It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

2 x 5 Pointed Stars over Regents Park London (Google Maps)

page: 3
4
<< 1  2    4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 16 2010 @ 02:18 PM
link   
Ok let's ask a couple of questions that hopefully we can get straight answers to.

1. Would Google Maps draw in fake lines to represent paths?

If so then this would explain the anomaly.

2. Is there a reason why there are two 5 pointed stars in Regents Park?

This would help me understand why the stars exist.

These are the two personal points i have been wishing to clarify, nothing more nothing less.

Thanks!




posted on Nov, 16 2010 @ 02:20 PM
link   
I think you're a troll, as I've already told you these paths exist, what with having been to the park and using them.

Why they are five pointed stars? Who knows, conspiracy, coincidence, practicality?

Anyway, I'm going to stop now. I don't feel like being laughed at anymore by the OP



posted on Nov, 16 2010 @ 02:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by monkey_descendant
I think you're a troll, as I've already told you these paths exist, what with having been to the park and using them.

Why they are five pointed stars? Who knows, conspiracy, coincidence, practicality?

Anyway, I'm going to stop now. I don't feel like being laughed at anymore by the OP


Everyone is entitled to their opinion but it does not explain why these lines dissapear and reapear everytime i scroll in and out of the map with my mouse.

They are the only things that dissapear and then reapear in a split second as i scroll in and out of the map. Everything else stays where it is, indicating these lines have been drawn in.

Each to their own, however!
edit on 16-11-2010 by nakiannunaki because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 16 2010 @ 02:26 PM
link   
reply to post by nakiannunaki
 


So basically, having said that I have walked down these paths, you are prepared to call me a liar?



posted on Nov, 16 2010 @ 02:27 PM
link   
reply to post by nakiannunaki
 


1: google hasnt drawn "fake" lines we have proved they are are physical paths
2: the triangles were part of the original design of the park by john nash in 1818

repeat no anomaly



posted on Nov, 16 2010 @ 02:29 PM
link   
reply to post by nakiannunaki
 


are you seeing different triangles to the rest of us?



posted on Nov, 16 2010 @ 02:29 PM
link   

Originally posted by monkey_descendant
reply to post by nakiannunaki
 


So basically, having said that I have walked down these paths, you are prepared to call me a liar?


If you read my previous posts you will note i said that these stars could well be there. I am not questioning if they are there or not in reality.

What i am saying is that Google Maps have drawn parts of this star in. Possibally prior to them being laid. They could well have taken the images before the star was complete and then drew in the remaining lines.

This would explain the anomaly and address one of my two questions.



posted on Nov, 16 2010 @ 02:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by dashdespatch
reply to post by nakiannunaki
 


are you seeing different triangles to the rest of us?


Ok so zoom in and out of the bottom part of the large star and "honestly" tell me you dont see some of the paths dissapear and then reapear.



posted on Nov, 16 2010 @ 02:33 PM
link   

Originally posted by nakiannunaki

Originally posted by monkey_descendant
reply to post by nakiannunaki
 


So basically, having said that I have walked down these paths, you are prepared to call me a liar?


If you read my previous posts you will note i said that these stars could well be there. I am not questioning if they are there or not in reality.

What i am saying is that Google Maps have drawn parts of this star in. Possibally prior to them being laid. They could well have taken the images before the star was complete and then drew in the remaining lines.

This would explain the anomaly and address one of my two questions.



Originally posted by dashdespatch
reply to post by nakiannunaki
 


1: google hasnt drawn "fake" lines we have proved they are are physical paths
2: the triangles were part of the original design of the park by john nash in 1818

repeat no anomaly


Wow, I'm going with the initial analysis I made in this thread



posted on Nov, 16 2010 @ 02:34 PM
link   
the triangles i and the other posters are talking about have been there since the seventeenth centuty they are not waiting to be completed

please provide a picture or somthing of the triangles you see!!



posted on Nov, 16 2010 @ 02:34 PM
link   

Originally posted by nakiannunaki

Originally posted by dashdespatch
reply to post by nakiannunaki
 


are you seeing different triangles to the rest of us?


Ok so zoom in and out of the bottom part of the large star and "honestly" tell me you dont see some of the paths dissapear and then reapear.


If I zoom out almost all of the way then the paths do start to become less focused, just with the entire rest of the map! Have you never used google maps before? Do you not realise this is what happens with google maps? The more you zoom in the more paths you see??



posted on Nov, 16 2010 @ 02:34 PM
link   

Originally posted by monkey_descendant

Originally posted by nakiannunaki

Originally posted by monkey_descendant
reply to post by nakiannunaki
 


So basically, having said that I have walked down these paths, you are prepared to call me a liar?


If you read my previous posts you will note i said that these stars could well be there. I am not questioning if they are there or not in reality.

What i am saying is that Google Maps have drawn parts of this star in. Possibally prior to them being laid. They could well have taken the images before the star was complete and then drew in the remaining lines.

This would explain the anomaly and address one of my two questions.



Originally posted by dashdespatch
reply to post by nakiannunaki
 


1: google hasnt drawn "fake" lines we have proved they are are physical paths
2: the triangles were part of the original design of the park by john nash in 1818

repeat no anomaly


Wow, I'm going with the initial analysis I made in this thread




And i thought you said you were going altogether...



posted on Nov, 16 2010 @ 02:37 PM
link   
You know what never mind. I know what i see and i see Google Maps have drawn these lines in.

Let's leave it at that.



posted on Nov, 16 2010 @ 02:37 PM
link   
reply to post by nakiannunaki
 


I would have gone already, but I'm fascinated by your opinion. I'm trying to work out if you're sincere or not.
edit on 16-11-2010 by monkey_descendant because: rude



posted on Nov, 16 2010 @ 02:45 PM
link   
reply to post by nakiannunaki
 


Google Maps did not exist when the park was built. The "anomalies" you see are a result of the crappy quality of Google Maps. At least 2 posters have run on those routes.



posted on Nov, 16 2010 @ 02:52 PM
link   
i was going but i am begining to think you are seing somthing different to the rest of us



posted on Nov, 16 2010 @ 02:54 PM
link   
Heres the same two areas from Bing maps for comparison





It's only a few miles from my home, but I've never hovered a mile above it so I can't say I have noticed the stars before
edit on 16-11-2010 by davespanners because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 16 2010 @ 02:56 PM
link   
aaagh not sure what this is all about anymore!!



posted on Nov, 16 2010 @ 03:01 PM
link   
Ok so i went to the trouble of filming the stupid thing!

Anyways this is what i am trying to explain about the paths through the pitches and the dissapearing lines.




posted on Nov, 16 2010 @ 03:03 PM
link   
who do I see about a refund for that 10 minutes of my life?




top topics



 
4
<< 1  2    4  5 >>

log in

join