It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Wikileaks Exposed - The man behind the NWO Curtain

page: 25
203
<< 22  23  24    26  27  28 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 4 2010 @ 07:50 AM
link   



Is this religious nutjob (Beck) going to save us from the evil philantrope George Soros?






edit on 4-12-2010 by SkurkNilsen because: (no reason given)




posted on Dec, 4 2010 @ 12:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by burntheships
The question we should all be asking now is ...
Who will run in 2012.

it is my opinion that if wikileaks and Soros
get their way, there will not be an election
in 2012.



posted on Dec, 4 2010 @ 01:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by SkurkNilsen
Is this religious nutjob (Beck) going to save us from the evil philantrope George Soros?

if you believe the wikileaks stated agenda
then it should read:

Is wikileaks and Soros going to save us from the
anti-christ?

me thinks not



posted on Dec, 4 2010 @ 01:18 PM
link   

Originally posted by SkurkNilsen
I just fail to see your problem....

my current problem is people like you
in this thread who keep asking the
same question over and over again
after I have already stated the answer
to. All ur doing trying to do is derail the
thread. And besides is a comic strip
supposed to change anyone's mind?
It won't change mine.



posted on Dec, 4 2010 @ 01:36 PM
link   
Personnally, I took very seriously what the opener post of this thread stated.

After all, we all noticed how Wikileaks changed these last years : from an open wiki system, it turned to a comment only system, and then finally to a closed one, no user input at all.

About informations on the organization and how the fund are used, information is (very) scarce. This lack of transparency can make you doubt about their real intentions.

Now about Soros, I never heard about him before, but Ive done some extended searchs on the web.

First, he is indeed a billionnaire (#35 on Forbes' list) and runs many organizations.

Secondly, he is a self-claimed philantropist, and was a student of Karl Popper philosophist, and is a follower of the open society ideal :
en.wikipedia.org...

Thirdly, I've tried to find any scandal about George Soros, but other than false one (eg:
mediamatters.org...
) and unproved claims (eg:
www.questionsquestions.net...
), I could not find any serious proof.

Fourthly, Wikileaks wasn't created by George Soros, its origins are still unclear, but it seems that the project was far more planned and by much more individuals than what you all here, me included, thought.
cryptome.org...



1) Retired new york architect and notorious intelligence leak
facilitator
2) Euro cryptographer/programmer
3) Pacific physicist and illustrator
4) A pacific author and economic policy lecturer
5) Euro, Ex-Cambridge mathematician/cryptographer/programmer
6) Euro businessman and security specialist/activist
7) Author of software than runs 40% of the world's websites.
8) US pure mathematician with criminal law background
9) An infamous US ex-hacker
10) Pacific cryptographer/physicist and activist
11) US/euro cryptographer and activist/programmer
12) Pacific programmer
13) Pacific architect / foreign policy wonk

New technology and cryptographic ideas permit us to not only encourage
document leaking, but to facilitate it directly on a mass scale. We
intend to place a new star in the political firmament of man.

We are building an uncensorizable branch of Wikipedia for leaked
documents and the civic institutions & social perceptions necessary to
defend and promote it. We have received over 1 million documents from
13 countries, despite not having publicly launched yet!


----

With all these pieces of informations, I will for now stick on thinking that Wikileaks, and George Soros, are still safe organizations, even if I do fear as you that it can be used malenvolently.

After all, someone that has been a student of Karl Popper can't be that bad.

/EDIT: The real question is, where is the proof that there is any link between Soros and Wikileaks ?
edit on 4/12/2010 by grosbedo because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 4 2010 @ 02:35 PM
link   


here is George Soros saying

China will be the NEW world revered currency

and his call for a one world order.
very interesting and informative look
into George Soros. He wants this,
he strives for this, this is why he is
funding wikileaks. They have the
same agenda. That agenda is to
destroy America, the last superpower
to stand in the way of a global
One World Order.



posted on Dec, 4 2010 @ 02:48 PM
link   
reply to post by grosbedo
 


Are you worried that these guys will be jailed or something? Do you think they would jail them and not the establishment law breakers (like Hillary and Rice) who were exposed. If anything would start student -- perhaps old guys like me, even -- riots.

The powers that be have a problem. It can only be fixed by these powerful leaders doing what's right, or their moving out of the way for someone who will. Or revolution.

The real hero here is the INTERNET. The first word in the Bible, "IN", converts to the word "INTERNET".

In:
add 0+66+66 ... = "Sn", "Tin", in-66-66 = "er".
add 0+66+66 ... = "Net".
Therefore:
In = "INTERNET".

See the websites listed in my profile.



posted on Dec, 4 2010 @ 02:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by SkurkNilsen
Is this religious nutjob (Beck) going to save us from the evil philantrope George Soros?

if you believe the wikileaks stated agenda
then it should read:

Is wikileaks and Soros going to save us from the
anti-christ?

me thinks not


Antichrist?!?

Well, well.... So that's the story eh?

If this is some religious fairytale bull you could have stated it in the OP, then I wouldn't have wasted my time.

No need for any evidence if it's religion.....



posted on Dec, 4 2010 @ 03:00 PM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by SkurkNilsen
I just fail to see your problem....

my current problem is people like you
in this thread who keep asking the
same question over and over again
after I have already stated the answer
to. All ur doing trying to do is derail the
thread. And besides is a comic strip
supposed to change anyone's mind?
It won't change mine.


