to that, I did take my story to the Pentagon -- not NASA, but the Pentagon -- and asked for a meeting with the Intelligence Committee of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and got it. And told them my story and what I know and eventually had that confirmed by the admiral that I spoke with, that indeed what I was saying was true. IK: You mean what had been told to you was true? EM: Yup, in other words. There was a UFO crash. There was an alien spacecraft. This gentleman tried his damndest to get me in and like so many others in the administration over the last 60 years, since JFK's time, was unable to. He was told 'Admiral, you don't have a need to know, and therefore go get lost,' essentially. IK: Have you ever come out and said who this person was who briefed you? EM: No, I have not. IK: Would you at some point? EM: No, it is out and around but I don't feel like I have the liberty to do that. IK: When did you have your meeting at the Pentagon? EM: It was in the late '90s in Washington when I was there working with The Disclosure Project, trying to get all those opened up with another Naval officer by the name of Will Miller and Steven Greer, who you probably heard of. Steven and I don't really work on this anymore together, but we did at that point and getting to the Pentagon and seeing what we could do there to try to get this opened up.