It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Wikileaks Exposed - The man behind the NWO Curtain

page: 28
203
<< 25  26  27    29  30  31 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 5 2010 @ 01:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by SkurkNilsen
I was referring to this, witch seems to be wikileaks plan as well.

SEEMS being the keyword here.
Yes it does SEEM as though that
is their plan. But some
can see through to the
real agenda.
edit on 12/5/2010 by boondock-saint because: spelling




posted on Dec, 5 2010 @ 01:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by SkurkNilsen
And how do I react to the topic and discussion if you would be so kind to give me a brief analyzes?
And BTW, yet another smokescreen, no real answers on the topic....

You have the same agenda wikileaks does
presenting the fake facade for the world
to see as noted by your topic discussion
and leading ques.



posted on Dec, 5 2010 @ 01:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by SkurkNilsen
I was referring to this, witch seems to be wikileaks plan as well.

SEEMS being the keyword here.
Yes it does SEEM as though that
is there plan. But some
can see through to the
real agenda.


Yeah, and it would be really great with some proof of that


You could put it here:

Give Me Hard Proof Wikileaks or Assange Is NWO, please!



posted on Dec, 5 2010 @ 01:13 PM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by SkurkNilsen
And how do I react to the topic and discussion if you would be so kind to give me a brief analyzes?
And BTW, yet another smokescreen, no real answers on the topic....

You have the same agenda wikileaks does
presenting the fake facade for the world
to see as noted by your topic discussion
and leading ques.


Yeah, well.... I would as stated earlier love to see some evidence



posted on Dec, 5 2010 @ 01:16 PM
link   

Originally posted by SkurkNilsen
Only difference is Boondock is a bit smarter and more cunning than the OP in that thread.

I will take that as a compliment.
And likewise, the same could
be said about you.



posted on Dec, 5 2010 @ 01:17 PM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


Maybe because you responded to this


Originally posted by jaynkeel So Boon did this come about after our discussion on that other thread the other day? In your search down the rabbit hole? I gotta say think you nailed it again on this thread.


with this



Yes I did change my mind after that conversation with you in the other thread. A lot can happen in one's opinions in a 24 hr period. and thanks for your input here


So that thread did start changing your mind and in the 24 hour period after you had completely changed your mind. If you don't want to give up the link then it's back to comparing your posts to Jankeel's posts, I'm pretty sure it's that thread, maybe someone else could have a look.



posted on Dec, 5 2010 @ 01:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by SkurkNilsen
And how do I react to the topic and discussion if you would be so kind to give me a brief analyzes?
And BTW, yet another smokescreen, no real answers on the topic....

You have the same agenda wikileaks does
presenting the fake facade for the world
to see as noted by your topic discussion
and leading ques.


Ofcourse, I support wikileaks and the pirateparty...
But, I still don't see any evidence of your claims that this is NWO, and that would really would be world news.
I don't see your reasons for withholding the info you clearly sit on. (pr the title)

Maybe you should give it to a whistleblower organisation of some kind if your'e scared of the consequences of releasing this inf yourself.........



posted on Dec, 5 2010 @ 01:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by SkurkNilsen
Only difference is Boondock is a bit smarter and more cunning than the OP in that thread.

I will take that as a compliment.
And likewise, the same could
be said about you.


Guess you didn't read the thread I was refering to.... But, hey, thanks



posted on Dec, 5 2010 @ 01:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by aivlas
So that thread did start changing your mind and in the 24 hour period after you had completely changed your mind. If you don't want to give up the link then it's back to comparing your posts to Jankeel's posts, I'm pretty sure it's that thread, maybe someone else could have a look.

I do not remember the title of the thread
but look for the pages in the thread where
jaynkeel and I were posting opposing
views on the same page. But I can tell you
that what ur looking for is a dead end.
I did not adhere to jaynkeel's thinking
in that thread.
My research after that thread is what
lead me to this hypothesis in this thread.



posted on Dec, 5 2010 @ 01:24 PM
link   

Originally posted by SkurkNilsen
Maybe you should give it to a whistleblower organisation of some kind if your'e scared of the consequences of releasing this inf yourself.........

lmao
yes sure, let's give it to wikileaks




posted on Dec, 5 2010 @ 01:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by SkurkNilsen
Guess you didn't read the thread I was refering to.... But, hey, thanks

Don't have to read that thread.
It's all laid out right here.