You answered me? Really, I didn't notice.

All I got was some keywords and instructions to google them and do my own research, I have and still don't see any evidence of what you are talking about.



posted on Dec, 4 2010 @ 03:04 PM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


You say:




here is George Soros saying

China will be the NEW world revered currency

and his call for a one world order.
very interesting and informative look
into George Soros. He wants this,
he strives for this, this is why he is
funding wikileaks. They have the
same agenda. That agenda is to
destroy America, the last superpower
to stand in the way of a global
One World Order.


Where do you infer that he wants to "destroy America"? He lives here, most of his friends are here. I think he has grown kids here.



posted on Dec, 4 2010 @ 03:11 PM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


That agenda is to
destroy America, the last superpower
to stand in the way of a global
One World Order.


I would say the agenda is to expose the corruption and lies that are fed to the sheep by the US political system..

I think that system is what he wishes to destroy..Not America..
Once the system is exposed and destroyed it may lead to a new America, not a NWO...



posted on Dec, 4 2010 @ 03:39 PM
link   

Originally posted by SkurkNilsen
Antichrist?!?
Well, well.... So that's the story eh?
If this is some religious fairytale bull you could have stated it in the OP, then I wouldn't have wasted my time.
No need for any evidence if it's religion.....

what kind of drugs are u on? lmao

nowhere in the OP did I state anything
about religion. U interjected fairy tale
scenarios with cartoons. Religion was
only mentioned as a rebuttal to ur cartoons
and posed as a question since u brought up
religion by calling Beck a religious nutjob.

Do u get paid by the hr for derailing threads
or does it just come natural ???

edit on 12/4/2010 by boondock-saint because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 4 2010 @ 03:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by backinblack
Once the system is exposed and destroyed it may lead to a new America, not a NWO...

that is exactly what wiki and soros wants
everyone to believe. That they have our
benefit at heart. And when the American
System does actually fall, they will leave
Patriots for the Constitution in the dirt and
push the NWO agenda. They are just using
the people who want freedom til they are no
longer needed.



posted on Dec, 4 2010 @ 03:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by backinblack
Once the system is exposed and destroyed it may lead to a new America, not a NWO...

that is exactly what wiki and soros wants
everyone to believe. That they have our
benefit at heart. And when the American
System does actually fall, they will leave
Patriots for the Constitution in the dirt and
push the NWO agenda. They are just using
the people who want freedom til they are no
longer needed.


That's a bit of a stretch given the information shown in this thread...
I find it hard to believe an 80 year old man is interested in controling the world...



posted on Dec, 4 2010 @ 04:46 PM
link   

Originally posted by backinblack
I find it hard to believe an 80 year old man is interested in controlling the world...

just watch his videos
it's apparent that is
his goal



posted on Dec, 4 2010 @ 05:46 PM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by SkurkNilsen
Antichrist?!?
Well, well.... So that's the story eh?
If this is some religious fairytale bull you could have stated it in the OP, then I wouldn't have wasted my time.
No need for any evidence if it's religion.....

what kind of drugs are u on? lmao

nowhere in the OP did I state anything
about religion. U interjected fairy tale
scenarios with cartoons. Religion was
only mentioned as a rebuttal to ur cartoons
and posed as a question since u brought up
religion by calling Beck a religious nutjob.

Do u get paid by the hr for derailing threads
or does it just come natural ???

edit on 12/4/2010 by boondock-saint because: (no reason given)


Hehe, that's quite funny from a person making claims without any evidence whatsoever.

You are talking about the antichrist...... I'm not.... I was pointing out that you use a ludacris religious nutjob as a source.


What about answering any of the questions posed instead of this everlasting crybaby smokescreen tactics?!?



posted on Dec, 4 2010 @ 06:43 PM
link   
Well Boon,.
Interesting compilation,.
Are you sure this is right?
Maybe you should get this info to the MSM
After all it is now a Global thing and you have solved a VERY old mystery
Nice job



posted on Dec, 4 2010 @ 07:24 PM
link   
Pretty much everyone here on this site seems to agree that the governments of many countries are corrupt, maipulative, and greedy. American is most often the target of these types of comments, though others are not immune.

Much discussion has occured on this site about the lies of governments and the need to do something to expose them and finally make them answerable to the people who have placed them in office.

With this in mind I find it interesting that any organisation or person who openly exposes these faults is immediately considered to be in league with the New World Order.

As such, I am interested in hearing how you propose we can expose the currently corrupt governmental systems around the world without something like Wikileaks, and without any threat of destabalising the current governments.



posted on Dec, 4 2010 @ 07:47 PM
link   
It would seem Boondock's decision to believe in the unproven theory that Wikileaks is "evil" and has "evil intentions" is based upon faith rather than any incontrovertible evidence; the same blind "faith" that he has so foolishly placed into other likely frauds, such as his religion, or Glenn Beck.

Seems to be more interested in believing what he wants to believe, rather than seeking the truth.



posted on Dec, 4 2010 @ 08:36 PM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


Thanks Boon. Flag and star, well deserved
For the revelation of Assange's money ties to Soros, it will please you to know
about that feeling in one's stomach right before you get to peel spuds for a week.
The truth pits, but thanks anyway... I got one.
For the big money at the top, we all know Soros is a mid-level manager. My
bet's still over in one of those castles that never got a scratch it WW2. Cheers



new topics

top topics



 
203
<< 22  23  24    26  27  28 >>

log in

join