It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Illustronic
Thermite is a gravity burn incendiary. Its main uses were to disarm ordinances. It's quite useless in building demolitions. It simply cannot take out vertical columns, the mass required to do so would exceed the columns themselves, kind of hard to hide that much mass.
It's amazing that since 9/11 everyone is suddenly an expert about all things thremite/thermate. I'd wager to guess that before 2005 that nobody ever heard of thermite and now we have thousands of experts, pseudo experts that is.
Originally posted by okbmd
reply to post by SphinxMontreal
What proof do you have that hundreds of tons of steel crashed into WTC 7? Which official source did you get this information from?
What proof do you have that it didn't ?
Official source ? You guys claim anything "official" is part of some dark and devious cover-up but , now you ask me to give you an official source ?
Originally posted by Chinesis
Originally posted by okbmd
reply to post by SphinxMontreal
What proof do you have that hundreds of tons of steel crashed into WTC 7? Which official source did you get this information from?
What proof do you have that it didn't ?
Official source ? You guys claim anything "official" is part of some dark and devious cover-up but , now you ask me to give you an official source ?
This is why no one should debate with a fool...
So since there isn't any perfectly available proof of something is to logically conclude
that it doesn't exist, which is why you place the burden of proof on a poster of ATS?
What a jokester.
Your logic: "No, you."
The scientific community applauds you sir!
Originally posted by demonseed
Or, maybe it just crashed into the ground so fast that it disintegrated? A plane falling straight down and exploding could potentially leave very little debris.
Originally posted by Illustronic
Thermite is a gravity burn incendiary. Its main uses were to disarm ordinances. It's quite useless in building demolitions. It simply cannot take out vertical columns, the mass required to do so would exceed the columns themselves, kind of hard to hide that much mass.
It's amazing that since 9/11 everyone is suddenly an expert about all things thremite/thermate. I'd wager to guess that before 2005 that nobody ever heard of thermite and now we have thousands of experts, pseudo experts that is.
Originally posted by Chinesis
Originally posted by Illustronic
Thermite is a gravity burn incendiary. Its main uses were to disarm ordinances. It's quite useless in building demolitions. It simply cannot take out vertical columns, the mass required to do so would exceed the columns themselves, kind of hard to hide that much mass.
It's amazing that since 9/11 everyone is suddenly an expert about all things thremite/thermate. I'd wager to guess that before 2005 that nobody ever heard of thermite and now we have thousands of experts, pseudo experts that is.
A couple of things here to mention.
(1) How do YOU know Thermite or any other variation cannot take out
vertical columns? While I'm sure your next move would be to cite
sources that would affirm your claim are you really sure of this?
What do you make of this video?
www.youtube.com...
(2) The public's unawareness of Thermite has NOTHING to do with this discussion.
Are you attempting to pull rank and be put yourself in higher company as some authoritative
figure on Thermite?
(3rd) If Thermite is discredited at being the catalyst for the towers' destruction (which burns at 4500)
Are we to really believe that office materials, and jet fuel as well as the other materials (which burn at 1500)
was what was responsible?
Really?
FIRE?edit on 21-11-2010 by Chinesis because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by notsoperfect
reply to post by demonseed
I would like people to dig into who is hiding behind this "demonseed" face first before responding to this dumb thread.
Originally posted by demonseed
I have been believing 9/11 conspiracies for quite some time. I would say about a year after 9/11 i started asking questions up until about last week. I always had doubts in my mind about the conspiracy theories, but in general i felt that many questions had been un-answered and in that regard i gave my credence to the 9/11 conspiracy theories and what the "truthers" stood for.
However, i recently had a change of heart. At this point, there are too many 9/11 conspiracy theory loopholes that in all honesty add up a million times worse than even the "official" story.
Originally posted by Leo Strauss
Now if someone like BoneZ or LabBtop has a "change of heart" I will take notice.
Originally posted by Leo Strauss
What I really am waiting for is for Weedwhacker, hooper, GenRadek, to have a "change of heart"
Originally posted by ohmajojo
Thank you for your clear and focus reply to the OP's post.
Originally posted by Illustronic
It simply cannot take out vertical columns, the mass required to do so would exceed the columns themselves, kind of hard to hide that much mass.
Originally posted by Illustronic
You also might give us a clue as to how much thermite would be needed to sever a vertical column, and it starts to become clear that its a far fetched method to use.