John Titor: Hoax, page 3

You back yourself further into an ignorant corner OIMD. The use of such irrelevant comparisons is getting a little long in the tooth.

Sure someone in the Battle of Agincourt would not know they were fighting in the '100 years War'. But it was not called the '100 years War' until later, obviously. They would however know it was not the first in a series of skirmishes and battles between the English and French, that had already been underway for a few decades. Perhaps if the entire 100 years war was insted called 'The Battle of Cr�cy' your analogy would make more sense. Titor doesn't allude to a wider conflict, he doesn't allude to a different war, he refers to the Palestinian/Israeli conflict. To assume otherwise is just your own beliefs blinding you to the clear and simple truth. You also forget that he is not travelling a few centuries into the past, but he is only from 3 decades in the future. If a time traveller from 1450 travelling back to 1414 would be rather remiss if they simply ranted on about previous battles and failed to mention the looming pivotal battle at Agincourt. Or allude to the wider conflict.

His security v liberty comments were in regards to the difference betwen the 'cities' and the rural people. This he tags as the cause for the civil disturbances. In which a Waco-type incident is meant to happen every month this year.

As far as comments about Dirigibles, they are equally as ignorant, if someone was travelling to 1936 from 1970. As if they would not do at least enough research to at least be aware that the hindenburg disaster was to happen the next year. Even more relevant in this context if you consider his other comments regarding space travel:
02/09/01 14:02 (about the future) 329
13. We don’t know what’s on Mars yet.

02/02/01 10:09 (about the future) 270
As far as space travel goes... no, we are not on Mars yet but we’re trying very hard so we can avoid another “Hell’s Kitchen” outcome from an overpopulated Earth

So, in this he states that Space Travel is still a focus, a big one according to the trying very hard comment. His comments on Mars also seem to be rather strange, as even now we pretty much know whats on Mars, bugger all. We don't know what has been on Mars, if anything. He doesn't make this comment in the context of "theres something there we don't know what", or "what we thought originally was incorrect". He simply states "we don't know what's on Mars".

I would suggest that when he wrote the hoax he was unaware of the coming MER missions and therefore didn't even think to include them in his comments.

As far as the shuttle specifically. He hints that there will be a problem with connecting the new lab to the space station.

He clearly therefore is aware of the shuttle, and of the Space Station. Notice he is clever enough not to give a definitive comment of something so near in the future, as he doesn't want to give it away so obviously that he is hoaxing. So we can't pretend he is ignorant of the space program or the shuttle or the space station. He even tries his hand at a guess regarding the shuttle mission. A guess that was obviously wrong. Even more interesting that he tries these simple guesses yet ignores the much bigger events that are to unfold across the board.

Quite simply, you can continue to twist and turn his words to make them fit whatever reality you wish. But it is just your own beliefs forcing the facts to fit. The simple objective truth is. Titor is a hoax. A good one, and one that has suckered a good number of people. The hoax is full of holes, incorrect predictions, and massive oversights in his comments. As well as that his 'evidences' are fundamentally flawed and blatantly false.