But I might go take a peek
just to see what propaganda
is playing



posted on Dec, 5 2010 @ 01:29 PM
link   

Originally posted by SkurkNilsen
But, I still don't see any evidence of your claims that this is NWO, and that would really would be world news.
I don't see your reasons for withholding the info you clearly sit on. (pr the title)

Maybe you should give it to a whistleblower organisation of some kind if your'e scared of the consequences of releasing this inf yourself.........

why are you so paranoid
of this info ????

Could it be that it can cause
the building blocks to fall ???



posted on Dec, 5 2010 @ 01:34 PM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


The thread I posted is the only thread I can find where you have been discussing wikileaks with jaynkeel before this thread was started. Therefore I believe something in that thread helped you see something that changed your mind on the subject or started you researching something that lead you to change your mind in the 24 hours following.
edit on 5-12-2010 by aivlas because: added end

edit on 5-12-2010 by aivlas because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 5 2010 @ 01:37 PM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by aivlas
So that thread did start changing your mind and in the 24 hour period after you had completely changed your mind. If you don't want to give up the link then it's back to comparing your posts to Jankeel's posts, I'm pretty sure it's that thread, maybe someone else could have a look.

I do not remember the title of the thread
but look for the pages in the thread where
jaynkeel and I were posting opposing
views on the same page. But I can tell you
that what ur looking for is a dead end.
I did not adhere to jaynkeel's thinking
in that thread.
My research after that thread is what
lead me to this hypothesis in this thread.


Then just give us some evidence!

I mean, in all your research there has to be something that can convince us all, not only you....



posted on Dec, 5 2010 @ 01:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by SkurkNilsen
Maybe you should give it to a whistleblower organisation of some kind if your'e scared of the consequences of releasing this inf yourself.........

lmao
yes sure, let's give it to wikileaks



Yeah, or maybe one of the right-wing whistleblower orgs

I don't think wikileaks is gonna publish evidence against its own ("NWO")organisation.




posted on Dec, 5 2010 @ 01:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by SkurkNilsen
But, I still don't see any evidence of your claims that this is NWO, and that would really would be world news.
I don't see your reasons for withholding the info you clearly sit on. (pr the title)

Maybe you should give it to a whistleblower organisation of some kind if your'e scared of the consequences of releasing this inf yourself.........

why are you so paranoid
of this info ????

Could it be that it can cause
the building blocks to fall ???


What?!?

I want the info, if what I believe in is a sham it's pretty obvious I want to know.

And i promise, scouts honor, that I will give up ATS and give you a 100% victory if you give me a little evidence.



posted on Dec, 5 2010 @ 01:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by aivlas
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


The thread I posted is the only thread I can find where you have been discussing wikileaks with jaynkeel before this thread was started. Therefore I believe something in that thread helped you see something that changed your mind on the subject or started you researching something that lead you to change your mind in the 24 hours following.
edit on 5-12-2010 by aivlas because: added end

edit on 5-12-2010 by aivlas because: (no reason given)


But, why should we have to search for it?

I know if I posessed such info I would share it with everyone



posted on Dec, 5 2010 @ 01:49 PM
link   
reply to post by SkurkNilsen
 


It would be a lot easier if he just linked the thread, O wait he forgot the thread that started the research that turned his opinion around
convenient. Lucky the two of them didn't post in that many of the same wikileak threads before this was started.



posted on Dec, 5 2010 @ 02:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by aivlas
reply to post by SkurkNilsen
 


It would be a lot easier if he just linked the thread, O wait he forgot the thread that started the research that turned his opinion around
convenient. Lucky the two of them didn't post in that many of the same wikileak threads before this was started.


I know! It's so ridiculous that I'm sitting here with a permanent grin on my face. Unfortunately, some easily led minds might actually listen to this, ergo, never let them have the last word.
Give me proof or give me more smokescreens, either way is good for me....



posted on Dec, 5 2010 @ 02:02 PM
link   

Originally posted by aivlas

That thread seems to be what lead you to this theory, would you mind linking to it so I might start to see what you see?

Is it this one www.abovetopsecret.com...?
edit on 5-12-2010 by aivlas because: adding

Oh my,
I have made a terrible error,
yes this is the thread.
My bad, so sorry

I was saying this wasn't the thread based upon the fact
I was looking for and scanning the pages for
jaynkeel's old avatar. He has since, changed
his avatar. So I was mistaken, that was the thread
listed here:

www.abovetopsecret.com...

and as you can see I never changed my
thinking in any of my posts in that thread.
It happened later on in the research.



new topics

top topics



 
203
<< 25  26  27    29  30  31 >>

log in

join