It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by astrocramp
reply to post by SkurkNilsen
Are you trying to prove my point?? First of all, gross national income per capita has nothing to do with standard of living. It's simply gross national income divided by the population. And I don't see a major European country above the US (Switzerland is not a member of the EU, and Isle of Man, Luxembourg, etc don't really count).
For your other list, it has the US at #4, straight from the UN source:
hdr.undp.org...
From your list there was also an additional inequality adjustment made, putting the US at #14, above France, Austria, Spain, and the UK.
Everything you posted supports my statement that Europe does not have a higher standard of living than the US.
Originally posted by astrocramp
reply to post by SkurkNilsen
The point is moot anyway, since GNI per capita is really defining the entire wealth of the nation, not how it's distributed.
What are you trying to prove to me anyway? We're talking about the same data, and my point is already made just by looking at the list.
Originally posted by astrocramp
reply to post by Truth_B_Told
Complete BS. I travel to Europe often, and the standard of living there is less than what it is here. Most middle class families have only one car, they live in much smaller apartments or houses, don't use AC, and have much less furnishing, electronics, computers, etc in their home. Wages are higher in the US, taxes are lower, and goods are generally less expensive.
A lot of things about Europe are superior to the US, like their diet and public transportation system and yes they get more vacation. But to say their standard of living is better is complete crap. And don't get me started that asians have higher standards, that's simply preposterous.
“Understanding Mobility in America” contains a number of other significant findings. It presents comparisons between US intergenerational mobility and existing trends in other advanced capitalist economies, especially in Europe. It finds that mobility is lower in the US than in France, Germany, Sweden, Canada, Finland, Norway and Denmark. Among the major wealthy countries, only Britain has a lower rate of mobility than the US. This is particularly noteworthy, given the incessant claims—repeated most recently in comments by various media pundits on the mass struggle of French students and youth against the government’s plans to attack the rights of young workers—that European workers and youth, by fighting to defend past social gains, are foolishly forfeiting the chance to strike it rich, a chance which is allegedly greater in the United States. Even as American society has become more unequal and social mobility has declined, the myth of mobility maintains its strength. A recent survey in the New York Times showed that 80 percent of Americans polled believe it is possible for anyone to move from poverty to great wealth. The same question posed in 1983 produced an affirmative answer from less than 60 percent.
Originally posted by FrancoUn-American
Yah know what? I take it all back screw the world meet us on the battlefield
Originally posted by Darkrunner
reply to post by Truth_B_Told
I'd rather work than sit on my ass.
But that's just me.