It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by romanmel
Originally posted by MarineSniper12Kills
reply to post by thewholepicture
But this is where we need more information on the article....he may have been warned numerous times which then he should def be removed....if this was his first time i can see working out a plan with him or warning him or something
I live in Madison county, Indiana. The policy here is that this man would have to be warned numerous times and allowed many months to resolve problems before he is evicted.edit on 2-12-2010 by romanmel because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by MarineSniper12Kills
But the point is...WAS he or was he NOT. Firstly you should know your county ordinances before you deficate on the land
Originally posted by romanmel
Originally posted by thewholepicture
I'm just curious, because someone has, supposedly, fought for our country, we now have to right no disagree with them without being labeled a hater of our country?
I may dislike most of our government, but do not hate our country!!! Quite the opposite, otherwise I wouldn't be fighting for this guys rights.edit on 2-12-2010 by thewholepicture because: (no reason given)
What about this guy's neighbor's rights?
Just asking?
Originally posted by thewholepicture
Originally posted by MarineSniper12Kills
reply to post by thewholepicture
But this is where we need more information on the article....he may have been warned numerous times which then he should def be removed....if this was his first time i can see working out a plan with him or warning him or something
I would agree with that, as long as the warnings and city codes are warranted. just not having running water and electricity is no warrant. if he is polluting the environment, than that should have been addressed long before now through due process.
Originally posted by romanmel
Originally posted by thewholepicture
Originally posted by MarineSniper12Kills
reply to post by thewholepicture
But this is where we need more information on the article....he may have been warned numerous times which then he should def be removed....if this was his first time i can see working out a plan with him or warning him or something
I would agree with that, as long as the warnings and city codes are warranted. just not having running water and electricity is no warrant. if he is polluting the environment, than that should have been addressed long before now through due process.
"City codes" have nothing to do with this. This is a rural area and they come under the county commishoners in Indiana.
Originally posted by thewholepicture
Originally posted by romanmel
Originally posted by MarineSniper12Kills
reply to post by thewholepicture
But this is where we need more information on the article....he may have been warned numerous times which then he should def be removed....if this was his first time i can see working out a plan with him or warning him or something
I live in Madison county, Indiana. The policy here is that this man would have to be warned numerous times and allowed many months to resolve problems before he is evicted.edit on 2-12-2010 by romanmel because: (no reason given)
Thank you, do you know any more about the situation and the specific "violations"
Originally posted by thewholepicture
reply to post by romanmel
oh i'm sure there is a lot that hasn't been told.
I'm just curious as to why they didn't report more on it, as to past experiences with the guy if there were some
Originally posted by thewholepicture
reply to post by romanmel
oh and I go through alexandria quite often to visit the inlaws.
I live in Lafayette.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by Doujutsu
Yeah I know I addressed that in my first comment on this thread (lost in the pages).
It's a set up to force you into consumerism. Like monsanto and their terminator seeds.