It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
demigod [ˈdɛmɪˌgɒd] n 1. (Myth & Legend / Classical Myth & Legend) a. a mythological being who is part mortal, part god
Originally posted by Illusionsaregrander
reply to post by jganer
So you want us to assume the virgin birth was reality? Because that was a late(er) add in when Jesus was being sold to the pagans. Many of their existing mythologies required a virgin birth and so Joseph was sort of set aside as a foster father. In earlier versions, it was acknowledged that Joseph was Jesus' parent, and it was believed that he became the son of God at his baptism by John the baptist.
Any answer to your question would really depend which version of a much added to tale you want us to consider.
In the earliest versions, Jesus' body was entirely human. He had two human parents. He became filled with God at his Baptism, but that changed nothing about his physical form, which, not surprisingly, died in quite human fashion.
Originally posted by jganer
I want to see some proof where Jesus said he was a God because I havn't found it.
Originally posted by Dudeimanoldfart
I think he was a Demi-god. I was watching this whole bit on the history channel about the greek mythology, the gods and all that. If there really is life on other planets ( Aliens ) Virgin births a.k.a Artificial Insemination is very possible. The bible claims it was a virgin birth so it has to be true right? How else would a woman get prego without doing it.
Originally posted by adjensen
Originally posted by jganer
I want to see some proof where Jesus said he was a God because I havn't found it.
I heard an interesting observation the other day. In a literary analysis (as opposed to a theological one) of the New Testament, it was noted that the Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark & Luke) do a very good job of showing you who Jesus is, while intentionally not telling you who Jesus is (the Gospel of John is much more explicit on the nature of Christ.)
During his trial, Jesus turns the question of "are you the Christ" around on his accuser by asking "who do you say I am?", thus allowing the judger to be set up for judgement. This, the lecturer noted, is the point of the literary tactic of the Synoptic Gospels -- you, as the reader, are being asked that question -- "Who do you think Christ is?" The end result being, either you believe that Christ is God, or you do not, and, as Christ's accusers were, your decision is your own, not one forced upon you.
That is the point of the Bible -- I can cite numerous passages that indicate the nature of Christ, but if you don't believe, it makes no difference, because the answer to the question "Who do you think Christ is?" is yours, and yours alone.
Originally posted by jganer
But if Jesus was just a demigod that would mean he wasn’t equal to God, and thus Christians would be worshipping another god and violating the First Commandment. So either is he is equal to God, which means his birth from Mary was pointless or he is a demigod, which would mean he really is not God.]
Originally posted by jganer
Originally posted by adjensen
That is the point of the Bible -- I can cite numerous passages that indicate the nature of Christ, but if you don't believe, it makes no difference, because the answer to the question "Who do you think Christ is?" is yours, and yours alone.
I don't think Jesus was refering to himself when he said "who do you say I am.", I think he was asking who do you think God is. When people see the words "I am" they assume the speaker is reffering to themself when infact anyone can say the words "I am" that does not mean that he is claiming to be "the one" or divine.
Originally posted by babloyi
Originally posted by jganer
But if Jesus was just a demigod that would mean he wasn’t equal to God, and thus Christians would be worshipping another god and violating the First Commandment. So either is he is equal to God, which means his birth from Mary was pointless or he is a demigod, which would mean he really is not God.]
As any bible-reading christian would tell you, Jesus is less than the Father, so they are not equal. Even among trinity believers, this results in it being a hierarchical triangle with the Father on the top, instead of them all being on the same level.
While it is commendable, your clarification of babloyi's earlier comment, I think you are falling into the same sort of thing of assuming that there is an agreement on any part of the Trinity doctrine that is universal among all Christians.
While it is clear that Father, Son and Holy Spirit are distinct, and the Father begat the Son, and the Spirit proceeds from the Father (and the Son, if you're not Eastern Orthodox :-), in no way does this lessen the Son or the Spirit, they are all three God equally.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by adjensen
While it is commendable, your clarification of babloyi's earlier comment, I think you are falling into the same sort of thing of assuming that there is an agreement on any part of the Trinity doctrine that is universal among all Christians.
While it is clear that Father, Son and Holy Spirit are distinct, and the Father begat the Son, and the Spirit proceeds from the Father (and the Son, if you're not Eastern Orthodox :-), in no way does this lessen the Son or the Spirit, they are all three God equally.
From my study on the Council of Nicea and the whole Arian controversy, what came out of it as being the so-called orthodox view, Jesus is in fact not begotten. That is what caused the whole ruckus to start with. How did Jesus come into being? Arius decided that Jesus was begotten but it was back before there was ever a universe and matter and time, but when there only existed the spirit which was a unity. So to him, however it came about, it did and that is a fact, but how it happened does not matter since it is not relevant to any created being such as ourselves. The hierarchy with the Imperial political connections thought otherwise and decided to persecute Arius for having an opinion as not having been given that authority to make a decision, by having been given some sort of throne to sit on. The only way they could effectively squash Arius was to declare that Jesus was not begotten.
Originally posted by adjensen
While it is clear that Father, Son and Holy Spirit are distinct, and the Father begat the Son, and the Spirit proceeds from the Father (and the Son, if you're not Eastern Orthodox :-), in no way does this lessen the Son or the Spirit, they are all three God equally.